PM vs. PWR
PM (Philip Morris International Inc.) and PWR (Quanta Services, Inc.) are both stocks. PM operates in Tobacco (Consumer Defensive), while PWR operates in Engineering & Construction (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, PM returned 11.05%/yr vs 40.58%/yr for PWR. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PM vs. PWR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PM achieves a 10.74% return, which is significantly lower than PWR's 64.46% return. Over the past 10 years, PM has underperformed PWR with an annualized return of 11.05%, while PWR has yielded a comparatively higher 40.58% annualized return.
PM
- 1D
- -1.25%
- 1M
- 2.97%
- YTD
- 10.74%
- 6M
- 20.88%
- 1Y
- 0.31%
- 3Y*
- 29.53%
- 5Y*
- 18.20%
- 10Y*
- 11.05%
PWR
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- -6.87%
- YTD
- 64.46%
- 6M
- 49.89%
- 1Y
- 92.19%
- 3Y*
- 56.18%
- 5Y*
- 49.77%
- 10Y*
- 40.58%
PM vs. PWR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PM Philip Morris International Inc. | 10.74% | 37.99% | 34.34% | -1.85% | 12.31% | 20.78% | 3.69% | 35.02% | -33.30% | 19.85% |
PWR Quanta Services, Inc. | 64.46% | 33.70% | 46.60% | 51.70% | 24.63% | 59.50% | 77.74% | 35.84% | -22.93% | 12.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between PM and PWR is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 18, 2008 | 0.26 |
Over the past year, the correlation between PM and PWR has dropped to 0.01 - well below their long-term average of 0.26, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
PM:
$275.15B
PWR:
$105.52B
PM:
$7.12
PWR:
$7.29
PM:
24.74
PWR:
95.17
PM:
2.69
PWR:
4.72
PM:
6.62
PWR:
3.51
PM:
$41.49B
PWR:
$29.99B
PM:
$27.93B
PWR:
$4.08B
PM:
$17.74B
PWR:
$2.40B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PM vs. PWR — Risk / Return Rank
PM
PWR
PM vs. PWR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Philip Morris International Inc. (PM) and Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PM | PWR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.54 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 1.43 | -0.41 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.02 | 7.45 | -7.43 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.03 | 17.97 | -17.94 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PM | PWR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.01 | 2.55 | -2.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 | 1.41 | -0.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.45 | 1.21 | -0.76 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.52 | 0.35 | +0.17 |
Drawdowns
PM vs. PWR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PM drawdown since its inception was -42.87%, smaller than the maximum PWR drawdown of -97.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PM and PWR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PM | PWR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.87% | -97.07% | +54.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.64% | -12.45% | -8.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.64% | -33.89% | +13.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.78% | -33.89% | +11.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.87% | -45.53% | +2.66% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.24% | -11.64% | +3.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.02% | -46.86% | +36.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.79% | 5.15% | +5.64% |
Volatility
PM vs. PWR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Philip Morris International Inc. (PM) is 9.76%, while Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR) has a volatility of 11.16%. This indicates that PM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PWR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PM | PWR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.76% | 11.16% | -1.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.84% | 29.60% | -8.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.67% | 36.37% | -8.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.69% | 35.62% | -12.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.45% | 33.70% | -9.25% |
Dividends
PM vs. PWR - Dividend Comparison
PM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.27%, more than PWR's 0.06% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PM Philip Morris International Inc. | 3.27% | 3.52% | 4.40% | 5.46% | 4.98% | 5.16% | 5.73% | 5.43% | 6.73% | 3.99% | 4.50% | 4.60% |
PWR Quanta Services, Inc. | 0.06% | 0.09% | 0.09% | 0.15% | 0.25% | 0.16% | 0.29% | 0.42% | 0.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
PM vs. PWR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Philip Morris International Inc. and Quanta Services, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
PM vs. PWR - Profitability Comparison
PM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Philip Morris International Inc. reported a gross profit of 6.91B and revenue of 10.15B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 68.1%.
PWR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Quanta Services, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.11B and revenue of 7.87B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 14.1%.
PM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Philip Morris International Inc. reported an operating income of 3.89B and revenue of 10.15B, resulting in an operating margin of 38.4%.
PWR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Quanta Services, Inc. reported an operating income of 338.78M and revenue of 7.87B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.3%.
PM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Philip Morris International Inc. reported a net income of 2.44B and revenue of 10.15B, resulting in a net margin of 24.0%.
PWR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Quanta Services, Inc. reported a net income of 220.63M and revenue of 7.87B, resulting in a net margin of 2.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
PM and PWR have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PWR has higher volatility (11.16%) compared to PM (9.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PM dropped -42.87% vs PWR's -97.07%.
PWR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.55 vs 0.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PM and PWR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer