NOBL vs. SPY
NOBL (ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF) and SPY (State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NOBL is a Dividend fund tracking the S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index, while SPY is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, NOBL returned 9.76%/yr vs 15.43%/yr for SPY. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. NOBL charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for SPY.
Performance
NOBL vs. SPY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NOBL achieves a 5.96% return, which is significantly lower than SPY's 8.95% return. Over the past 10 years, NOBL has underperformed SPY with an annualized return of 9.76%, while SPY has yielded a comparatively higher 15.43% annualized return.
NOBL
- 1D
- -1.70%
- 1M
- 2.78%
- YTD
- 5.96%
- 6M
- 5.27%
- 1Y
- 13.12%
- 3Y*
- 7.61%
- 5Y*
- 6.56%
- 10Y*
- 9.76%
SPY
- 1D
- -1.25%
- 1M
- 0.31%
- YTD
- 8.95%
- 6M
- 10.99%
- 1Y
- 25.43%
- 3Y*
- 20.41%
- 5Y*
- 13.77%
- 10Y*
- 15.43%
NOBL vs. SPY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NOBL ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 5.96% | 6.84% | 6.72% | 8.09% | -6.52% | 25.46% | 8.35% | 27.39% | -3.26% | 21.02% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 8.95% | 17.72% | 24.89% | 26.18% | -18.18% | 28.73% | 18.33% | 31.22% | -4.57% | 21.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between NOBL and SPY is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2013 | 0.80 |
Over the past year, the correlation between NOBL and SPY has dropped to 0.40 - well below their long-term average of 0.80, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
NOBL vs. SPY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
NOBL
SPY
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Financial Services
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Real Estate
Energy
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
NOBL
SPY
Industrials
NOBL
SPY
Financial Services
NOBL
SPY
Healthcare
NOBL
SPY
Basic Materials
NOBL
SPY
Utilities
NOBL
SPY
Consumer Cyclical
NOBL
SPY
Technology
NOBL
SPY
Real Estate
NOBL
SPY
Energy
NOBL
SPY
Communication Services
NOBL
-
SPY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NOBL vs. SPY — Risk / Return Rank
NOBL
SPY
NOBL vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NOBL | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.92 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.38 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.45 | 2.87 | -1.43 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.69 | 12.95 | -9.26 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NOBL vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NOBL drawdown since its inception was -35.43%, smaller than the maximum SPY drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NOBL and SPY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NOBL | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.43% | -55.19% | +19.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.11% | -8.88% | -0.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.36% | -18.76% | +3.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.92% | -24.50% | +6.58% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.43% | -33.72% | -1.71% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.76% | -2.45% | -1.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.48% | -9.04% | +5.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.56% | 1.97% | +1.59% |
Volatility
NOBL vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) is 3.31%, while State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) has a volatility of 4.68%. This indicates that NOBL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NOBL | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.31% | 4.68% | -1.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.24% | 9.77% | -1.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.56% | 12.41% | -0.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.43% | 17.15% | -2.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.63% | 17.98% | -1.35% |
NOBL vs. SPY - Expense Ratio Comparison
NOBL has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than SPY's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
NOBL vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison
NOBL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.07%, more than SPY's 1.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NOBL ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 2.07% | 2.14% | 2.05% | 2.09% | 1.94% | 1.89% | 2.14% | 1.89% | 2.37% | 1.74% | 2.13% | 2.02% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 1.00% | 1.07% | 1.21% | 1.40% | 1.65% | 1.20% | 1.52% | 1.75% | 2.04% | 1.80% | 2.03% | 2.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NOBL and SPY have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPY has higher volatility (4.68%) compared to NOBL (3.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NOBL dropped -35.43% vs SPY's -55.19%.
On 10-year performance, SPY leads with 15.43% vs 9.76% for NOBL. On fees, SPY is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, NOBL has been the lower-risk option at 3.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPY has performed better with a 15.43% return vs 9.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPY is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for NOBL.
NOBL has the higher dividend yield at 2.07%, compared with 1.00% for SPY.
NOBL is categorized as Dividend, while SPY is S&P 500. NOBL tracks S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index, while SPY tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for NOBL and 0.09% for SPY.
SPY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NOBL and SPY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer