PortfoliosLab logo
COR vs. MCK
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between COR and MCK is 0.36, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

COR vs. MCK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cencora Inc. (COR) and McKesson Corporation (MCK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

COR:

1.71

MCK:

1.02

Sortino Ratio

COR:

2.17

MCK:

1.35

Omega Ratio

COR:

1.30

MCK:

1.22

Calmar Ratio

COR:

2.74

MCK:

1.11

Martin Ratio

COR:

6.42

MCK:

2.73

Ulcer Index

COR:

5.04%

MCK:

9.73%

Daily Std Dev

COR:

20.63%

MCK:

27.77%

Max Drawdown

COR:

-71.01%

MCK:

-82.83%

Current Drawdown

COR:

-4.57%

MCK:

-2.17%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

COR:

$56.47B

MCK:

$89.84B

EPS

COR:

$8.65

MCK:

$25.73

PE Ratio

COR:

33.68

MCK:

27.93

PEG Ratio

COR:

0.91

MCK:

1.14

PS Ratio

COR:

0.18

MCK:

0.25

PB Ratio

COR:

55.76

MCK:

5.04

Total Revenue (TTM)

COR:

$310.23B

MCK:

$359.05B

Gross Profit (TTM)

COR:

$10.20B

MCK:

$13.13B

EBITDA (TTM)

COR:

$3.68B

MCK:

$5.13B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COR achieves a 29.66% return, which is significantly higher than MCK's 24.83% return. Over the past 10 years, COR has underperformed MCK with an annualized return of 11.43%, while MCK has yielded a comparatively higher 12.32% annualized return.


COR

YTD

29.66%

1M

1.54%

6M

18.57%

1Y

35.00%

3Y*

25.11%

5Y*

27.03%

10Y*

11.43%

MCK

YTD

24.83%

1M

2.23%

6M

13.36%

1Y

28.09%

3Y*

30.13%

5Y*

37.54%

10Y*

12.32%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Cencora Inc.

McKesson Corporation

Risk-Adjusted Performance

COR vs. MCK — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COR
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of COR is 9191
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of COR is 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of COR is 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of COR is 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of COR is 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of COR is 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

MCK
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MCK is 8080
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MCK is 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MCK is 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MCK is 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MCK is 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MCK is 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

COR vs. MCK - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cencora Inc. (COR) and McKesson Corporation (MCK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current COR Sharpe Ratio is 1.71, which is higher than the MCK Sharpe Ratio of 1.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COR and MCK, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

COR vs. MCK - Dividend Comparison

COR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%, more than MCK's 0.39% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
COR
Cencora Inc.
0.74%0.93%0.96%1.13%1.34%1.74%1.88%2.07%1.61%1.77%1.17%1.10%
MCK
McKesson Corporation
0.39%0.47%0.50%0.54%0.72%0.95%1.16%1.32%0.80%0.80%0.53%0.46%

Drawdowns

COR vs. MCK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COR drawdown since its inception was -71.01%, smaller than the maximum MCK drawdown of -82.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COR and MCK. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

COR vs. MCK - Volatility Comparison

Cencora Inc. (COR) has a higher volatility of 9.67% compared to McKesson Corporation (MCK) at 7.23%. This indicates that COR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MCK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

COR vs. MCK - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cencora Inc. and McKesson Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


50.00B60.00B70.00B80.00B90.00B100.00B20212022202320242025
75.45B
90.82B
(COR) Total Revenue
(MCK) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

COR vs. MCK - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Cencora Inc. and McKesson Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

2.5%3.0%3.5%4.0%4.5%5.0%5.5%6.0%20212022202320242025
4.1%
4.0%
(COR) Gross Margin
(MCK) Gross Margin
COR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Cencora Inc. reported a gross profit of 3.06B and revenue of 75.45B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 4.1%.

MCK - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, McKesson Corporation reported a gross profit of 3.64B and revenue of 90.82B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 4.0%.

COR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Cencora Inc. reported an operating income of 1.04B and revenue of 75.45B, resulting in an operating margin of 1.4%.

MCK - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, McKesson Corporation reported an operating income of 1.59B and revenue of 90.82B, resulting in an operating margin of 1.8%.

COR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Cencora Inc. reported a net income of 717.87M and revenue of 75.45B, resulting in a net margin of 1.0%.

MCK - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, McKesson Corporation reported a net income of 1.26B and revenue of 90.82B, resulting in a net margin of 1.4%.