PWR vs. VST
PWR (Quanta Services, Inc.) and VST (Vistra Corp.) are both stocks. PWR operates in Engineering & Construction (Industrials), while VST operates in Utilities - Independent Power Producers (Utilities). Over the past 5 years, PWR returned 50.60%/yr vs 54.40%/yr for VST. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PWR vs. VST - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PWR achieves a 67.76% return, which is significantly higher than VST's -8.13% return.
PWR
- 1D
- 3.58%
- 1M
- -8.53%
- YTD
- 67.76%
- 6M
- 61.62%
- 1Y
- 97.52%
- 3Y*
- 56.60%
- 5Y*
- 50.60%
- 10Y*
- 41.17%
VST
- 1D
- 1.12%
- 1M
- 3.79%
- YTD
- -8.13%
- 6M
- -12.74%
- 1Y
- -14.43%
- 3Y*
- 83.39%
- 5Y*
- 54.40%
- 10Y*
- —
PWR vs. VST - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PWR Quanta Services, Inc. | 67.76% | 33.70% | 46.60% | 51.70% | 24.63% | 59.50% | 77.74% | 35.84% | -22.93% | 12.22% |
VST Vistra Corp. | -8.13% | 17.66% | 261.52% | 70.73% | 5.08% | 19.57% | -11.87% | 2.46% | 24.95% | 18.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between PWR and VST is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 4, 2016 | 0.38 |
The correlation between PWR and VST shifts across timeframes, from 0.38 (all time) to 0.51 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
PWR:
$7.29
VST:
$8.60
PWR:
97.08
VST:
17.20
PWR:
4.81
VST:
0.39
PWR:
3.58
VST:
2.19
PWR:
$29.99B
VST:
$17.20B
PWR:
$4.08B
VST:
$1.12B
PWR:
$2.40B
VST:
$4.34B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PWR vs. VST — Risk / Return Rank
PWR
VST
PWR vs. VST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR) and Vistra Corp. (VST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PWR | VST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.94 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.43 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 0.99 | +0.46 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.73 | -0.38 | +6.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.09 | -0.70 | +18.78 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PWR vs. VST - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PWR drawdown since its inception was -97.07%, which is greater than VST's maximum drawdown of -53.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PWR and VST.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PWR | VST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.07% | -53.32% | -43.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.11% | -38.01% | +20.90% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.89% | -48.80% | +14.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.89% | -48.80% | +14.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.53% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.87% | -31.89% | +22.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -46.84% | -13.72% | -33.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.41% | 20.73% | -15.32% |
Volatility
PWR vs. VST - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR) is 13.07%, while Vistra Corp. (VST) has a volatility of 15.14%. This indicates that PWR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PWR | VST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.07% | 15.14% | -2.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.74% | 37.96% | -7.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.12% | 48.75% | -11.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.79% | 47.97% | -12.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.78% | 42.22% | -8.44% |
Dividends
PWR vs. VST - Dividend Comparison
PWR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%, less than VST's 0.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PWR Quanta Services, Inc. | 0.06% | 0.09% | 0.09% | 0.15% | 0.25% | 0.16% | 0.29% | 0.42% | 0.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VST Vistra Corp. | 0.61% | 0.56% | 0.63% | 2.13% | 3.12% | 2.64% | 2.75% | 2.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 14.97% |
Financials
PWR vs. VST - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Quanta Services, Inc. and Vistra Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
PWR vs. VST - Profitability Comparison
PWR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Quanta Services, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.11B and revenue of 7.87B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 14.1%.
VST - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vistra Corp. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 5.64B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
PWR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Quanta Services, Inc. reported an operating income of 338.78M and revenue of 7.87B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.3%.
VST - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vistra Corp. reported an operating income of 1.50B and revenue of 5.64B, resulting in an operating margin of 26.6%.
PWR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Quanta Services, Inc. reported a net income of 220.63M and revenue of 7.87B, resulting in a net margin of 2.8%.
VST - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vistra Corp. reported a net income of 980.00M and revenue of 5.64B, resulting in a net margin of 17.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
PWR and VST have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VST has higher volatility (15.14%) compared to PWR (13.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PWR dropped -97.07% vs VST's -53.32%.
PWR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs -0.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PWR and VST
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer