PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NVDA vs. KR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

NVDA vs. KR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) and The Kroger Co. (KR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NVDA achieves a 12.01% return, which is significantly higher than KR's 1.81% return. Over the past 10 years, NVDA has outperformed KR with an annualized return of 68.47%, while KR has yielded a comparatively lower 7.71% annualized return.


NVDA

1D
1.73%
1M
-2.94%
YTD
12.01%
6M
12.58%
1Y
47.43%
3Y*
75.35%
5Y*
64.54%
10Y*
68.47%

KR

1D
-0.96%
1M
-3.58%
YTD
1.81%
6M
0.36%
1Y
-2.84%
3Y*
13.36%
5Y*
12.84%
10Y*
7.71%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NVDA vs. KR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
12.01%38.92%171.25%239.02%-50.26%125.48%122.30%76.94%-30.82%81.99%
KR
The Kroger Co.
1.81%4.25%36.91%4.99%0.44%45.41%11.90%7.90%2.08%-18.97%

Correlation

The correlation between NVDA and KR is -0.31, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.10

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 25, 1999

0.12

The correlation between NVDA and KR shifts across timeframes, from -0.31 (1 year) to 0.12 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

NVDA:

$6.53

KR:

$1.20

PE Ratio

NVDA:

31.97

KR:

52.67

PEG Ratio

NVDA:

0.18

KR:

7.64

PS Ratio

NVDA:

20.13

KR:

0.28

Total Revenue (TTM)

NVDA:

$253.49B

KR:

$147.23B

Gross Profit (TTM)

NVDA:

$187.95B

KR:

$33.42B

EBITDA (TTM)

NVDA:

$192.76B

KR:

$5.29B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NVDA vs. KR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NVDA
NVDA Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
NVDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVDA Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
NVDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVDA Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

KR
KR Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
KR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KR Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
KR Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
KR Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
KR Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NVDA vs. KR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) and The Kroger Co. (KR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NVDAKRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.90

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.01

+0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.36

-0.15

+2.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.73

-0.29

+6.02

NVDA vs. KR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NVDA Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is higher than the KR Sharpe Ratio of -0.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NVDA and KR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NVDAKRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.37

-0.10

+1.48

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.25

0.48

+0.77

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.38

0.27

+1.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

0.36

+0.27

Drawdowns

NVDA vs. KR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NVDA drawdown since its inception was -89.72%, which is greater than KR's maximum drawdown of -66.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVDA and KR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NVDAKRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-89.72%

-66.81%

-22.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.21%

-19.44%

-0.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.88%

-19.44%

-17.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-66.34%

-31.07%

-35.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.34%

-46.25%

-20.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.39%

-16.28%

+4.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-36.20%

-22.44%

-13.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.30%

9.96%

-1.66%

Volatility

NVDA vs. KR - Volatility Comparison

NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) has a higher volatility of 13.14% compared to The Kroger Co. (KR) at 9.14%. This indicates that NVDA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NVDAKRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.14%

9.14%

+4.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.37%

20.12%

+6.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

34.81%

27.52%

+7.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

51.75%

26.86%

+24.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

49.85%

28.95%

+20.90%

Dividends

NVDA vs. KR - Dividend Comparison

NVDA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%, less than KR's 2.22% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KR
The Kroger Co.
2.22%2.14%2.00%2.41%2.11%1.72%2.14%2.07%1.93%1.79%1.30%0.94%
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
0.14%0.02%0.03%0.03%0.11%0.05%0.12%0.27%0.46%0.29%0.45%1.20%

Financials

NVDA vs. KR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between NVIDIA Corporation and The Kroger Co.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B20222023202420252026
81.62B
33.86B
(NVDA) Total Revenue
(KR) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

NVDA vs. KR - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between NVIDIA Corporation and The Kroger Co. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
74.9%
21.0%
Portfolio components
NVDA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported a gross profit of 61.16B and revenue of 81.62B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.9%.

KR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Kroger Co. reported a gross profit of 7.12B and revenue of 33.86B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 21.0%.

NVDA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported an operating income of 53.54B and revenue of 81.62B, resulting in an operating margin of 65.6%.

KR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Kroger Co. reported an operating income of -1.54B and revenue of 33.86B, resulting in an operating margin of -4.6%.

NVDA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported a net income of 58.32B and revenue of 81.62B, resulting in a net margin of 71.5%.

KR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Kroger Co. reported a net income of -1.32B and revenue of 33.86B, resulting in a net margin of -3.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


NVDA and KR have a correlation of -0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NVDA has higher volatility (13.14%) compared to KR (9.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NVDA dropped -89.72% vs KR's -66.81%.

NVDA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.37 vs -0.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NVDA and KR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer