EET vs. XPP
Compare and contrast key facts about ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets (EET) and ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 (XPP).
EET and XPP are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EET is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Emerging Markets Index (200%). It was launched on Jun 2, 2009. XPP is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the FTSE/Xinhua China 25 Index (200%). It was launched on Jun 2, 2009. Both EET and XPP are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
EET vs. XPP - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EET vs. XPP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EET ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets | 5.67% | 63.14% | 2.88% | 7.06% | -43.07% | -10.93% | 18.92% | 31.87% | -33.84% | 82.41% |
XPP ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 | -16.13% | 45.84% | 38.18% | -34.77% | -50.06% | -40.45% | 7.07% | 24.88% | -31.36% | 80.21% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EET achieves a 5.67% return, which is significantly higher than XPP's -16.13% return. Over the past 10 years, EET has outperformed XPP with an annualized return of 6.62%, while XPP has yielded a comparatively lower -5.13% annualized return.
EET
- 1D
- 1.30%
- 1M
- -14.98%
- YTD
- 5.67%
- 6M
- 10.13%
- 1Y
- 60.53%
- 3Y*
- 21.80%
- 5Y*
- -2.13%
- 10Y*
- 6.62%
XPP
- 1D
- -1.79%
- 1M
- -8.28%
- YTD
- -16.13%
- 6M
- -28.23%
- 1Y
- -7.96%
- 3Y*
- 1.80%
- 5Y*
- -20.38%
- 10Y*
- -5.13%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EET vs. XPP - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both EET and XPP have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Return for Risk
EET vs. XPP — Risk / Return Rank
EET
XPP
EET vs. XPP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets (EET) and ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 (XPP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EET | XPP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.51 | -0.17 | +1.68 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.02 | 0.09 | +1.93 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.01 | +0.28 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.33 | -0.26 | +2.59 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.54 | -0.66 | +9.20 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EET | XPP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.51 | -0.17 | +1.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.06 | -0.33 | +0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.17 | -0.09 | +0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.07 | -0.09 | +0.16 |
Correlation
The correlation between EET and XPP is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
EET vs. XPP - Dividend Comparison
EET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.79%, less than XPP's 2.59% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EET ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets | 1.79% | 1.82% | 3.85% | 2.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% | 1.40% | 0.16% |
XPP ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 | 2.59% | 2.32% | 2.96% | 2.87% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.81% | 1.47% |
Drawdowns
EET vs. XPP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EET drawdown since its inception was -71.66%, smaller than the maximum XPP drawdown of -89.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EET and XPP.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EET | XPP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.66% | -89.90% | +18.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.38% | -32.09% | +5.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -64.98% | -85.54% | +20.56% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -69.07% | -89.90% | +20.83% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.02% | -77.80% | +54.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -37.57% | -47.52% | +9.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.19% | 12.74% | -5.55% |
Volatility
EET vs. XPP - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets (EET) has a higher volatility of 19.08% compared to ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 (XPP) at 13.51%. This indicates that EET's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XPP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EET | XPP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.08% | 13.51% | +5.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.39% | 29.10% | +1.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.29% | 47.46% | -7.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.90% | 62.66% | -25.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.26% | 54.97% | -14.71% |