The perf number is wrong - FGLGX is better than QQQ?
5 ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠ΅Π²
3 ΠΎΡΠ²Π΅ΡΠ°
Π‘ΠΎΡΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°ΡΡ ΠΏΠΎ
A lot depends on how you define βbetterβ.
That said, if thereβs anything that seems immediately off, let us know
-9 ΠΌΠ΅Ρ.
I just did a quick cross-check with data on Yahoo Finance. The adjusted closing price on Aug 25, 2020, was 10.14, and the most recent adjusted close is 25.65, so roughly a 153% increase over the 5-year period. That matches the values we are showing pretty close.
How did you get 72%?
I was checking it with Google Finance. It somehow has a different price and performance.
I checked Fidelity website. Their performance number aligns with yours. So Google Finance seem to be incorrect.
-9 ΠΌΠ΅Ρ.
Yeah, that makes sense, Google Finance is unfortunately not a reliable source. Their data is often missing distributions and split adjustments, or pulled from inconsistent feeds. So their performance numbers can look completely off.
Fidelityβs site and Yahoo Finance both use properly adjusted prices, which is why they line up with what we show. In general, GF is fine for a quick glance, but for anything performance-related itβs mostly garbage.
-9 ΠΌΠ΅Ρ.