EET vs. XPP

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

EET (ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets) and XPP (ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50) are both Leveraged Equities funds from ProShares - EET tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets Index (200%) while XPP tracks the FTSE/Xinhua China 25 Index (200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EET returned 10.67%/yr vs -6.44%/yr for XPP. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.

Performance

EET vs. XPP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets (EET) and ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 (XPP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EET achieves a 41.10% return, which is significantly higher than XPP's -31.49% return. Over the past 10 years, EET has outperformed XPP with an annualized return of 10.67%, while XPP has yielded a comparatively lower -6.44% annualized return.

EET

• 1D: -0.60%
• 1M: 2.69%
• YTD: 41.10%
• 6M: 42.83%
• 1Y: 81.79%
• 3Y*: 34.98%
• 5Y*: 2.48%
• 10Y*: 10.67%

XPP

• 1D: -3.69%
• 1M: -16.86%
• YTD: -31.49%
• 6M: -32.53%
• 1Y: -28.66%
• 3Y*: 2.25%
• 5Y*: -23.26%
• 10Y*: -6.44%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EET vs. XPP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EET ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets	41.10%	63.14%	2.88%	7.06%	-43.07%	-10.93%	18.92%	31.87%	-33.84%	82.41%
XPP ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50	-31.49%	45.84%	38.18%	-34.77%	-50.06%	-40.45%	7.07%	24.88%	-31.36%	80.21%

Correlation

The correlation between EET and XPP is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.65
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.75
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.80
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.83
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2009	0.84

The correlation between EET and XPP shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (1 year) to 0.84 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EET vs. XPP - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EET	XPP
Financial Services	41.4%	48.1%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

EET vs. XPP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EET

EET Risk / Return Rank: 62
EET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
EET Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
EET Omega Ratio Rank: 61
EET Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
EET Martin Ratio Rank: 67

XPP

XPP Risk / Return Rank: 3
XPP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
XPP Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
XPP Omega Ratio Rank: 4
XPP Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
XPP Martin Ratio Rank: 1

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EET vs. XPP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets (EET) and ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 (XPP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EET	XPP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.83	-0.73	+2.56
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.24	-0.92	+3.16
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	0.89	+0.43
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.12	-0.68	+3.80
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.84	-1.60	+12.44

EET vs. XPP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EET Sharpe Ratio is 1.83, which is higher than the XPP Sharpe Ratio of -0.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EET and XPP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EET vs. XPP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EET drawdown since its inception was -71.66%, smaller than the maximum XPP drawdown of -89.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EET and XPP.

Drawdown Indicators

	EET	XPP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-71.66%	-89.90%	+18.24%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-26.38%	-42.34%	+15.96%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-34.89%	-52.95%	+18.06%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-64.51%	-85.24%	+20.73%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-69.07%	-89.90%	+20.83%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.38%	-81.87%	+70.49%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-37.16%	-47.91%	+10.75%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.57%	17.99%	-10.42%

Volatility

EET vs. XPP - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets (EET) has a higher volatility of 25.42% compared to ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 (XPP) at 12.82%. This indicates that EET's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XPP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EET	XPP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	25.42%	12.82%	+12.60%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	41.30%	29.60%	+11.70%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	45.20%	39.55%	+5.65%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	39.04%	62.86%	-23.82%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	40.96%	54.79%	-13.83%

EET vs. XPP - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both EET and XPP have an expense ratio of 0.95%.

Dividends

EET vs. XPP - Dividend Comparison

EET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.34%, less than XPP's 3.17% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
EET ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets	1.34%	1.82%	3.85%	2.14%	0.00%	0.00%	0.01%	1.40%	0.16%
XPP ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50	3.17%	2.32%	2.96%	2.87%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	3.81%	1.47%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EET and XPP in my portfolio?

EET and XPP have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EET or XPP?

EET has higher volatility (25.42%) compared to XPP (12.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EET dropped -71.66% vs XPP's -89.90%.

Which ETF is better, EET or XPP?

On 10-year performance, EET leads with 10.67% vs -6.44% for XPP. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, XPP has been the lower-risk option at 12.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EET or XPP?

Over the 10-year period, EET has performed better with a 10.67% return vs -6.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EET or XPP?

EET and XPP have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EET or XPP?

XPP has the higher dividend yield at 3.17%, compared with 1.34% for EET.

What is the main difference between EET and XPP?

EET tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Index (200%), while XPP tracks FTSE/Xinhua China 25 Index (200%).

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EET currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs -0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.