WSM vs. PLTR
WSM (Williams-Sonoma, Inc.) and PLTR (Palantir Technologies Inc.) are both stocks. WSM operates in Specialty Retail (Consumer Cyclical), while PLTR operates in Software - Infrastructure (Technology). Over the past 5 years, WSM returned 23.70%/yr vs 39.00%/yr for PLTR. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
WSM vs. PLTR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WSM achieves a 26.06% return, which is significantly higher than PLTR's -27.99% return.
WSM
- 1D
- 2.19%
- 1M
- 32.55%
- YTD
- 26.06%
- 6M
- 20.02%
- 1Y
- 47.32%
- 3Y*
- 53.75%
- 5Y*
- 23.70%
- 10Y*
- 27.10%
PLTR
- 1D
- -2.36%
- 1M
- -4.48%
- YTD
- -27.99%
- 6M
- -30.28%
- 1Y
- -6.85%
- 3Y*
- 99.99%
- 5Y*
- 39.00%
- 10Y*
- —
WSM vs. PLTR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WSM Williams-Sonoma, Inc. | 26.06% | -2.09% | 86.56% | 80.24% | -30.49% | 68.60% | 14.72% |
PLTR Palantir Technologies Inc. | -27.99% | 135.03% | 340.48% | 167.45% | -64.74% | -22.68% | 135.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between WSM and PLTR is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2020 | 0.33 |
Over the past year, the correlation between WSM and PLTR has dropped to 0.09 - well below their long-term average of 0.33, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
WSM:
$26.80B
PLTR:
$329.05B
WSM:
$8.93
PLTR:
$0.89
WSM:
25.04
PLTR:
144.03
WSM:
5.06
PLTR:
0.84
WSM:
3.46
PLTR:
62.90
WSM:
14.33
PLTR:
38.94
WSM:
$7.88B
PLTR:
$5.22B
WSM:
$3.63B
PLTR:
$4.39B
WSM:
$1.49B
PLTR:
$2.01B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WSM vs. PLTR — Risk / Return Rank
WSM
PLTR
WSM vs. PLTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Williams-Sonoma, Inc. (WSM) and Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WSM | PLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.86 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.03 | +0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.01 | -0.14 | +2.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.55 | -0.25 | +4.80 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WSM vs. PLTR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WSM drawdown since its inception was -89.01%, which is greater than PLTR's maximum drawdown of -84.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WSM and PLTR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WSM | PLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -89.01% | -84.62% | -4.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.27% | -38.22% | +14.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.79% | -40.61% | +3.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -51.92% | -79.14% | +27.22% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -59.71% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -38.22% | +38.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.03% | -40.27% | +15.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.25% | 21.23% | -10.98% |
Volatility
WSM vs. PLTR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Williams-Sonoma, Inc. (WSM) is 12.02%, while Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR) has a volatility of 17.16%. This indicates that WSM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PLTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WSM | PLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.02% | 17.16% | -5.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.57% | 38.32% | -12.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.63% | 50.83% | -16.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.77% | 65.44% | -20.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 44.26% | 69.75% | -25.49% |
Dividends
WSM vs. PLTR - Dividend Comparison
WSM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.23%, while PLTR has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PLTR Palantir Technologies Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WSM Williams-Sonoma, Inc. | 1.23% | 1.43% | 1.16% | 1.72% | 2.65% | 1.43% | 1.93% | 2.55% | 3.33% | 2.98% | 3.02% | 2.36% |
Financials
WSM vs. PLTR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Williams-Sonoma, Inc. and Palantir Technologies Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
WSM vs. PLTR - Profitability Comparison
WSM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Williams-Sonoma, Inc. reported a gross profit of 793.43M and revenue of 1.81B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 44.0%.
PLTR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Palantir Technologies Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.42B and revenue of 1.63B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 86.8%.
WSM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Williams-Sonoma, Inc. reported an operating income of 291.69M and revenue of 1.81B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.2%.
PLTR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Palantir Technologies Inc. reported an operating income of 754.00M and revenue of 1.63B, resulting in an operating margin of 46.2%.
WSM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Williams-Sonoma, Inc. reported a net income of 231.36M and revenue of 1.81B, resulting in a net margin of 12.8%.
PLTR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Palantir Technologies Inc. reported a net income of 870.53M and revenue of 1.63B, resulting in a net margin of 53.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
WSM and PLTR have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PLTR has higher volatility (17.16%) compared to WSM (12.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WSM dropped -89.01% vs PLTR's -84.62%.
WSM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.35 vs -0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WSM and PLTR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer