PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TPL vs. LLY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

TPL vs. LLY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Texas Pacific Land Corporation (TPL) and Eli Lilly and Company (LLY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TPL achieves a 32.28% return, which is significantly higher than LLY's 5.78% return. Over the past 10 years, TPL has outperformed LLY with an annualized return of 36.58%, while LLY has yielded a comparatively lower 33.45% annualized return.


TPL

1D
2.53%
1M
-2.32%
YTD
32.28%
6M
35.91%
1Y
2.17%
3Y*
38.06%
5Y*
18.80%
10Y*
36.58%

LLY

1D
-2.41%
1M
12.75%
YTD
5.78%
6M
10.64%
1Y
39.26%
3Y*
37.45%
5Y*
39.59%
10Y*
33.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TPL vs. LLY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TPL
Texas Pacific Land Corporation
32.28%-21.61%115.31%-32.40%91.29%73.25%-4.69%44.58%21.96%51.18%
LLY
Eli Lilly and Company
5.78%40.25%33.30%60.91%34.26%66.08%31.04%16.14%40.45%17.83%

Correlation

The correlation between TPL and LLY is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.03

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 1987

0.08

Fundamentals

Market Cap

TPL:

$26.15B

LLY:

$1.02T

EPS

TPL:

$7.30

LLY:

$28.14

PE Ratio

TPL:

51.93

LLY:

40.26

PEG Ratio

TPL:

2.75

LLY:

0.81

PS Ratio

TPL:

31.17

LLY:

14.08

PB Ratio

TPL:

16.81

LLY:

32.54

Total Revenue (TTM)

TPL:

$839.03M

LLY:

$72.25B

Gross Profit (TTM)

TPL:

$625.27M

LLY:

$59.75B

EBITDA (TTM)

TPL:

$690.06M

LLY:

$32.97B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TPL vs. LLY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TPL
TPL Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
TPL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TPL Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
TPL Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
TPL Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
TPL Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

LLY
LLY Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
LLY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LLY Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
LLY Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
LLY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
LLY Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TPL vs. LLY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Texas Pacific Land Corporation (TPL) and Eli Lilly and Company (LLY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TPLLLYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.98

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.22

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.13

1.72

-1.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.25

4.28

-4.03

TPL vs. LLY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TPL Sharpe Ratio is 0.09, which is lower than the LLY Sharpe Ratio of 1.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TPL and LLY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TPL vs. LLY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TPL drawdown since its inception was -73.05%, which is greater than LLY's maximum drawdown of -68.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TPL and LLY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TPLLLYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-73.05%

-68.24%

-4.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-31.68%

-23.64%

-8.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-52.22%

-34.48%

-17.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-52.50%

-34.48%

-18.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-65.46%

-34.48%

-30.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-33.65%

-2.41%

-31.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-27.27%

-19.21%

-8.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.08%

9.49%

+7.59%

Volatility

TPL vs. LLY - Volatility Comparison

Texas Pacific Land Corporation (TPL) has a higher volatility of 14.23% compared to Eli Lilly and Company (LLY) at 9.27%. This indicates that TPL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LLY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TPLLLYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.23%

9.27%

+4.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

38.06%

27.16%

+10.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

46.87%

38.01%

+8.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

46.25%

32.46%

+13.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

47.10%

30.19%

+16.91%

Dividends

TPL vs. LLY - Dividend Comparison

TPL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%, more than LLY's 0.57% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LLY
Eli Lilly and Company
0.57%0.56%0.67%0.78%1.07%1.23%1.75%1.96%1.94%2.46%2.77%2.37%
TPL
Texas Pacific Land Corporation
0.60%0.74%1.37%0.83%1.37%0.88%2.20%0.22%0.55%0.30%0.10%0.22%

Financials

TPL vs. LLY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Texas Pacific Land Corporation and Eli Lilly and Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B20222023202420252026
236.82M
19.80B
(TPL) Total Revenue
(LLY) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

TPL vs. LLY - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Texas Pacific Land Corporation and Eli Lilly and Company over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%202220232024202520260
79.0%
Portfolio components
TPL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Texas Pacific Land Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 236.82M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

LLY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Eli Lilly and Company reported a gross profit of 15.64B and revenue of 19.80B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 79.0%.

TPL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Texas Pacific Land Corporation reported an operating income of 182.33M and revenue of 236.82M, resulting in an operating margin of 77.0%.

LLY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Eli Lilly and Company reported an operating income of 9.19B and revenue of 19.80B, resulting in an operating margin of 46.4%.

TPL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Texas Pacific Land Corporation reported a net income of 142.90M and revenue of 236.82M, resulting in a net margin of 60.3%.

LLY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Eli Lilly and Company reported a net income of 7.40B and revenue of 19.80B, resulting in a net margin of 37.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


TPL and LLY have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TPL has higher volatility (14.23%) compared to LLY (9.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TPL dropped -73.05% vs LLY's -68.24%.

LLY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.07 vs 0.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TPL and LLY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer