PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
EET vs. EDC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

EET vs. EDC

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

EET (ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets) and EDC (Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bull 3X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds - EET tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets Index (200%) while EDC tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets Index (300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EET returned 10.74%/yr vs 8.13%/yr for EDC. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. EET charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.33%/yr for EDC.

Performance

EET vs. EDC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets (EET) and Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bull 3X Shares (EDC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EET achieves a 41.96% return, which is significantly lower than EDC's 55.46% return. Over the past 10 years, EET has outperformed EDC with an annualized return of 10.74%, while EDC has yielded a comparatively lower 8.13% annualized return.

EET

1D
-10.85%
1M
3.31%
YTD
41.96%
6M
44.12%
1Y
92.41%
3Y*
35.25%
5Y*
2.91%
10Y*
10.74%

EDC

1D
-17.43%
1M
1.18%
YTD
55.46%
6M
58.75%
1Y
138.81%
3Y*
45.52%
5Y*
-2.63%
10Y*
8.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EET vs. EDC - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EET
ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets		41.96%63.14%2.88%7.06%-43.07%-10.93%18.92%31.87%-33.84%82.41%
EDC
Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bull 3X Shares		55.46%94.58%-2.00%7.48%-60.25%-20.81%6.49%43.92%-49.87%138.61%

Correlation

The correlation between EET and EDC is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2009

0.98

The correlation between EET and EDC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

EET vs. EDC - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
EET
EDC

Financial Services

41.4%
20.8%

Basic Materials

-

7.0%

Communication Services

-

7.8%

Consumer Cyclical

-

10.3%

Consumer Defensive

-

3.2%

Energy

-

4.4%

Healthcare

-

3.2%

Industrials

-

7.3%

Real Estate

-

1.1%

Technology

-

32.7%

Utilities

-

2.2%

Financial Services

EET
41.4%
EDC
20.8%

Basic Materials

EET

-

EDC
7.0%

Communication Services

EET

-

EDC
7.8%

Consumer Cyclical

EET

-

EDC
10.3%

Consumer Defensive

EET

-

EDC
3.2%

Energy

EET

-

EDC
4.4%

Healthcare

EET

-

EDC
3.2%

Industrials

EET

-

EDC
7.3%

Real Estate

EET

-

EDC
1.1%

Technology

EET

-

EDC
32.7%

Utilities

EET

-

EDC
2.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets

Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bull 3X Shares

Often compared with EET:
EET vs. EFOEET vs. EEMEET vs. XPPEET vs. QQQEET vs. EEMAEET vs. VWOEET vs. VOO
Often compared with EDC:
EDC vs. EDZEDC vs. EEMEDC vs. YINNEDC vs. EDIVEDC vs. TMFEDC vs. UPROEDC vs. SOXL

Return for Risk

EET vs. EDC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
EET
EET Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
EET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EET Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
EET Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
EET Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
EET Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
EDC
EDC Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
EDC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EDC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
EDC Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
EDC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
EDC Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EET vs. EDC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets (EET) and Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bull 3X Shares (EDC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

EETEDCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.06
2.05

+0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.43
2.37

+0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.35

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.52

3.68

-0.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.31

12.31

0.00

EET vs. EDC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EET Sharpe Ratio is 2.06, which is comparable to the EDC Sharpe Ratio of 2.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EET and EDC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EET vs. EDC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EET drawdown since its inception was -71.66%, smaller than the maximum EDC drawdown of -92.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EET and EDC.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

EETEDCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.66%

-92.54%

+20.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.38%

-37.98%

+11.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.89%

-49.48%

+14.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-64.51%

-80.70%

+16.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-69.07%

-87.01%

+17.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.85%

-67.00%

+56.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-37.17%

-65.34%

+28.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.54%

11.33%

-3.79%

Volatility

EET vs. EDC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets (EET) is 25.42%, while Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bull 3X Shares (EDC) has a volatility of 39.16%. This indicates that EET experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EDC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

EETEDCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

25.42%

39.16%

-13.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

41.32%

62.81%

-21.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

45.21%

68.25%

-23.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

39.05%

58.62%

-19.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.97%

61.23%

-20.26%

EET vs. EDC - Expense Ratio Comparison

EET has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than EDC's 1.33% expense ratio.

Dividends

EET vs. EDC - Dividend Comparison

EET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.33%, more than EDC's 1.10% yield.

PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
EDC
Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bull 3X Shares		1.10%1.79%3.94%3.54%0.00%0.18%0.44%0.97%0.78%0.25%
EET
ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets		1.33%1.82%3.85%2.14%0.00%0.00%0.01%1.40%0.16%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

With a correlation of 0.99, EET and EDC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

EDC has higher volatility (39.16%) compared to EET (25.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EET dropped -71.66% vs EDC's -92.54%.

On 10-year performance, EET leads with 10.74% vs 8.13% for EDC. On fees, EET is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, EET has been the lower-risk option at 25.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, EET has performed better with a 10.74% return vs 8.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EET is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.33% for EDC.

EET has the higher dividend yield at 1.33%, compared with 1.10% for EDC.

EET tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Index (200%), while EDC tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Index (300%). They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for EET and 1.33% for EDC.

EET currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 2.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EET and EDC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer