PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NFLX vs. T
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

NFLX vs. T - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) and AT&T Inc. (T). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NFLX achieves a -20.70% return, which is significantly lower than T's -8.33% return. Over the past 10 years, NFLX has outperformed T with an annualized return of 22.36%, while T has yielded a comparatively lower 2.02% annualized return.


NFLX

1D
0.91%
1M
-5.55%
6M
-15.56%
YTD
-20.70%
1Y
-40.53%
3Y*
18.22%
5Y*
6.99%
10Y*
22.36%

T

1D
2.57%
1M
-3.83%
6M
-5.16%
YTD
-8.33%
1Y
-14.60%
3Y*
23.91%
5Y*
6.50%
10Y*
2.02%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NFLX vs. T - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NFLX
Netflix, Inc.
-20.70%5.19%83.07%65.11%-51.05%11.41%67.11%20.89%39.44%55.06%
T
AT&T Inc.
-8.33%13.97%44.08%-2.74%5.76%-8.09%-21.37%45.55%-22.25%-4.01%

Correlation

The correlation between NFLX and T is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.05

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 23, 2002

0.16

The correlation between NFLX and T shifts across timeframes, from 0.05 (3 years) to 0.16 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

NFLX:

$313.07B

T:

$152.79B

EPS

NFLX:

$3.17

T:

$3.05

PE Ratio

NFLX:

23.45

T:

7.20

PEG Ratio

NFLX:

0.93

T:

0.30

PS Ratio

NFLX:

6.62

T:

1.25

Total Revenue (TTM)

NFLX:

$48.37B

T:

$125.65B

Gross Profit (TTM)

NFLX:

$23.76B

T:

$105.41B

EBITDA (TTM)

NFLX:

$30.55B

T:

$54.70B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NFLX vs. T — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NFLX
NFLX Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
NFLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NFLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
NFLX Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
NFLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
NFLX Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

T
T Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
T Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
T Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
T Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
T Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
T Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NFLX vs. T - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) and AT&T Inc. (T). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NFLXTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.78

0.91

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.92

-0.51

-0.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.60

-1.14

-0.46

NFLX vs. T - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NFLX Sharpe Ratio is -1.18, which is lower than the T Sharpe Ratio of -0.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NFLX and T, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NFLX vs. T - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NFLX drawdown since its inception was -81.99%, which is greater than T's maximum drawdown of -64.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NFLX and T.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NFLXTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-81.99%

-64.15%

-17.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-44.36%

-28.89%

-15.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-47.06%

-28.89%

-18.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-75.95%

-32.01%

-43.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-75.95%

-42.35%

-33.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-44.48%

-22.66%

-21.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.98%

-15.74%

-9.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

25.29%

12.80%

+12.49%

Volatility

NFLX vs. T - Volatility Comparison

Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) has a higher volatility of 11.74% compared to AT&T Inc. (T) at 10.04%. This indicates that NFLX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than T based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NFLXTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.74%

10.04%

+1.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.82%

19.94%

+6.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

34.37%

23.65%

+10.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

43.37%

24.40%

+18.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

41.52%

23.91%

+17.61%

Dividends

NFLX vs. T - Dividend Comparison

NFLX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while T's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.05%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NFLX
Netflix, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
T
AT&T Inc.
5.05%4.47%4.87%6.62%6.66%8.46%7.23%5.22%7.01%5.04%4.51%5.46%

Financials

NFLX vs. T - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Netflix, Inc. and AT&T Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


10.00B15.00B20.00B25.00B30.00B35.00B20222023202420252026
12.56B
33.47B
(NFLX) Total Revenue
(T) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


NFLX and T have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NFLX has higher volatility (11.74%) compared to T (10.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NFLX dropped -81.99% vs T's -64.15%.

T currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.62 vs -1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NFLX and T

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer