CME vs. NRG
CME (CME Group Inc.) and NRG (NRG Energy, Inc.) are both stocks. CME operates in Financial Data & Stock Exchanges (Financial Services), while NRG operates in Utilities - Independent Power Producers (Utilities). Over the past 10 years, CME returned 15.38%/yr vs 26.90%/yr for NRG. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CME vs. NRG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CME achieves a 1.58% return, which is significantly higher than NRG's -20.72% return. Over the past 10 years, CME has underperformed NRG with an annualized return of 15.38%, while NRG has yielded a comparatively higher 26.90% annualized return.
CME
- 1D
- 2.80%
- 1M
- -8.82%
- YTD
- 1.58%
- 6M
- 1.41%
- 1Y
- 3.34%
- 3Y*
- 19.92%
- 5Y*
- 9.17%
- 10Y*
- 15.38%
NRG
- 1D
- 1.43%
- 1M
- -4.28%
- YTD
- -20.72%
- 6M
- -21.80%
- 1Y
- -15.96%
- 3Y*
- 57.21%
- 5Y*
- 30.96%
- 10Y*
- 26.90%
CME vs. NRG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CME CME Group Inc. | 1.58% | 19.83% | 15.41% | 31.32% | -22.89% | 29.47% | -6.34% | 9.67% | 32.15% | 32.35% |
NRG NRG Energy, Inc. | -20.72% | 78.91% | 78.58% | 69.36% | -23.47% | 18.54% | -2.14% | 0.69% | 39.59% | 133.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between CME and NRG is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 2, 2003 | 0.20 |
The correlation between CME and NRG shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (1 year) to 0.20 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CME:
$97.90B
NRG:
$26.10B
CME:
$11.75
NRG:
$1.21
CME:
22.94
NRG:
103.60
CME:
2.00
NRG:
1.56
CME:
14.40
NRG:
0.76
CME:
3.68
NRG:
6.18
CME:
$6.76B
NRG:
$32.38B
CME:
$5.84B
NRG:
$4.69B
CME:
$5.69B
NRG:
$2.57B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CME vs. NRG — Risk / Return Rank
CME
NRG
CME vs. NRG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CME Group Inc. (CME) and NRG Energy, Inc. (NRG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CME | NRG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.57 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 0.97 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.16 | -0.47 | +0.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.50 | -1.16 | +1.66 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CME vs. NRG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CME drawdown since its inception was -77.50%, roughly equal to the maximum NRG drawdown of -79.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CME and NRG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CME | NRG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.50% | -79.41% | +1.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.42% | -34.24% | +12.82% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.42% | -34.24% | +12.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.74% | -34.24% | +2.50% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.36% | -48.76% | +11.40% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.03% | -31.61% | +16.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.68% | -27.99% | +7.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.70% | 13.73% | -7.03% |
Volatility
CME vs. NRG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for CME Group Inc. (CME) is 10.45%, while NRG Energy, Inc. (NRG) has a volatility of 15.26%. This indicates that CME experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NRG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CME | NRG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.45% | 15.26% | -4.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.44% | 35.10% | -17.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.74% | 44.88% | -24.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.15% | 40.03% | -19.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.93% | 39.16% | -15.23% |
Dividends
CME vs. NRG - Dividend Comparison
CME's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.17%, more than NRG's 1.46% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CME CME Group Inc. | 4.17% | 1.83% | 4.48% | 4.58% | 5.05% | 3.00% | 3.24% | 2.74% | 2.42% | 4.20% | 4.90% | 5.41% |
NRG NRG Energy, Inc. | 1.46% | 1.11% | 1.81% | 2.92% | 4.40% | 3.02% | 3.20% | 0.30% | 0.30% | 0.42% | 1.92% | 4.93% |
Financials
CME vs. NRG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CME Group Inc. and NRG Energy, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CME vs. NRG - Profitability Comparison
CME - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CME Group Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.66B and revenue of 1.88B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 88.1%.
NRG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NRG Energy, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 10.26B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
CME - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CME Group Inc. reported an operating income of 1.31B and revenue of 1.88B, resulting in an operating margin of 69.7%.
NRG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NRG Energy, Inc. reported an operating income of 328.00M and revenue of 10.26B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.2%.
CME - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CME Group Inc. reported a net income of 1.15B and revenue of 1.88B, resulting in a net margin of 61.4%.
NRG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NRG Energy, Inc. reported a net income of 125.00M and revenue of 10.26B, resulting in a net margin of 1.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CME and NRG have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NRG has higher volatility (15.26%) compared to CME (10.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CME dropped -77.50% vs NRG's -79.41%.
CME currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.16 vs -0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CME and NRG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer