PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MCK vs. T
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MCK vs. T - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in McKesson Corporation (MCK) and AT&T Inc. (T). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MCK achieves a -6.36% return, which is significantly higher than T's -7.40% return. Over the past 10 years, MCK has outperformed T with an annualized return of 16.13%, while T has yielded a comparatively lower 2.86% annualized return.


MCK

1D
-1.16%
1M
4.27%
YTD
-6.36%
6M
-3.74%
1Y
7.98%
3Y*
25.42%
5Y*
32.82%
10Y*
16.13%

T

1D
-1.10%
1M
-10.57%
YTD
-7.40%
6M
-7.40%
1Y
-16.38%
3Y*
18.39%
5Y*
6.60%
10Y*
2.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MCK vs. T - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MCK
McKesson Corporation
-6.36%44.54%23.67%24.13%51.82%44.23%27.06%26.72%-28.40%11.95%
T
AT&T Inc.
-7.40%13.97%44.08%-2.74%5.76%-8.09%-21.37%45.55%-22.25%-4.01%

Correlation

The correlation between MCK and T is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 1994

0.24

The correlation between MCK and T shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (1 year) to 0.27 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

MCK:

$38.38

T:

$3.04

PE Ratio

MCK:

19.97

T:

7.39

PEG Ratio

MCK:

0.27

T:

0.31

PS Ratio

MCK:

0.24

T:

1.29

Total Revenue (TTM)

MCK:

$403.43B

T:

$125.65B

Gross Profit (TTM)

MCK:

$14.55B

T:

$105.41B

EBITDA (TTM)

MCK:

$6.91B

T:

$54.70B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MCK vs. T — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MCK
MCK Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
MCK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MCK Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
MCK Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
MCK Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
MCK Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

T
T Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
T Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
T Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
T Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
T Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
T Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MCK vs. T - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for McKesson Corporation (MCK) and AT&T Inc. (T). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MCKTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

0.89

+0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.29

-0.75

+1.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.79

-1.59

+2.38

MCK vs. T - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MCK Sharpe Ratio is 0.28, which is higher than the T Sharpe Ratio of -0.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MCK and T, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MCKTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

-0.75

+1.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.36

0.28

+1.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

0.12

+0.44

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.38

+0.07

Drawdowns

MCK vs. T - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MCK drawdown since its inception was -82.84%, which is greater than T's maximum drawdown of -64.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MCK and T.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MCKTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.84%

-64.15%

-18.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-27.17%

-21.87%

-5.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.17%

-21.87%

-5.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.17%

-32.01%

+4.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.23%

-42.35%

-1.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-22.92%

-21.87%

-1.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.65%

-15.72%

-12.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.06%

10.34%

-0.28%

Volatility

MCK vs. T - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for McKesson Corporation (MCK) is 6.94%, while AT&T Inc. (T) has a volatility of 7.50%. This indicates that MCK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than T based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MCKTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.94%

7.50%

-0.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.76%

17.57%

+5.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.16%

21.98%

+7.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.20%

23.97%

+0.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.82%

23.71%

+5.11%

Dividends

MCK vs. T - Dividend Comparison

MCK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.43%, less than T's 4.93% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MCK
McKesson Corporation
0.43%0.37%0.47%0.50%0.54%0.72%0.95%1.16%1.32%0.80%0.80%0.53%
T
AT&T Inc.
4.93%4.47%4.87%6.62%6.66%8.46%7.23%5.22%7.01%5.04%4.51%5.46%

Financials

MCK vs. T - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between McKesson Corporation and AT&T Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


20.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B100.00B20222023202420252026
96.30B
33.47B
(MCK) Total Revenue
(T) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


MCK and T have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

T has higher volatility (7.50%) compared to MCK (6.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MCK dropped -82.84% vs T's -64.15%.

MCK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.28 vs -0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MCK and T

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer