Asset Allocation
Find the right asset allocation for Agressive Test (5/31/25)
Add portfolio to the optimizer to find optimal allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio OptimizerPerformance
Performance Chart
The chart shows the growth of an initial investment of $10,000 in Agressive Test (5/31/25), comparing it to the performance of the S&P 500 index or another benchmark. All prices have been adjusted for splits and dividends. The portfolio is rebalanced when any position deviates by more than 0.0% from its target allocation.
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
| Position | 1D | 1M | YTD | 6M | 1Y | 3Y* | 5Y* | 10Y* |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Benchmark S&P 500 Index | 0.50% | 0.31% | 8.56% | 8.85% | 24.33% | 19.37% | 11.84% | 13.61% |
Portfolio Agressive Test (5/31/25) | 0.12% | 0.44% | 7.36% | 8.27% | 13.54% | — | — | — |
| Portfolio components: | ||||||||
AMD Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. | 4.73% | 20.62% | 138.87% | 142.70% | 340.40% | 60.16% | 44.46% | 60.93% |
AVGO Broadcom Inc. | -0.91% | -10.14% | 10.62% | 6.58% | 54.87% | 67.17% | 55.09% | 40.96% |
AXON Axon Enterprise, Inc. | -1.00% | 12.72% | -22.22% | -21.72% | -43.41% | 30.96% | 22.92% | 34.58% |
CBOE Cboe Global Markets, Inc. | -0.33% | -18.59% | 18.03% | 17.09% | 31.97% | 31.02% | 22.58% | 17.84% |
CME CME Group Inc. | 2.80% | -9.35% | 1.58% | 1.41% | 3.90% | 19.92% | 9.17% | 15.38% |
COR Cencora Inc. | 0.07% | 9.30% | -16.27% | -18.27% | -3.97% | 17.14% | 20.65% | 17.47% |
DASH DoorDash, Inc. | -2.59% | -5.41% | -33.51% | -33.81% | -31.23% | 27.20% | -0.47% | — |
ENPH Enphase Energy, Inc. | -0.62% | 3.21% | 70.33% | 69.64% | 19.71% | -32.77% | -17.99% | 39.19% |
GDDY GoDaddy Inc. | 1.42% | -12.55% | -38.56% | -38.91% | -56.62% | 0.78% | -1.63% | 8.82% |
HWM Howmet Aerospace Inc. | 0.03% | -2.83% | 29.23% | 33.60% | 54.95% | 79.69% | 50.00% | 33.28% |
Monthly Returns
Based on dividend-adjusted daily data since Sep 12, 2023, Agressive Test (5/31/25)'s average daily return is +0.15%, while the average monthly return is +3.09%. At this rate, an investment would double in approximately 1.9 years.
Historically, 71% of months were positive and 29% were negative. The best month was Nov 2024 with a return of +13.5%, while the worst month was Mar 2026 at -8.2%. The longest winning streak lasted 7 consecutive months, and the longest losing streak was 2 months.
On a daily basis, Agressive Test (5/31/25) closed higher 58% of trading days. The best single day was Apr 9, 2025 with a return of +7.3%, while the worst single day was Apr 4, 2025 at -7.4%.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 1.73% | 8.85% | -8.21% | 2.75% | 2.82% | -0.01% | 7.36% | ||||||
| 2025 | 5.70% | 6.63% | -2.06% | 5.34% | 6.24% | 4.80% | -2.00% | -0.36% | 4.51% | -0.73% | 1.89% | -1.03% | 32.24% |
| 2024 | 7.61% | 12.52% | 6.68% | -0.43% | 6.99% | 3.08% | 3.79% | 6.83% | 1.74% | 2.39% | 13.49% | -6.51% | 73.84% |
| 2023 | -1.87% | 1.79% | 8.07% | 1.94% | 10.04% |
Benchmark Metrics
Agressive Test (5/31/25) has an annualized alpha of 25.44%, beta of 0.76, and R2 of 0.61 versus S&P 500 Index. Calculated based on daily prices since September 12, 2023.
- This portfolio captured 124.13% of S&P 500 Index gains and tended to rise during its downturns (downside capture of -13.35%) - a profile typical of hedging or uncorrelated assets.
- This portfolio generated an annualized alpha of 25.44% versus S&P 500 Index - delivering returns beyond what market exposure alone would predict.
- Alpha
- 25.44%
- Beta
- 0.76
- R²
- 0.61
- Upside Capture
- 124.13%
- Downside Capture
- -13.35%
Expense Ratio
Agressive Test (5/31/25) has an expense ratio of 0.00%, meaning no management fees are charged. Below, you can find the expense ratios of the portfolio's funds side by side and easily compare their relative costs.
Return for Risk
Risk / Return Rank
Agressive Test (5/31/25) ranks 17 for risk / return — in the bottom 17% of Portfolios on our site. This means you're taking on significantly more risk than the returns justify. Consider whether the potential upside is worth the volatility, or explore alternatives with better risk / return profiles.
Return / Risk — by metrics
The table below presents risk-adjusted performance metrics for Agressive Test (5/31/25) and compares them with S&P 500 Index.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| Portfolio | Benchmark | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.21 | 1.86 | -0.65 |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.77 | 2.53 | -0.76 |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.34 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.32 | 2.53 | -1.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.13 | 11.37 | -7.24 |
How much return does each position deliver for the risk it carries? Higher values mean better reward for the risk taken.
| Position | Risk / Return Rank | Sharpe ratio | Sortino ratio | Omega ratio | Calmar ratio | Martin ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMD Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. | 98 | 5.01 | 4.54 | 1.60 | 12.04 | 24.74 |
AVGO Broadcom Inc. | 73 | 1.11 | 1.69 | 1.22 | 1.77 | 4.11 |
AXON Axon Enterprise, Inc. | 13 | -0.78 | -1.04 | 0.87 | -0.72 | -1.22 |
CBOE Cboe Global Markets, Inc. | 73 | 1.16 | 1.63 | 1.23 | 1.29 | 5.70 |
CME CME Group Inc. | 44 | 0.16 | 0.35 | 1.05 | 0.16 | 0.50 |
COR Cencora Inc. | 35 | -0.13 | 0.03 | 1.01 | -0.12 | -0.33 |
DASH DoorDash, Inc. | 17 | -0.69 | -0.77 | 0.90 | -0.64 | -1.10 |
ENPH Enphase Energy, Inc. | 55 | 0.26 | 1.05 | 1.14 | 0.52 | 0.92 |
GDDY GoDaddy Inc. | 2 | -1.51 | -2.49 | 0.69 | -0.98 | -1.54 |
HWM Howmet Aerospace Inc. | 85 | 1.75 | 2.51 | 1.30 | 3.46 | 9.77 |
Loading charts...
Dividends
Dividend yield
Agressive Test (5/31/25) provided a 1.88% dividend yield over the last twelve months.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Portfolio | 1.88% | 1.15% | 1.08% | 1.40% | 1.38% | 2.30% | 2.04% | 2.12% | 1.85% | 1.38% | 4.13% | 1.78% |
| Portfolio components: | ||||||||||||
AMD Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
AVGO Broadcom Inc. | 0.65% | 0.70% | 0.94% | 1.71% | 3.02% | 2.24% | 3.05% | 3.54% | 3.11% | 1.87% | 1.43% | 1.13% |
AXON Axon Enterprise, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CBOE Cboe Global Markets, Inc. | 0.98% | 1.08% | 1.21% | 1.18% | 1.56% | 1.38% | 1.68% | 1.12% | 1.19% | 0.83% | 1.30% | 1.36% |
CME CME Group Inc. | 4.17% | 1.83% | 4.48% | 4.58% | 5.05% | 3.00% | 3.24% | 2.74% | 2.42% | 4.20% | 4.90% | 5.41% |
COR Cencora Inc. | 0.83% | 0.67% | 0.93% | 0.96% | 1.13% | 5.13% | 6.74% | 7.48% | 2.07% | 1.61% | 1.77% | 1.17% |
DASH DoorDash, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ENPH Enphase Energy, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GDDY GoDaddy Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HWM Howmet Aerospace Inc. | 0.18% | 0.21% | 0.24% | 0.31% | 0.25% | 0.13% | 0.05% | 0.39% | 1.42% | 0.88% | 40.49% | 1.22% |
Drawdowns
Drawdowns Chart
The Drawdowns chart displays portfolio losses from any high point along the way. Drawdowns are calculated considering price movements and all distributions paid, if any.
Loading charts...
Worst Drawdowns
The table below displays the maximum drawdowns of the Agressive Test (5/31/25). A maximum drawdown is a measure of risk, indicating the largest reduction in portfolio value due to a series of losing trades.
The maximum drawdown for the Agressive Test (5/31/25) was 11.83%, occurring on Apr 4, 2025. Recovery took 16 trading sessions.
The current Agressive Test (5/31/25) drawdown is 3.41%.
Related event | Drawdown | Fall | Recovery | Underwater |
|---|---|---|---|---|
2025 selloff2025 | -11.83%Apr 2025 | 1mo 13d | 25d | 2mo 8dFeb 2025 - Apr 2025 |
2026 correction2026 | -10.16%Mar 2026 | 27d | — | 3mo 14dMar 2026 - now |
2024 pullback2024 | -7.27%Dec 2024 | 13d | 1mo 18d | 2mo 1dDec 2024 - Feb 2025 |
2024 pullback2024 | -4.98%Sep 2024 | 11d | 10d | 21dAug 2024 - Sep 2024 |
2023 pullback2023 | -4.76%Oct 2023 | 10d | 7d | 17dOct 2023 - Nov 2023 |
Volatility
Volatility Chart
The chart below shows the rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Diversification
Diversification Metrics
Number of Effective Assets
The portfolio contains 32 assets, with an effective number of assets of 14.60, reflecting the diversification based on asset allocation. Your portfolio is dominated by one or two holdings, which significantly increases concentration risk. Consider rebalancing toward more even weights or adding additional positions.
Diversification Ratio
1Y | All Time | |
|---|---|---|
Diversification Ratio | 3.04 | 2.33 |
The portfolio has a diversification ratio of 2.33, placing it in the top 5% across portfolios — assets in this portfolio move largely independently, providing strong diversification benefit.
Agressive Test (5/31/25) correlation to the S&P 500 Index
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 12, 2023 | 0.71 |
Benchmark Correlations
Correlation vs. S&P 500 Index. AVGO has the highest benchmark correlation at 0.64, while CBOE has the lowest at -0.14.
Portfolio Correlations
Correlation vs. Agressive Test (5/31/25). NVDA has the highest portfolio correlation at 0.62, while CBOE has the lowest at 0.04.
Asset Correlations Table
Find what Agressive Test (5/31/25) is missing
See which holdings overlap, where Agressive Test (5/31/25) is concentrated, and which low-correlation assets could fill the gaps.
Analyze Diversification