PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NOBL vs. SPY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NOBL vs. SPY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NOBL achieves a 11.60% return, which is significantly higher than SPY's 8.96% return. Over the past 10 years, NOBL has underperformed SPY with an annualized return of 9.85%, while SPY has yielded a comparatively higher 14.86% annualized return.


NOBL

1D
0.98%
1M
2.10%
6M
6.02%
YTD
11.60%
1Y
12.24%
3Y*
8.21%
5Y*
6.79%
10Y*
9.85%
ALL TIME*
10.77%

SPY

1D
0.02%
1M
1.39%
6M
7.26%
YTD
8.96%
1Y
17.29%
3Y*
18.85%
5Y*
12.50%
10Y*
14.86%
ALL TIME*
10.76%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$66.18M$67.22M$58.93M
$33.26B$34.73B$38.70B

NOBL vs. SPY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NOBL
ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF
11.60%6.84%6.72%8.09%-6.52%25.46%8.35%27.39%-3.26%21.02%
SPY
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF
8.96%17.72%24.89%26.18%-18.18%28.73%18.33%31.22%-4.57%21.71%

Correlation

The correlation between NOBL and SPY is 0.30, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.68

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2013

0.79

Over the past year, the correlation between NOBL and SPY has dropped to 0.30 - well below their long-term average of 0.79, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

NOBL vs. SPY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
NOBL
SPY

Consumer Defensive

23.5%
4.5%

Industrials

20.1%
8.3%

Financial Services

13.3%
12.1%

Healthcare

10.9%
9.1%

Basic Materials

9.4%
1.7%

Utilities

5.7%
2.3%

Consumer Cyclical

5.3%
8.8%

Real Estate

4.6%
1.9%

Technology

4.3%
38.4%

Energy

2.8%
3.4%

Communication Services

-

9.2%

Consumer Defensive

NOBL
23.5%
SPY
4.5%

Industrials

NOBL
20.1%
SPY
8.3%

Financial Services

NOBL
13.3%
SPY
12.1%

Healthcare

NOBL
10.9%
SPY
9.1%

Basic Materials

NOBL
9.4%
SPY
1.7%

Utilities

NOBL
5.7%
SPY
2.3%

Consumer Cyclical

NOBL
5.3%
SPY
8.8%

Real Estate

NOBL
4.6%
SPY
1.9%

Technology

NOBL
4.3%
SPY
38.4%

Energy

NOBL
2.8%
SPY
3.4%

Communication Services

NOBL

-

SPY
9.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NOBL vs. SPY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NOBL
NOBL Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
NOBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NOBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
NOBL Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
NOBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
NOBL Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

SPY
SPY Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
SPY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPY Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPY Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
SPY Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPY Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NOBL vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NOBLSPYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.25

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.35

1.95

-0.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.42

8.40

-4.98

NOBL vs. SPY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NOBL Sharpe Ratio is 1.04, which is comparable to the SPY Sharpe Ratio of 1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NOBL and SPY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NOBL vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NOBL drawdown since its inception was -35.43%, smaller than the maximum SPY drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NOBL and SPY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NOBLSPYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.43%

-55.19%

+19.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.11%

-8.88%

-0.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.36%

-18.76%

+3.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.92%

-24.50%

+6.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.43%

-33.72%

-1.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.42%

-2.45%

+2.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.47%

-9.02%

+5.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.61%

2.06%

+1.55%

Volatility

NOBL vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison

ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) has a higher volatility of 4.53% compared to State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) at 3.28%. This indicates that NOBL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NOBLSPYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.53%

3.28%

+1.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.83%

9.88%

-1.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.80%

12.70%

-0.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.45%

17.15%

-2.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.62%

17.94%

-1.32%

NOBL vs. SPY - Expense Ratio Comparison

NOBL has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than SPY's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

NOBL vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison

NOBL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.03%, more than SPY's 1.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NOBL
ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF
2.03%2.14%2.05%2.09%1.94%1.89%2.14%1.89%2.37%1.74%2.13%2.02%
SPY
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF
1.02%1.07%1.21%1.40%1.65%1.20%1.52%1.75%2.04%1.80%2.03%2.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


NOBL and SPY have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NOBL has higher volatility (4.53%) compared to SPY (3.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NOBL dropped -35.43% vs SPY's -55.19%.

On 10-year performance, SPY leads with 14.86% vs 9.85% for NOBL. On fees, SPY is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, SPY has been the lower-risk option at 3.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPY has performed better with a 14.86% return vs 9.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPY is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for NOBL.

NOBL has the higher dividend yield at 2.03%, compared with 1.02% for SPY.

NOBL is categorized as Dividend, while SPY is S&P 500. NOBL tracks S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index, while SPY tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for NOBL and 0.09% for SPY.

SPY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.37 vs 1.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NOBL and SPY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer