EET vs. EEM

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

EET (ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets) and EEM (iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EET is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Index (200%), while EEM is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Index (Net). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EET returned 11.03%/yr vs 9.93%/yr for EEM. With a 0.99 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. EET charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.72%/yr for EEM.

Performance

EET vs. EEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets (EET) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EET achieves a 54.14% return, which is significantly higher than EEM's 27.80% return. Over the past 10 years, EET has outperformed EEM with an annualized return of 11.03%, while EEM has yielded a comparatively lower 9.93% annualized return.

EET

• 1D: -2.52%
• 1M: 17.51%
• YTD: 54.14%
• 6M: 60.18%
• 1Y: 118.88%
• 3Y*: 38.53%
• 5Y*: 4.07%
• 10Y*: 11.03%

EEM

• 1D: -1.24%
• 1M: 9.08%
• YTD: 27.80%
• 6M: 30.51%
• 1Y: 55.80%
• 3Y*: 23.95%
• 5Y*: 7.01%
• 10Y*: 9.93%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EET vs. EEM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EET ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets	54.14%	63.14%	2.88%	7.06%	-43.07%	-10.93%	18.92%	31.87%	-33.84%	82.41%
EEM iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF	27.80%	33.98%	6.49%	8.95%	-20.56%	-3.63%	17.02%	18.22%	-15.31%	37.26%

Correlation

The correlation between EET and EEM is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.99
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.99
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.00
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.99
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2009	0.99

The correlation between EET and EEM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

EET vs. EEM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EET	EEM
Financial Services	51.5%	17.5%
Basic Materials	-	6.1%
Communication Services	-	5.7%
Consumer Cyclical	-	8.1%
Consumer Defensive	-	2.7%
Energy	-	3.3%
Healthcare	-	2.5%
Industrials	-	6.2%
Real Estate	-	0.9%
Technology	-	43.6%
Utilities	-	2.0%

Return for Risk

EET vs. EEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EET

EET Risk / Return Rank: 81
EET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
EET Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
EET Omega Ratio Rank: 77
EET Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
EET Martin Ratio Rank: 82

EEM

EEM Risk / Return Rank: 81
EEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
EEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
EEM Omega Ratio Rank: 83
EEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
EEM Martin Ratio Rank: 80

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EET vs. EEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets (EET) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EET	EEM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.02	2.81	+0.21
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.33	3.62	-0.29
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.46	1.51	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.53	4.15	+0.39
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.64	15.99	+0.65
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EET vs. EEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EET Sharpe Ratio is 3.02, which is comparable to the EEM Sharpe Ratio of 2.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EET and EEM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EET	EEM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.02	2.81	+0.21
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.11	0.37	-0.26
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.27	0.49	-0.21
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.12	0.38	-0.26

Drawdowns

EET vs. EEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EET drawdown since its inception was -71.66%, which is greater than EEM's maximum drawdown of -66.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EET and EEM.

Drawdown Indicators

	EET	EEM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-71.66%	-66.43%	-5.23%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-26.38%	-13.52%	-12.86%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-34.89%	-17.29%	-17.60%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-64.88%	-37.71%	-27.17%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-69.07%	-39.82%	-29.25%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.52%	-1.24%	-1.28%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-37.27%	-16.02%	-21.25%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.17%	3.50%	+3.67%

Volatility

EET vs. EEM - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets (EET) has a higher volatility of 17.46% compared to iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM) at 8.52%. This indicates that EET's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EET	EEM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	17.46%	8.52%	+8.94%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	34.52%	17.42%	+17.10%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	39.66%	19.97%	+19.69%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	37.78%	18.91%	+18.87%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	40.60%	20.50%	+20.10%

EET vs. EEM - Expense Ratio Comparison

EET has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than EEM's 0.72% expense ratio.

Dividends

EET vs. EEM - Dividend Comparison

EET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.23%, less than EEM's 1.74% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EEM iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF	1.74%	2.22%	2.43%	2.63%	2.50%	1.99%	1.45%	2.76%	2.24%	1.89%	1.89%	2.49%
EET ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets	1.23%	1.82%	3.85%	2.14%	0.00%	0.00%	0.01%	1.40%	0.16%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EET and EEM in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.99, EET and EEM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, EET or EEM?

EET has higher volatility (17.46%) compared to EEM (8.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EET dropped -71.66% vs EEM's -66.43%.

Which ETF is better, EET or EEM?

On 10-year performance, EET leads with 11.03% vs 9.93% for EEM. On fees, EEM is cheaper at 0.72% per year. On volatility, EEM has been the lower-risk option at 8.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EET or EEM?

Over the 10-year period, EET has performed better with a 11.03% return vs 9.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EET or EEM?

EEM is cheaper with a 0.72% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for EET.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EET or EEM?

EEM has the higher dividend yield at 1.74%, compared with 1.23% for EET.

What is the main difference between EET and EEM?

EET is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while EEM is Emerging Markets Diversified. EET tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Index (200%), while EEM tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Index (Net). They also come from different issuers: ProShares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for EET and 0.72% for EEM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EET currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.02 vs 2.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.