EET vs. EEMA

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

EET (ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets) and EEMA (iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Asia ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EET is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Index (200%), while EEMA is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Asia Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EET returned 11.03%/yr vs 10.80%/yr for EEMA. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EET charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for EEMA.

Performance

EET vs. EEMA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets (EET) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Asia ETF (EEMA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EET achieves a 54.14% return, which is significantly higher than EEMA's 27.78% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with EET having a 11.03% annualized return and EEMA not far behind at 10.80%.

EET

• 1D: -2.52%
• 1M: 17.51%
• YTD: 54.14%
• 6M: 60.18%
• 1Y: 118.88%
• 3Y*: 38.53%
• 5Y*: 4.07%
• 10Y*: 11.03%

EEMA

• 1D: -1.17%
• 1M: 9.00%
• YTD: 27.78%
• 6M: 30.96%
• 1Y: 56.77%
• 3Y*: 24.08%
• 5Y*: 7.05%
• 10Y*: 10.80%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EET vs. EEMA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EET ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets	54.14%	63.14%	2.88%	7.06%	-43.07%	-10.93%	18.92%	31.87%	-33.84%	82.41%
EEMA iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Asia ETF	27.78%	33.27%	10.23%	6.57%	-21.49%	-4.22%	25.17%	18.60%	-15.76%	43.41%

Correlation

The correlation between EET and EEMA is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.97
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.96
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.96
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 10, 2012	0.91

The correlation between EET and EEMA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

EET vs. EEMA - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EET	EEMA
Financial Services	51.5%	15.9%
Basic Materials	-	4.5%
Communication Services	-	6.0%
Consumer Cyclical	-	11.3%
Consumer Defensive	-	2.8%
Energy	-	3.2%
Healthcare	-	3.7%
Industrials	-	8.8%
Real Estate	-	0.8%
Technology	-	41.2%
Utilities	-	1.8%

Return for Risk

EET vs. EEMA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EET

EET Risk / Return Rank: 81
EET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
EET Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
EET Omega Ratio Rank: 77
EET Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
EET Martin Ratio Rank: 82

EEMA

EEMA Risk / Return Rank: 81
EEMA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
EEMA Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
EEMA Omega Ratio Rank: 82
EEMA Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
EEMA Martin Ratio Rank: 77

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EET vs. EEMA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets (EET) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Asia ETF (EEMA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EET	EEMA	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	3.02	2.80	+0.22
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.33	3.64	-0.32
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.46	1.50	-0.04
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.53	3.99	+0.54
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	16.64	15.03	+1.60
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EET vs. EEMA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EET Sharpe Ratio is 3.02, which is comparable to the EEMA Sharpe Ratio of 2.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EET and EEMA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EET	EEMA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.02	2.80	+0.22
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.11	0.35	-0.24
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.27	0.52	-0.25
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.12	0.37	-0.25

Drawdowns

EET vs. EEMA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EET drawdown since its inception was -71.66%, which is greater than EEMA's maximum drawdown of -44.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EET and EEMA.

Drawdown Indicators

	EET	EEMA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-71.66%	-44.18%	-27.48%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-26.38%	-14.30%	-12.08%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-34.89%	-20.23%	-14.66%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-64.88%	-40.67%	-24.21%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-69.07%	-44.18%	-24.89%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.52%	-1.17%	-1.35%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-37.27%	-13.97%	-23.30%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.17%	3.79%	+3.38%

Volatility

EET vs. EEMA - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets (EET) has a higher volatility of 17.46% compared to iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Asia ETF (EEMA) at 8.53%. This indicates that EET's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EEMA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EET	EEMA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	17.46%	8.53%	+8.93%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	34.52%	17.40%	+17.12%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	39.66%	20.39%	+19.27%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	37.78%	20.41%	+17.37%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	40.60%	20.87%	+19.73%

EET vs. EEMA - Expense Ratio Comparison

EET has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than EEMA's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

EET vs. EEMA - Dividend Comparison

EET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.23%, more than EEMA's 1.16% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EEMA iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Asia ETF	1.16%	1.48%	1.74%	2.02%	1.78%	2.19%	1.15%	1.86%	2.17%	1.74%	1.74%	2.44%
EET ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets	1.23%	1.82%	3.85%	2.14%	0.00%	0.00%	0.01%	1.40%	0.16%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EET and EEMA in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.97, EET and EEMA move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, EET or EEMA?

EET has higher volatility (17.46%) compared to EEMA (8.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EET dropped -71.66% vs EEMA's -44.18%.

Which ETF is better, EET or EEMA?

On 10-year performance, EET leads with 11.03% vs 10.80% for EEMA. On fees, EEMA is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, EEMA has been the lower-risk option at 8.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EET or EEMA?

Over the 10-year period, EET has performed better with a 11.03% return vs 10.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EET or EEMA?

EEMA is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for EET.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EET or EEMA?

EET has the higher dividend yield at 1.23%, compared with 1.16% for EEMA.

What is the main difference between EET and EEMA?

EET is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while EEMA is Asia Pacific Equities. EET tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Index (200%), while EEMA tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Asia Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for EET and 0.50% for EEMA.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EET currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.02 vs 2.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.