PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WRB vs. COR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

WRB vs. COR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in W. R. Berkley Corporation (WRB) and Cencora Inc. (COR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WRB achieves a -2.51% return, which is significantly higher than COR's -16.27% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with WRB having a 17.92% annualized return and COR not far behind at 17.47%.


WRB

1D
1.08%
1M
2.74%
YTD
-2.51%
6M
0.17%
1Y
-4.36%
3Y*
24.41%
5Y*
17.90%
10Y*
17.92%

COR

1D
0.07%
1M
9.30%
YTD
-16.27%
6M
-18.27%
1Y
-3.97%
3Y*
17.14%
5Y*
20.65%
10Y*
17.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WRB vs. COR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WRB
W. R. Berkley Corporation
-2.51%23.02%27.19%0.25%33.92%27.39%-3.14%43.80%5.96%10.21%
COR
Cencora Inc.
-16.27%51.48%10.37%25.33%26.26%44.09%23.37%23.51%-17.57%19.51%

Correlation

The correlation between WRB and COR is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 1995

0.25

The correlation between WRB and COR shifts across timeframes, from 0.25 (all time) to 0.37 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

WRB:

$4.45

COR:

$13.07

PE Ratio

WRB:

15.34

COR:

21.55

PEG Ratio

WRB:

0.89

COR:

10.24

PS Ratio

WRB:

1.86

COR:

0.17

Total Revenue (TTM)

WRB:

$14.71B

COR:

$328.68B

Gross Profit (TTM)

WRB:

$2.91B

COR:

$11.66B

EBITDA (TTM)

WRB:

$2.37B

COR:

$3.64B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WRB vs. COR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WRB
WRB Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
WRB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WRB Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
WRB Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
WRB Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
WRB Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

COR
COR Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
COR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COR Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
COR Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
COR Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
COR Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WRB vs. COR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for W. R. Berkley Corporation (WRB) and Cencora Inc. (COR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WRBCORDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.98

1.01

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.29

-0.12

-0.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.54

-0.33

-0.21

WRB vs. COR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WRB Sharpe Ratio is -0.24, which is lower than the COR Sharpe Ratio of -0.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WRB and COR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WRB vs. COR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WRB drawdown since its inception was -69.33%, roughly equal to the maximum COR drawdown of -71.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WRB and COR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WRBCORDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.33%

-71.01%

+1.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.62%

-32.44%

+14.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.62%

-32.44%

+14.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.29%

-32.44%

+6.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.35%

-32.44%

-12.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.49%

-24.54%

+13.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.58%

-13.62%

-0.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.29%

11.68%

-2.39%

Volatility

WRB vs. COR - Volatility Comparison

W. R. Berkley Corporation (WRB) has a higher volatility of 7.63% compared to Cencora Inc. (COR) at 6.51%. This indicates that WRB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WRBCORDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.63%

6.51%

+1.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.08%

26.93%

-11.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.37%

30.20%

-8.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.83%

22.30%

+0.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.56%

27.48%

-2.92%

Dividends

WRB vs. COR - Dividend Comparison

WRB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.72%, more than COR's 0.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
COR
Cencora Inc.
0.83%0.67%0.93%0.96%1.13%5.13%6.74%7.48%2.07%1.61%1.77%1.17%
WRB
W. R. Berkley Corporation
2.72%2.64%2.39%2.73%1.22%2.44%0.71%2.43%2.83%2.16%2.27%0.86%

Financials

WRB vs. COR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between W. R. Berkley Corporation and Cencora Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B20222023202420252026
3.72B
78.36B
(WRB) Total Revenue
(COR) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

WRB vs. COR - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between W. R. Berkley Corporation and Cencora Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

5.0%10.0%15.0%20.0%25.0%30.0%20222023202420252026
20.6%
4.6%
Portfolio components
WRB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, W. R. Berkley Corporation reported a gross profit of 765.46M and revenue of 3.72B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 20.6%.

COR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cencora Inc. reported a gross profit of 3.59B and revenue of 78.36B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 4.6%.

WRB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, W. R. Berkley Corporation reported an operating income of 606.51M and revenue of 3.72B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.3%.

COR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cencora Inc. reported an operating income of 1.14B and revenue of 78.36B, resulting in an operating margin of 1.5%.

WRB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, W. R. Berkley Corporation reported a net income of 449.51M and revenue of 3.72B, resulting in a net margin of 12.1%.

COR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cencora Inc. reported a net income of 1.64B and revenue of 78.36B, resulting in a net margin of 2.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


WRB and COR have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WRB has higher volatility (7.63%) compared to COR (6.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WRB dropped -69.33% vs COR's -71.01%.

COR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.13 vs -0.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WRB and COR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer