RL vs. WSM
Compare and contrast key facts about Ralph Lauren Corporation (RL) and Williams-Sonoma, Inc. (WSM).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: RL or WSM.
Correlation
The correlation between RL and WSM is 0.42, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
RL vs. WSM - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
RL:
1.68
WSM:
1.34
RL:
2.45
WSM:
2.19
RL:
1.29
WSM:
1.29
RL:
2.99
WSM:
3.31
RL:
6.99
WSM:
7.21
RL:
7.29%
WSM:
9.60%
RL:
30.44%
WSM:
51.90%
RL:
-68.62%
WSM:
-89.01%
RL:
-5.44%
WSM:
-10.62%
Fundamentals
RL:
$16.72B
WSM:
$24.41B
RL:
$10.98
WSM:
$8.55
RL:
24.66
WSM:
23.20
RL:
2.12
WSM:
2.48
RL:
$6.95B
WSM:
$5.25B
RL:
$4.73B
WSM:
$2.47B
RL:
$1.15B
WSM:
$1.05B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RL achieves a 17.39% return, which is significantly higher than WSM's 5.38% return. Over the past 10 years, RL has underperformed WSM with an annualized return of 9.47%, while WSM has yielded a comparatively higher 20.19% annualized return.
RL
17.39%
4.89%
59.55%
49.02%
22.77%
9.47%
WSM
5.38%
-10.55%
45.85%
66.89%
46.37%
20.19%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
RL vs. WSM — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
RL
WSM
RL vs. WSM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ralph Lauren Corporation (RL) and Williams-Sonoma, Inc. (WSM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
RL vs. WSM - Dividend Comparison
RL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.19%, more than WSM's 1.17% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RL Ralph Lauren Corporation | 1.19% | 1.40% | 2.08% | 2.78% | 1.74% | 0.66% | 2.29% | 2.30% | 1.93% | 2.21% | 1.79% | 0.97% |
WSM Williams-Sonoma, Inc. | 1.17% | 1.16% | 1.72% | 2.65% | 1.43% | 1.93% | 2.55% | 3.33% | 2.98% | 3.02% | 2.36% | 1.72% |
Drawdowns
RL vs. WSM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RL drawdown since its inception was -68.62%, smaller than the maximum WSM drawdown of -89.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RL and WSM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
RL vs. WSM - Volatility Comparison
Ralph Lauren Corporation (RL) has a higher volatility of 12.19% compared to Williams-Sonoma, Inc. (WSM) at 10.88%. This indicates that RL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WSM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
RL vs. WSM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ralph Lauren Corporation and Williams-Sonoma, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities