EET vs. QQQ

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

EET (ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets) and QQQ (Invesco QQQ ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EET is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Index (200%), while QQQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EET returned 10.74%/yr vs 22.07%/yr for QQQ. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EET charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for QQQ.

Performance

EET vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets (EET) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EET achieves a 41.96% return, which is significantly higher than QQQ's 16.45% return. Over the past 10 years, EET has underperformed QQQ with an annualized return of 10.74%, while QQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 22.07% annualized return.

EET

• 1D: -10.85%
• 1M: 3.31%
• YTD: 41.96%
• 6M: 44.12%
• 1Y: 92.41%
• 3Y*: 35.25%
• 5Y*: 2.91%
• 10Y*: 10.74%

QQQ

• 1D: -3.29%
• 1M: -0.43%
• YTD: 16.45%
• 6M: 14.99%
• 1Y: 34.88%
• 3Y*: 26.05%
• 5Y*: 16.01%
• 10Y*: 22.07%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EET vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EET ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets	41.96%	63.14%	2.88%	7.06%	-43.07%	-10.93%	18.92%	31.87%	-33.84%	82.41%
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF	16.45%	20.77%	25.58%	54.86%	-32.58%	27.42%	48.62%	38.96%	-0.13%	32.66%

Correlation

The correlation between EET and QQQ is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.78
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.66
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.65
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.66
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2009	0.67

The correlation between EET and QQQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (5 years) to 0.78 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EET vs. QQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EET	QQQ
Financial Services	41.4%	0.2%
Basic Materials	-	1.0%
Communication Services	-	14.3%
Consumer Cyclical	-	11.4%
Consumer Defensive	-	6.4%
Energy	-	0.5%
Healthcare	-	3.7%
Industrials	-	2.6%
Real Estate	-	0.1%
Technology	-	58.7%
Utilities	-	1.2%

Return for Risk

EET vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EET

EET Risk / Return Rank: 66
EET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
EET Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
EET Omega Ratio Rank: 63
EET Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
EET Martin Ratio Rank: 71

QQQ

QQQ Risk / Return Rank: 59
QQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
QQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
QQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 58
QQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
QQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 62

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EET vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets (EET) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EET	QQQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.06	1.95	+0.10
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.43	2.57	-0.14
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.35	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.52	2.93	+0.59
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.31	10.86	+1.44

EET vs. QQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EET Sharpe Ratio is 2.06, which is comparable to the QQQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EET and QQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EET vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EET drawdown since its inception was -71.66%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EET and QQQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	EET	QQQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-71.66%	-82.97%	+11.31%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-26.38%	-11.96%	-14.42%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-34.89%	-22.77%	-12.12%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-64.51%	-35.12%	-29.39%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-69.07%	-35.12%	-33.95%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.85%	-4.25%	-6.60%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-37.17%	-32.73%	-4.44%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.54%	3.22%	+4.32%

Volatility

EET vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets (EET) has a higher volatility of 25.42% compared to Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) at 9.17%. This indicates that EET's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EET	QQQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	25.42%	9.17%	+16.25%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	41.32%	14.57%	+26.75%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	45.21%	17.96%	+27.25%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	39.05%	22.69%	+16.36%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	40.97%	22.42%	+18.55%

EET vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

EET has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio.

Dividends

EET vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison

EET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.33%, more than QQQ's 0.43% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EET ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets	1.33%	1.82%	3.85%	2.14%	0.00%	0.00%	0.01%	1.40%	0.16%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF	0.43%	0.45%	0.56%	0.62%	0.80%	0.43%	0.55%	0.74%	0.91%	0.84%	1.06%	0.99%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EET and QQQ in my portfolio?

EET and QQQ have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EET or QQQ?

EET has higher volatility (25.42%) compared to QQQ (9.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EET dropped -71.66% vs QQQ's -82.97%.

Which ETF is better, EET or QQQ?

On 10-year performance, QQQ leads with 22.07% vs 10.74% for EET. On fees, QQQ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, QQQ has been the lower-risk option at 9.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EET or QQQ?

Over the 10-year period, QQQ has performed better with a 22.07% return vs 10.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EET or QQQ?

QQQ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for EET.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EET or QQQ?

EET has the higher dividend yield at 1.33%, compared with 0.43% for QQQ.

What is the main difference between EET and QQQ?

EET is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while QQQ is Nasdaq-100. EET tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Index (200%), while QQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for EET and 0.18% for QQQ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EET currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.