PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BTMKX vs. VEA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BTMKX vs. VEA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI EAFE International Index Fund (BTMKX) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BTMKX achieves a 9.65% return, which is significantly lower than VEA's 14.92% return. Over the past 10 years, BTMKX has underperformed VEA with an annualized return of 9.42%, while VEA has yielded a comparatively higher 10.17% annualized return.


BTMKX

1D
0.33%
1M
4.17%
YTD
9.65%
6M
12.05%
1Y
22.44%
3Y*
17.20%
5Y*
8.94%
10Y*
9.42%

VEA

1D
-0.90%
1M
5.54%
YTD
14.92%
6M
18.15%
1Y
32.48%
3Y*
19.77%
5Y*
9.60%
10Y*
10.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BTMKX vs. VEA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BTMKX
iShares MSCI EAFE International Index Fund
9.65%31.70%3.70%18.37%-14.04%11.30%8.07%21.96%-13.38%25.17%
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
14.92%35.16%3.15%17.93%-15.34%11.66%9.71%22.62%-14.75%26.42%

Correlation

The correlation between BTMKX and VEA is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2011

0.98

The correlation between BTMKX and VEA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BTMKX vs. VEA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BTMKX
BTMKX Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
BTMKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BTMKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
BTMKX Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
BTMKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
BTMKX Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

VEA
VEA Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
VEA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEA Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
VEA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEA Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BTMKX vs. VEA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EAFE International Index Fund (BTMKX) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BTMKXVEADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.81

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.38

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.91

2.81

-0.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.15

10.94

-3.79

BTMKX vs. VEA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BTMKX Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is lower than the VEA Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BTMKX and VEA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BTMKXVEADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.43

2.09

-0.66

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

0.58

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

0.59

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.25

+0.15

Drawdowns

BTMKX vs. VEA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BTMKX drawdown since its inception was -33.92%, smaller than the maximum VEA drawdown of -60.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTMKX and VEA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BTMKXVEADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.92%

-60.68%

+26.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.30%

-11.63%

+0.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.66%

-13.45%

-0.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.23%

-29.71%

+0.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.92%

-35.73%

+1.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.38%

-0.90%

+0.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.77%

-13.29%

+5.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.01%

2.98%

+0.03%

Volatility

BTMKX vs. VEA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI EAFE International Index Fund (BTMKX) is 4.70%, while Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) has a volatility of 5.66%. This indicates that BTMKX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VEA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BTMKXVEADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.70%

5.66%

-0.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.29%

13.32%

-1.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.14%

15.66%

-0.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.17%

16.55%

-0.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.67%

17.36%

-0.69%

BTMKX vs. VEA - Expense Ratio Comparison

BTMKX has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is higher than VEA's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BTMKX vs. VEA - Dividend Comparison

BTMKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.42%, more than VEA's 2.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BTMKX
iShares MSCI EAFE International Index Fund
3.42%3.74%3.43%3.19%2.80%3.06%1.99%3.34%4.58%2.45%2.85%2.42%
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
2.62%3.22%3.35%3.15%2.91%3.16%2.04%3.04%3.35%2.77%3.05%2.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, BTMKX and VEA move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VEA has higher volatility (5.66%) compared to BTMKX (4.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BTMKX dropped -33.92% vs VEA's -60.68%.

VEA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BTMKX and VEA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer