NFLX vs. WSM
NFLX (Netflix, Inc.) and WSM (Williams-Sonoma, Inc.) are both stocks. NFLX operates in Entertainment (Communication Services), while WSM operates in Specialty Retail (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 10 years, NFLX returned 23.92%/yr vs 27.10%/yr for WSM. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
NFLX vs. WSM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NFLX achieves a -14.31% return, which is significantly lower than WSM's 26.06% return. Over the past 10 years, NFLX has underperformed WSM with an annualized return of 23.92%, while WSM has yielded a comparatively higher 27.10% annualized return.
NFLX
- 1D
- -1.14%
- 1M
- -8.25%
- YTD
- -14.31%
- 6M
- -15.60%
- 1Y
- -33.88%
- 3Y*
- 22.62%
- 5Y*
- 10.45%
- 10Y*
- 23.92%
WSM
- 1D
- 2.19%
- 1M
- 29.92%
- YTD
- 26.06%
- 6M
- 20.02%
- 1Y
- 46.51%
- 3Y*
- 53.75%
- 5Y*
- 23.70%
- 10Y*
- 27.10%
NFLX vs. WSM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NFLX Netflix, Inc. | -14.31% | 5.19% | 83.07% | 65.11% | -51.05% | 11.41% | 67.11% | 20.89% | 39.44% | 55.06% |
WSM Williams-Sonoma, Inc. | 26.06% | -2.09% | 86.56% | 80.24% | -30.49% | 68.60% | 42.38% | 50.07% | 0.61% | 10.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between NFLX and WSM is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 23, 2002 | 0.26 |
The correlation between NFLX and WSM shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (1 year) to 0.27 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
NFLX:
$345.34B
WSM:
$26.80B
NFLX:
$3.09
WSM:
$8.93
NFLX:
25.99
WSM:
25.04
NFLX:
1.03
WSM:
5.06
NFLX:
7.41
WSM:
3.46
NFLX:
11.09
WSM:
14.33
NFLX:
$46.89B
WSM:
$7.88B
NFLX:
$22.99B
WSM:
$3.63B
NFLX:
$26.91B
WSM:
$1.49B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NFLX vs. WSM — Risk / Return Rank
NFLX
WSM
NFLX vs. WSM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) and Williams-Sonoma, Inc. (WSM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NFLX | WSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.52 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.81 | 1.23 | -0.42 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.78 | 2.01 | -2.79 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.35 | 4.55 | -5.90 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NFLX vs. WSM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NFLX drawdown since its inception was -81.99%, smaller than the maximum WSM drawdown of -89.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NFLX and WSM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NFLX | WSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.99% | -89.01% | +7.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -43.35% | -23.27% | -20.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -43.35% | -36.79% | -6.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -75.95% | -51.92% | -24.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -75.95% | -59.71% | -16.24% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -40.01% | 0.00% | -40.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.91% | -25.03% | +0.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 25.19% | 10.25% | +14.94% |
Volatility
NFLX vs. WSM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) is 5.85%, while Williams-Sonoma, Inc. (WSM) has a volatility of 12.02%. This indicates that NFLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WSM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NFLX | WSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.85% | 12.02% | -6.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.58% | 25.57% | -0.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.05% | 34.63% | -1.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.09% | 44.77% | -1.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 41.49% | 44.26% | -2.77% |
Dividends
NFLX vs. WSM - Dividend Comparison
NFLX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while WSM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.23%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NFLX Netflix, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WSM Williams-Sonoma, Inc. | 1.23% | 1.43% | 1.16% | 1.72% | 2.65% | 1.43% | 1.93% | 2.55% | 3.33% | 2.98% | 3.02% | 2.36% |
Financials
NFLX vs. WSM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Netflix, Inc. and Williams-Sonoma, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
NFLX vs. WSM - Profitability Comparison
NFLX - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Netflix, Inc. reported a gross profit of 6.36B and revenue of 12.25B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 51.9%.
WSM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Williams-Sonoma, Inc. reported a gross profit of 793.43M and revenue of 1.81B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 44.0%.
NFLX - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Netflix, Inc. reported an operating income of 3.96B and revenue of 12.25B, resulting in an operating margin of 32.3%.
WSM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Williams-Sonoma, Inc. reported an operating income of 291.69M and revenue of 1.81B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.2%.
NFLX - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Netflix, Inc. reported a net income of 5.28B and revenue of 12.25B, resulting in a net margin of 43.1%.
WSM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Williams-Sonoma, Inc. reported a net income of 231.36M and revenue of 1.81B, resulting in a net margin of 12.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
NFLX and WSM have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WSM has higher volatility (12.02%) compared to NFLX (5.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NFLX dropped -81.99% vs WSM's -89.01%.
WSM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.35 vs -1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NFLX and WSM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer