PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EET vs. NOBL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EET vs. NOBL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets (EET) and ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EET achieves a 41.10% return, which is significantly higher than NOBL's 6.93% return. Over the past 10 years, EET has outperformed NOBL with an annualized return of 10.67%, while NOBL has yielded a comparatively lower 10.02% annualized return.


EET

1D
-0.60%
1M
2.69%
YTD
41.10%
6M
42.83%
1Y
81.79%
3Y*
34.98%
5Y*
2.48%
10Y*
10.67%

NOBL

1D
0.42%
1M
2.70%
YTD
6.93%
6M
5.89%
1Y
12.41%
3Y*
8.66%
5Y*
6.13%
10Y*
10.02%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EET vs. NOBL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EET
ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets
41.10%63.14%2.88%7.06%-43.07%-10.93%18.92%31.87%-33.84%82.41%
NOBL
ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF
6.93%6.84%6.72%8.09%-6.52%25.46%8.35%27.39%-3.26%21.02%

Correlation

The correlation between EET and NOBL is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.37

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2013

0.53

Over the past year, the correlation between EET and NOBL has dropped to 0.25 - well below their long-term average of 0.53, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

EET vs. NOBL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EET
NOBL

Financial Services

41.4%
12.8%

Basic Materials

-

10.2%

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

5.3%

Consumer Defensive

-

23.6%

Energy

-

2.9%

Healthcare

-

10.2%

Industrials

-

20.2%

Real Estate

-

4.6%

Technology

-

4.6%

Utilities

-

5.7%

Financial Services

EET
41.4%
NOBL
12.8%

Basic Materials

EET

-

NOBL
10.2%

Communication Services

EET

-

NOBL

-

Consumer Cyclical

EET

-

NOBL
5.3%

Consumer Defensive

EET

-

NOBL
23.6%

Energy

EET

-

NOBL
2.9%

Healthcare

EET

-

NOBL
10.2%

Industrials

EET

-

NOBL
20.2%

Real Estate

EET

-

NOBL
4.6%

Technology

EET

-

NOBL
4.6%

Utilities

EET

-

NOBL
5.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EET vs. NOBL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EET
EET Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
EET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EET Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
EET Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
EET Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
EET Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

NOBL
NOBL Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
NOBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NOBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
NOBL Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
NOBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
NOBL Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EET vs. NOBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets (EET) and ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EETNOBLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.19

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.12

1.37

+1.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.84

3.47

+7.38

EET vs. NOBL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EET Sharpe Ratio is 1.83, which is higher than the NOBL Sharpe Ratio of 1.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EET and NOBL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EET vs. NOBL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EET drawdown since its inception was -71.66%, which is greater than NOBL's maximum drawdown of -35.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EET and NOBL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EETNOBLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.66%

-35.43%

-36.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.38%

-9.11%

-17.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.89%

-15.36%

-19.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-64.51%

-17.92%

-46.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-69.07%

-35.43%

-33.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.38%

-2.89%

-8.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-37.16%

-3.48%

-33.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.57%

3.59%

+3.98%

Volatility

EET vs. NOBL - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets (EET) has a higher volatility of 25.42% compared to ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) at 3.31%. This indicates that EET's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NOBL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EETNOBLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

25.42%

3.31%

+22.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

41.30%

8.22%

+33.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

45.20%

11.47%

+33.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

39.04%

14.38%

+24.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.96%

16.60%

+24.36%

EET vs. NOBL - Expense Ratio Comparison

EET has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than NOBL's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

EET vs. NOBL - Dividend Comparison

EET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.34%, less than NOBL's 2.05% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EET
ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets
1.34%1.82%3.85%2.14%0.00%0.00%0.01%1.40%0.16%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NOBL
ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF
2.05%2.14%2.05%2.09%1.94%1.89%2.14%1.89%2.37%1.74%2.13%2.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


EET and NOBL have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EET has higher volatility (25.42%) compared to NOBL (3.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EET dropped -71.66% vs NOBL's -35.43%.

On 10-year performance, EET leads with 10.67% vs 10.02% for NOBL. On fees, NOBL is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, NOBL has been the lower-risk option at 3.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, EET has performed better with a 10.67% return vs 10.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NOBL is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for EET.

NOBL has the higher dividend yield at 2.05%, compared with 1.34% for EET.

EET is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while NOBL is Dividend. EET tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Index (200%), while NOBL tracks S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for EET and 0.35% for NOBL.

EET currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EET and NOBL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer