PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HWM vs. T
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

HWM vs. T - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Howmet Aerospace Inc. (HWM) and AT&T Inc. (T). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HWM achieves a 36.22% return, which is significantly higher than T's -5.73% return. Over the past 10 years, HWM has outperformed T with an annualized return of 32.00%, while T has yielded a comparatively lower 2.24% annualized return.


HWM

1D
2.58%
1M
0.48%
6M
26.74%
YTD
36.22%
1Y
48.87%
3Y*
77.98%
5Y*
54.34%
10Y*
32.00%
ALL TIME*
7.54%

T

1D
1.41%
1M
4.07%
6M
-1.30%
YTD
-5.73%
1Y
-13.56%
3Y*
21.50%
5Y*
7.35%
10Y*
2.24%
ALL TIME*
9.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HWM vs. T - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HWM
Howmet Aerospace Inc.
36.22%87.95%102.71%37.84%24.16%11.67%21.03%83.54%-37.43%48.40%
T
AT&T Inc.
-5.73%13.97%44.08%-2.74%5.76%-8.09%-21.37%45.55%-22.25%-4.01%

Correlation

The correlation between HWM and T is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.03

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 19, 1984

0.27

The correlation between HWM and T shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (1 year) to 0.27 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

HWM:

$111.63B

T:

$154.67B

EPS

HWM:

$4.32

T:

$3.05

PE Ratio

HWM:

64.63

T:

7.30

PEG Ratio

HWM:

1.09

T:

0.30

PS Ratio

HWM:

13.07

T:

1.27

Total Revenue (TTM)

HWM:

$8.62B

T:

$125.65B

Gross Profit (TTM)

HWM:

$2.81B

T:

$105.41B

EBITDA (TTM)

HWM:

$2.66B

T:

$54.70B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HWM vs. T — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HWM
HWM Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
HWM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HWM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
HWM Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
HWM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
HWM Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

T
T Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
T Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
T Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
T Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
T Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
T Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HWM vs. T - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Howmet Aerospace Inc. (HWM) and AT&T Inc. (T). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HWMTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

0.92

+0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.09

-0.47

+3.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.66

-1.04

+9.70

HWM vs. T - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HWM Sharpe Ratio is 1.58, which is higher than the T Sharpe Ratio of -0.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HWM and T, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HWM vs. T - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HWM drawdown since its inception was -88.30%, which is greater than T's maximum drawdown of -64.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HWM and T.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HWMTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-88.30%

-64.15%

-24.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.89%

-28.89%

+13.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.41%

-28.89%

+9.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.14%

-32.01%

+11.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.81%

-42.35%

-22.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.49%

-20.46%

+18.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-30.96%

-15.74%

-15.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.66%

13.01%

-7.35%

Volatility

HWM vs. T - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Howmet Aerospace Inc. (HWM) is 6.64%, while AT&T Inc. (T) has a volatility of 9.45%. This indicates that HWM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than T based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HWMTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.64%

9.45%

-2.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.86%

19.94%

+4.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.15%

23.72%

+7.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.03%

24.39%

+7.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

39.65%

23.92%

+15.73%

Dividends

HWM vs. T - Dividend Comparison

HWM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.17%, less than T's 6.49% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HWM
Howmet Aerospace Inc.
0.17%0.21%0.24%0.31%0.25%0.13%0.05%0.39%1.42%0.88%40.49%1.22%
T
AT&T Inc.
6.49%4.47%4.87%6.62%6.66%8.46%7.23%5.22%7.01%5.04%4.51%5.46%

Financials

HWM vs. T - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Howmet Aerospace Inc. and AT&T Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00B20.00B30.00B40.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
2.31B
33.47B
(HWM) Total Revenue
(T) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


HWM and T have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

T has higher volatility (9.45%) compared to HWM (6.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HWM dropped -88.30% vs T's -64.15%.

HWM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.58 vs -0.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HWM and T

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer