PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KR vs. T
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

KR vs. T - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Kroger Co. (KR) and AT&T Inc. (T). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KR achieves a 1.81% return, which is significantly higher than T's -7.40% return. Over the past 10 years, KR has outperformed T with an annualized return of 7.71%, while T has yielded a comparatively lower 2.86% annualized return.


KR

1D
-0.96%
1M
-3.58%
YTD
1.81%
6M
0.36%
1Y
-2.84%
3Y*
13.36%
5Y*
12.84%
10Y*
7.71%

T

1D
-1.10%
1M
-10.57%
YTD
-7.40%
6M
-7.40%
1Y
-16.38%
3Y*
18.39%
5Y*
6.60%
10Y*
2.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KR vs. T - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
KR
The Kroger Co.
1.81%4.25%36.91%4.99%0.44%45.41%11.90%7.90%2.08%-18.97%
T
AT&T Inc.
-7.40%13.97%44.08%-2.74%5.76%-8.09%-21.37%45.55%-22.25%-4.01%

Correlation

The correlation between KR and T is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 20, 1984

0.25

Fundamentals

EPS

KR:

$1.20

T:

$3.04

PE Ratio

KR:

52.67

T:

7.39

PEG Ratio

KR:

7.64

T:

0.31

PS Ratio

KR:

0.28

T:

1.29

Total Revenue (TTM)

KR:

$147.23B

T:

$125.65B

Gross Profit (TTM)

KR:

$33.42B

T:

$105.41B

EBITDA (TTM)

KR:

$5.29B

T:

$54.70B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KR vs. T — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KR
KR Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
KR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KR Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
KR Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
KR Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
KR Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

T
T Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
T Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
T Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
T Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
T Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
T Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KR vs. T - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Kroger Co. (KR) and AT&T Inc. (T). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


KRTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

0.89

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.15

-0.75

+0.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.29

-1.59

+1.30

KR vs. T - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KR Sharpe Ratio is -0.10, which is higher than the T Sharpe Ratio of -0.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KR and T, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KRTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.10

-0.75

+0.65

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

0.28

+0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

0.12

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.36

0.38

-0.02

Drawdowns

KR vs. T - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KR drawdown since its inception was -66.81%, roughly equal to the maximum T drawdown of -64.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KR and T.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KRTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.81%

-64.15%

-2.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.44%

-21.87%

+2.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.44%

-21.87%

+2.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.07%

-32.01%

+0.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.25%

-42.35%

-3.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.28%

-21.87%

+5.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.44%

-15.72%

-6.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.96%

10.34%

-0.38%

Volatility

KR vs. T - Volatility Comparison

The Kroger Co. (KR) has a higher volatility of 9.14% compared to AT&T Inc. (T) at 7.50%. This indicates that KR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than T based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KRTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.14%

7.50%

+1.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.12%

17.57%

+2.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.52%

21.98%

+5.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.86%

23.97%

+2.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.95%

23.71%

+5.24%

Dividends

KR vs. T - Dividend Comparison

KR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.22%, less than T's 4.93% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KR
The Kroger Co.
2.22%2.14%2.00%2.41%2.11%1.72%2.14%2.07%1.93%1.79%1.30%0.94%
T
AT&T Inc.
4.93%4.47%4.87%6.62%6.66%8.46%7.23%5.22%7.01%5.04%4.51%5.46%

Financials

KR vs. T - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Kroger Co. and AT&T Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


30.00B35.00B40.00B45.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
33.86B
33.47B
(KR) Total Revenue
(T) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


KR and T have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KR has higher volatility (9.14%) compared to T (7.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KR dropped -66.81% vs T's -64.15%.

KR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.10 vs -0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KR and T

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer