PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WRB vs. NFLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

WRB vs. NFLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in W. R. Berkley Corporation (WRB) and Netflix, Inc. (NFLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WRB achieves a -2.51% return, which is significantly higher than NFLX's -14.31% return. Over the past 10 years, WRB has underperformed NFLX with an annualized return of 17.92%, while NFLX has yielded a comparatively higher 23.92% annualized return.


WRB

1D
1.08%
1M
2.74%
YTD
-2.51%
6M
0.17%
1Y
-4.36%
3Y*
24.41%
5Y*
17.90%
10Y*
17.92%

NFLX

1D
-1.14%
1M
-7.68%
YTD
-14.31%
6M
-15.60%
1Y
-33.72%
3Y*
22.62%
5Y*
10.45%
10Y*
23.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WRB vs. NFLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WRB
W. R. Berkley Corporation
-2.51%23.02%27.19%0.25%33.92%27.39%-3.14%43.80%5.96%10.21%
NFLX
Netflix, Inc.
-14.31%5.19%83.07%65.11%-51.05%11.41%67.11%20.89%39.44%55.06%

Correlation

The correlation between WRB and NFLX is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 23, 2002

0.17

The correlation between WRB and NFLX shifts across timeframes, from 0.00 (3 years) to 0.17 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

WRB:

$4.45

NFLX:

$3.09

PE Ratio

WRB:

15.34

NFLX:

25.99

PEG Ratio

WRB:

0.89

NFLX:

1.03

PS Ratio

WRB:

1.86

NFLX:

7.41

Total Revenue (TTM)

WRB:

$14.71B

NFLX:

$46.89B

Gross Profit (TTM)

WRB:

$2.91B

NFLX:

$22.99B

EBITDA (TTM)

WRB:

$2.37B

NFLX:

$26.91B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WRB vs. NFLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WRB
WRB Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
WRB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WRB Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
WRB Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
WRB Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
WRB Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

NFLX
NFLX Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
NFLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NFLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
NFLX Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
NFLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
NFLX Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WRB vs. NFLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for W. R. Berkley Corporation (WRB) and Netflix, Inc. (NFLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WRBNFLXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.79

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.98

0.81

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.29

-0.78

+0.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.54

-1.35

+0.81

WRB vs. NFLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WRB Sharpe Ratio is -0.24, which is higher than the NFLX Sharpe Ratio of -1.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WRB and NFLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WRB vs. NFLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WRB drawdown since its inception was -69.33%, smaller than the maximum NFLX drawdown of -81.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WRB and NFLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WRBNFLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.33%

-81.99%

+12.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.62%

-43.35%

+25.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.62%

-43.35%

+25.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.29%

-75.95%

+49.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.35%

-75.95%

+30.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.49%

-40.01%

+28.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.58%

-24.91%

+10.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.29%

25.19%

-15.90%

Volatility

WRB vs. NFLX - Volatility Comparison

W. R. Berkley Corporation (WRB) has a higher volatility of 7.63% compared to Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) at 5.85%. This indicates that WRB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NFLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WRBNFLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.63%

5.85%

+1.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.08%

24.58%

-9.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.37%

33.05%

-11.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.83%

43.09%

-20.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.56%

41.49%

-16.93%

Dividends

WRB vs. NFLX - Dividend Comparison

WRB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.72%, while NFLX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NFLX
Netflix, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
WRB
W. R. Berkley Corporation
2.72%2.64%2.39%2.73%1.22%2.44%0.71%2.43%2.83%2.16%2.27%0.86%

Financials

WRB vs. NFLX - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between W. R. Berkley Corporation and Netflix, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


2.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B12.00B20222023202420252026
3.72B
12.25B
(WRB) Total Revenue
(NFLX) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

WRB vs. NFLX - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between W. R. Berkley Corporation and Netflix, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%20222023202420252026
20.6%
51.9%
Portfolio components
WRB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, W. R. Berkley Corporation reported a gross profit of 765.46M and revenue of 3.72B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 20.6%.

NFLX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Netflix, Inc. reported a gross profit of 6.36B and revenue of 12.25B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 51.9%.

WRB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, W. R. Berkley Corporation reported an operating income of 606.51M and revenue of 3.72B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.3%.

NFLX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Netflix, Inc. reported an operating income of 3.96B and revenue of 12.25B, resulting in an operating margin of 32.3%.

WRB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, W. R. Berkley Corporation reported a net income of 449.51M and revenue of 3.72B, resulting in a net margin of 12.1%.

NFLX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Netflix, Inc. reported a net income of 5.28B and revenue of 12.25B, resulting in a net margin of 43.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


WRB and NFLX have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WRB has higher volatility (7.63%) compared to NFLX (5.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WRB dropped -69.33% vs NFLX's -81.99%.

WRB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.24 vs -1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WRB and NFLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer