PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WRB vs. AXON
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

WRB vs. AXON - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in W. R. Berkley Corporation (WRB) and Axon Enterprise, Inc. (AXON). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WRB achieves a -2.51% return, which is significantly higher than AXON's -22.22% return. Over the past 10 years, WRB has underperformed AXON with an annualized return of 17.92%, while AXON has yielded a comparatively higher 34.58% annualized return.


WRB

1D
1.08%
1M
2.74%
YTD
-2.51%
6M
0.17%
1Y
-4.36%
3Y*
24.41%
5Y*
17.90%
10Y*
17.92%

AXON

1D
-1.00%
1M
12.72%
YTD
-22.22%
6M
-21.72%
1Y
-43.41%
3Y*
30.96%
5Y*
22.92%
10Y*
34.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WRB vs. AXON - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WRB
W. R. Berkley Corporation
-2.51%23.02%27.19%0.25%33.92%27.39%-3.14%43.80%5.96%10.21%
AXON
Axon Enterprise, Inc.
-22.22%-4.44%130.06%55.69%5.69%28.13%67.21%67.50%65.09%9.32%

Correlation

The correlation between WRB and AXON is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.08

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 7, 2001

0.22

The correlation between WRB and AXON shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (1 year) to 0.22 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

WRB:

$4.45

AXON:

$2.41

PE Ratio

WRB:

15.34

AXON:

183.64

PEG Ratio

WRB:

0.89

AXON:

0.05

PS Ratio

WRB:

1.86

AXON:

12.70

Total Revenue (TTM)

WRB:

$14.71B

AXON:

$2.98B

Gross Profit (TTM)

WRB:

$2.91B

AXON:

$1.77B

EBITDA (TTM)

WRB:

$2.37B

AXON:

$156.24M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WRB vs. AXON — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WRB
WRB Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
WRB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WRB Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
WRB Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
WRB Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
WRB Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

AXON
AXON Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
AXON Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AXON Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
AXON Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
AXON Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
AXON Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WRB vs. AXON - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for W. R. Berkley Corporation (WRB) and Axon Enterprise, Inc. (AXON). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WRBAXONDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.86

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.98

0.87

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.29

-0.72

+0.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.54

-1.22

+0.68

WRB vs. AXON - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WRB Sharpe Ratio is -0.24, which is higher than the AXON Sharpe Ratio of -0.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WRB and AXON, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WRB vs. AXON - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WRB drawdown since its inception was -69.33%, smaller than the maximum AXON drawdown of -91.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WRB and AXON.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WRBAXONDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.33%

-91.78%

+22.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.62%

-60.28%

+42.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.62%

-60.28%

+42.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.29%

-60.28%

+33.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.35%

-60.28%

+14.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.49%

-49.28%

+37.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.58%

-43.60%

+29.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.29%

35.34%

-26.05%

Volatility

WRB vs. AXON - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for W. R. Berkley Corporation (WRB) is 7.63%, while Axon Enterprise, Inc. (AXON) has a volatility of 17.73%. This indicates that WRB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AXON based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WRBAXONDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.63%

17.73%

-10.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.08%

44.20%

-29.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.37%

55.66%

-34.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.83%

47.94%

-25.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.56%

49.18%

-24.62%

Dividends

WRB vs. AXON - Dividend Comparison

WRB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.72%, while AXON has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AXON
Axon Enterprise, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
WRB
W. R. Berkley Corporation
2.72%2.64%2.39%2.73%1.22%2.44%0.71%2.43%2.83%2.16%2.27%0.86%

Financials

WRB vs. AXON - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between W. R. Berkley Corporation and Axon Enterprise, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B20222023202420252026
3.72B
807.35M
(WRB) Total Revenue
(AXON) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

WRB vs. AXON - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between W. R. Berkley Corporation and Axon Enterprise, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%20222023202420252026
20.6%
59.1%
Portfolio components
WRB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, W. R. Berkley Corporation reported a gross profit of 765.46M and revenue of 3.72B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 20.6%.

AXON - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Axon Enterprise, Inc. reported a gross profit of 477.29M and revenue of 807.35M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 59.1%.

WRB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, W. R. Berkley Corporation reported an operating income of 606.51M and revenue of 3.72B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.3%.

AXON - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Axon Enterprise, Inc. reported an operating income of 29.24M and revenue of 807.35M, resulting in an operating margin of 3.6%.

WRB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, W. R. Berkley Corporation reported a net income of 449.51M and revenue of 3.72B, resulting in a net margin of 12.1%.

AXON - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Axon Enterprise, Inc. reported a net income of 169.31M and revenue of 807.35M, resulting in a net margin of 21.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


WRB and AXON have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AXON has higher volatility (17.73%) compared to WRB (7.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WRB dropped -69.33% vs AXON's -91.78%.

WRB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.24 vs -0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WRB and AXON

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer