PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PLTR vs. T
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

PLTR vs. T - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR) and AT&T Inc. (T). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PLTR achieves a -23.22% return, which is significantly lower than T's -7.40% return.


PLTR

1D
0.69%
1M
-0.97%
YTD
-23.22%
6M
-24.81%
1Y
6.85%
3Y*
108.67%
5Y*
41.37%
10Y*

T

1D
-1.10%
1M
-10.57%
YTD
-7.40%
6M
-7.40%
1Y
-16.38%
3Y*
18.39%
5Y*
6.60%
10Y*
2.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PLTR vs. T - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
PLTR
Palantir Technologies Inc.
-23.22%135.03%340.48%167.45%-64.74%-22.68%135.50%
T
AT&T Inc.
-7.40%13.97%44.08%-2.74%5.76%-8.09%3.49%

Correlation

The correlation between PLTR and T is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.01

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2020

0.07

The correlation between PLTR and T shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (1 year) to 0.10 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

PLTR:

$0.89

T:

$3.04

PE Ratio

PLTR:

153.57

T:

7.39

PEG Ratio

PLTR:

0.89

T:

0.31

PS Ratio

PLTR:

67.07

T:

1.29

Total Revenue (TTM)

PLTR:

$5.22B

T:

$125.65B

Gross Profit (TTM)

PLTR:

$4.39B

T:

$105.41B

EBITDA (TTM)

PLTR:

$2.01B

T:

$54.70B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PLTR vs. T — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PLTR
PLTR Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
PLTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLTR Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
PLTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLTR Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

T
T Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
T Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
T Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
T Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
T Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
T Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PLTR vs. T - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR) and AT&T Inc. (T). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PLTRTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.88

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

0.89

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.18

-0.75

+0.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.33

-1.59

+1.92

PLTR vs. T - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PLTR Sharpe Ratio is 0.14, which is higher than the T Sharpe Ratio of -0.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PLTR and T, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PLTRTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

-0.75

+0.88

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

0.28

+0.36

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.86

0.38

+0.48

Drawdowns

PLTR vs. T - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PLTR drawdown since its inception was -84.62%, which is greater than T's maximum drawdown of -64.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLTR and T.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PLTRTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-84.62%

-64.15%

-20.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-38.19%

-21.87%

-16.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-40.61%

-21.87%

-18.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-79.14%

-32.01%

-47.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-34.13%

-21.87%

-12.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-40.29%

-15.72%

-24.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

20.71%

10.34%

+10.37%

Volatility

PLTR vs. T - Volatility Comparison

Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR) has a higher volatility of 17.24% compared to AT&T Inc. (T) at 7.50%. This indicates that PLTR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than T based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PLTRTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.24%

7.50%

+9.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

38.35%

17.57%

+20.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

50.93%

21.98%

+28.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

65.44%

23.97%

+41.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

69.81%

23.71%

+46.10%

Dividends

PLTR vs. T - Dividend Comparison

PLTR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while T's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.93%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PLTR
Palantir Technologies Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
T
AT&T Inc.
4.93%4.47%4.87%6.62%6.66%8.46%7.23%5.22%7.01%5.04%4.51%5.46%

Financials

PLTR vs. T - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Palantir Technologies Inc. and AT&T Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00B20.00B30.00B40.00B20222023202420252026
1.63B
33.47B
(PLTR) Total Revenue
(T) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


PLTR and T have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PLTR has higher volatility (17.24%) compared to T (7.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PLTR dropped -84.62% vs T's -64.15%.

PLTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.14 vs -0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PLTR and T

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer