PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
GFGF vs. VTI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

GFGF vs. VTI

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

GFGF (Guru Favorite Stocks ETF) and VTI (Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. GFGF is actively managed, while VTI is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, GFGF returned 17.85%/yr vs 22.37%/yr for VTI. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GFGF charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VTI.

Performance

GFGF vs. VTI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Guru Favorite Stocks ETF (GFGF) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GFGF achieves a 1.26% return, which is significantly lower than VTI's 11.72% return.

GFGF

1D
1.70%
1M
3.38%
YTD
1.26%
6M
2.82%
1Y
12.07%
3Y*
17.85%
5Y*
—
10Y*
—

VTI

1D
0.47%
1M
4.59%
YTD
11.72%
6M
11.43%
1Y
28.79%
3Y*
22.37%
5Y*
12.80%
10Y*
15.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GFGF vs. VTI - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
GFGF
Guru Favorite Stocks ETF		1.26%13.11%26.12%24.03%-20.32%2.13%
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF		11.72%17.10%23.81%26.05%-19.52%2.45%

Correlation

The correlation between GFGF and VTI is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2021

0.87

The correlation between GFGF and VTI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

GFGF vs. VTI - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
GFGF
VTI

Technology

32.7%
33.5%

Financial Services

31.2%
12.0%

Healthcare

13.6%
9.2%

Communication Services

11.2%
10.3%

Consumer Cyclical

6.8%
10.0%

Consumer Defensive

3.1%
4.7%

Industrials

2.5%
9.8%

Real Estate

2.0%
2.4%

Basic Materials

-

2.0%

Energy

-

3.7%

Utilities

-

2.3%

Technology

GFGF
32.7%
VTI
33.5%

Financial Services

GFGF
31.2%
VTI
12.0%

Healthcare

GFGF
13.6%
VTI
9.2%

Communication Services

GFGF
11.2%
VTI
10.3%

Consumer Cyclical

GFGF
6.8%
VTI
10.0%

Consumer Defensive

GFGF
3.1%
VTI
4.7%

Industrials

GFGF
2.5%
VTI
9.8%

Real Estate

GFGF
2.0%
VTI
2.4%

Basic Materials

GFGF

-

VTI
2.0%

Energy

GFGF

-

VTI
3.7%

Utilities

GFGF

-

VTI
2.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Guru Favorite Stocks ETF

Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF

Often compared with GFGF:
GFGF vs. XNTKGFGF vs. SPYGFGF vs. IWYGFGF vs. VGTGFGF vs. SCHGGFGF vs. VOOGFGF vs. guru
Often compared with VTI:
VTI vs. VOOVTI vs. VXUSVTI vs. SPYVTI vs. VTVTI vs. SCHDVTI vs. FZROXVTI vs. QQQ

Return for Risk

GFGF vs. VTI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
GFGF
GFGF Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
GFGF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GFGF Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
GFGF Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
GFGF Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
GFGF Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
VTI
VTI Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
VTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTI Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
VTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTI Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GFGF vs. VTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Guru Favorite Stocks ETF (GFGF) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

GFGFVTIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.96
2.38

-1.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.39
3.24

-1.85

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.43

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.80

3.24

-2.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.73

14.94

-12.21

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GFGF vs. VTI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GFGF Sharpe Ratio is 0.96, which is lower than the VTI Sharpe Ratio of 2.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GFGF and VTI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

GFGFVTIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

2.38

-1.41

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

—

0.74

—

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

—

0.82

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.51

-0.04

Drawdowns

GFGF vs. VTI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GFGF drawdown since its inception was -27.98%, smaller than the maximum VTI drawdown of -55.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GFGF and VTI.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

GFGFVTIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.98%

-55.45%

+27.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.22%

-8.92%

-6.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.60%

-19.30%

+3.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

—

-25.36%

—

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-35.00%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.74%

-0.26%

-0.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.26%

-8.03%

-0.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.43%

1.93%

+2.50%

Volatility

GFGF vs. VTI - Volatility Comparison

Guru Favorite Stocks ETF (GFGF) has a higher volatility of 3.05% compared to Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) at 2.90%. This indicates that GFGF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

GFGFVTIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.05%

2.90%

+0.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.56%

9.13%

+0.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.59%

12.17%

+0.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.09%

17.40%

+1.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.09%

18.30%

+0.79%

GFGF vs. VTI - Expense Ratio Comparison

GFGF has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than VTI's 0.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

GFGF vs. VTI - Dividend Comparison

GFGF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.21%, less than VTI's 1.01% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GFGF
Guru Favorite Stocks ETF		0.21%0.21%0.10%0.08%0.42%0.01%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF		1.01%1.12%1.27%1.44%1.66%1.21%1.42%1.78%2.04%1.71%1.92%1.98%

Frequently Asked Questions

GFGF and VTI have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GFGF has higher volatility (3.05%) compared to VTI (2.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GFGF dropped -27.98% vs VTI's -55.45%.

On 3-year performance, VTI leads with 22.37% vs 17.85% for GFGF. On fees, VTI is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VTI has been the lower-risk option at 2.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, VTI has performed better with a 22.37% return vs 17.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VTI is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for GFGF.

VTI has the higher dividend yield at 1.01%, compared with 0.21% for GFGF.

They also come from different issuers: GuruFocus and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for GFGF and 0.03% for VTI.

VTI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GFGF and VTI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer