T vs. PWR
T (AT&T Inc.) and PWR (Quanta Services, Inc.) are both stocks. T operates in Telecom Services (Communication Services), while PWR operates in Engineering & Construction (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, T returned 3.33%/yr vs 41.17%/yr for PWR. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
T vs. PWR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, T achieves a -2.96% return, which is significantly lower than PWR's 67.76% return. Over the past 10 years, T has underperformed PWR with an annualized return of 3.33%, while PWR has yielded a comparatively higher 41.17% annualized return.
T
- 1D
- 2.52%
- 1M
- -1.87%
- YTD
- -2.96%
- 6M
- -1.93%
- 1Y
- -12.71%
- 3Y*
- 20.58%
- 5Y*
- 7.38%
- 10Y*
- 3.33%
PWR
- 1D
- 3.58%
- 1M
- -9.27%
- YTD
- 67.76%
- 6M
- 61.62%
- 1Y
- 97.74%
- 3Y*
- 56.60%
- 5Y*
- 50.60%
- 10Y*
- 41.17%
T vs. PWR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
T AT&T Inc. | -2.96% | 13.97% | 44.08% | -2.74% | 5.76% | -8.09% | -21.37% | 45.55% | -22.25% | -4.01% |
PWR Quanta Services, Inc. | 67.76% | 33.70% | 46.60% | 51.70% | 24.63% | 59.50% | 77.74% | 35.84% | -22.93% | 12.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between T and PWR is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.08 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 12, 1998 | 0.25 |
The correlation between T and PWR shifts across timeframes, from -0.18 (1 year) to 0.25 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
T:
$3.04
PWR:
$7.29
T:
7.74
PWR:
97.08
T:
0.32
PWR:
4.81
T:
1.35
PWR:
3.58
T:
$125.65B
PWR:
$29.99B
T:
$105.41B
PWR:
$4.08B
T:
$54.70B
PWR:
$2.40B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
T vs. PWR — Risk / Return Rank
T
PWR
T vs. PWR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AT&T Inc. (T) and Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| T | PWR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | 1.44 | -0.53 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.59 | 5.73 | -6.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.22 | 18.09 | -19.31 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
T vs. PWR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum T drawdown since its inception was -64.15%, smaller than the maximum PWR drawdown of -97.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for T and PWR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| T | PWR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.15% | -97.07% | +32.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.87% | -17.11% | -4.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.87% | -33.89% | +12.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.01% | -33.89% | +1.88% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.35% | -45.53% | +3.18% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.12% | -9.87% | -8.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.72% | -46.84% | +31.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.64% | 5.41% | +5.23% |
Volatility
T vs. PWR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AT&T Inc. (T) is 8.21%, while Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR) has a volatility of 13.07%. This indicates that T experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PWR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| T | PWR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.21% | 13.07% | -4.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.80% | 30.74% | -12.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.13% | 37.12% | -14.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.01% | 35.79% | -11.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.73% | 33.78% | -10.05% |
Dividends
T vs. PWR - Dividend Comparison
T's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.71%, more than PWR's 0.06% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PWR Quanta Services, Inc. | 0.06% | 0.09% | 0.09% | 0.15% | 0.25% | 0.16% | 0.29% | 0.42% | 0.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
T AT&T Inc. | 4.71% | 4.47% | 4.87% | 6.62% | 6.66% | 8.46% | 7.23% | 5.22% | 7.01% | 5.04% | 4.51% | 5.46% |
Financials
T vs. PWR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between AT&T Inc. and Quanta Services, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
T and PWR have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PWR has higher volatility (13.07%) compared to T (8.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, T dropped -64.15% vs PWR's -97.07%.
PWR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs -0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for T and PWR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer