RL vs. T

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

RL (Ralph Lauren Corporation) and T (AT&T Inc.) are both stocks. RL operates in Apparel Manufacturing (Consumer Cyclical), while T operates in Telecom Services (Communication Services). Over the past 10 years, RL returned 18.35%/yr vs 3.33%/yr for T. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

RL vs. T - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ralph Lauren Corporation (RL) and AT&T Inc. (T). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RL achieves a 14.56% return, which is significantly higher than T's -2.96% return. Over the past 10 years, RL has outperformed T with an annualized return of 18.35%, while T has yielded a comparatively lower 3.33% annualized return.

RL

• 1D: 2.72%
• 1M: 23.61%
• YTD: 14.56%
• 6M: 9.70%
• 1Y: 57.07%
• 3Y*: 52.12%
• 5Y*: 29.57%
• 10Y*: 18.35%

T

• 1D: 2.52%
• 1M: -1.87%
• YTD: -2.96%
• 6M: -1.93%
• 1Y: -12.71%
• 3Y*: 20.58%
• 5Y*: 7.38%
• 10Y*: 3.33%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RL vs. T - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RL Ralph Lauren Corporation	14.56%	55.03%	62.85%	39.82%	-8.41%	16.66%	-10.63%	16.07%	1.82%	17.53%
T AT&T Inc.	-2.96%	13.97%	44.08%	-2.74%	5.76%	-8.09%	-21.37%	45.55%	-22.25%	-4.01%

Correlation

The correlation between RL and T is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.02
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.02
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.16
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.23
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 1997	0.25

The correlation between RL and T shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (1 year) to 0.25 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS RL : $15.08 T : $3.04
PE Ratio RL : 26.79 T : 7.74
PEG Ratio RL : 1.49 T : 0.32
PS Ratio RL : 3.11 T : 1.35
Total Revenue (TTM) RL : $8.11B T : $125.65B
Gross Profit (TTM) RL : $5.67B T : $105.41B
EBITDA (TTM) RL : $1.18B T : $54.70B

Return for Risk

RL vs. T — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RL

RL Risk / Return Rank: 83
RL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
RL Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
RL Omega Ratio Rank: 78
RL Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
RL Martin Ratio Rank: 88

T

T Risk / Return Rank: 18
T Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
T Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
T Omega Ratio Rank: 18
T Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
T Martin Ratio Rank: 15

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RL vs. T - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ralph Lauren Corporation (RL) and AT&T Inc. (T). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RL	T	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.54	-0.59	+2.13
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.29	-0.72	+3.01
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	0.92	+0.36
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.01	-0.59	+3.61
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.65	-1.22	+10.87

RL vs. T - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RL Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is higher than the T Sharpe Ratio of -0.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RL and T, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RL vs. T - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RL drawdown since its inception was -68.62%, which is greater than T's maximum drawdown of -64.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RL and T.

Drawdown Indicators

	RL	T	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-68.62%	-64.15%	-4.47%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.67%	-21.87%	+4.20%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-36.18%	-21.87%	-14.31%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-36.51%	-32.01%	-4.50%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-55.14%	-42.35%	-12.79%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-18.12%	+18.12%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-24.11%	-15.72%	-8.39%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.50%	10.64%	-5.14%

Volatility

RL vs. T - Volatility Comparison

Ralph Lauren Corporation (RL) has a higher volatility of 16.13% compared to AT&T Inc. (T) at 8.21%. This indicates that RL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than T based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RL	T	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	16.13%	8.21%	+7.92%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	27.42%	17.80%	+9.62%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	34.57%	22.13%	+12.44%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	37.11%	24.01%	+13.10%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	38.73%	23.73%	+15.00%

Dividends

RL vs. T - Dividend Comparison

RL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%, less than T's 4.71% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
RL Ralph Lauren Corporation	0.90%	1.01%	1.40%	2.08%	2.78%	1.74%	0.66%	2.29%	2.30%	1.93%	2.21%	1.79%
T AT&T Inc.	4.71%	4.47%	4.87%	6.62%	6.66%	8.46%	7.23%	5.22%	7.01%	5.04%	4.51%	5.46%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RL and T in my portfolio?

RL and T have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RL or T?

RL has higher volatility (16.13%) compared to T (8.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RL dropped -68.62% vs T's -64.15%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.54 vs -0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.