NOBL vs. KNG

Last updated Jun 18, 2026

NOBL (ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF) and KNG (FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF) are both Dividend funds - NOBL tracks the S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index while KNG tracks the Cboe S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income Index Monthly Series. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, NOBL returned 6.56%/yr vs 5.77%/yr for KNG. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. NOBL charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for KNG.

Performance

NOBL vs. KNG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) and FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF (KNG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NOBL achieves a 5.96% return, which is significantly higher than KNG's 4.42% return.

NOBL

• 1D: -1.70%
• 1M: 2.78%
• YTD: 5.96%
• 6M: 5.27%
• 1Y: 13.12%
• 3Y*: 7.61%
• 5Y*: 6.56%
• 10Y*: 9.76%

KNG

• 1D: -1.49%
• 1M: 2.55%
• YTD: 4.42%
• 6M: 3.85%
• 1Y: 11.13%
• 3Y*: 6.60%
• 5Y*: 5.77%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NOBL vs. KNG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
NOBL ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF	5.96%	6.84%	6.72%	8.09%	-6.52%	25.46%	8.35%	27.39%	-0.33%
KNG FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF	4.42%	6.63%	5.99%	7.48%	-7.03%	24.78%	7.21%	26.64%	-1.56%

Correlation

The correlation between NOBL and KNG is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.99
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.99
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.99
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2018	0.97

The correlation between NOBL and KNG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

NOBL vs. KNG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	NOBL	KNG
Consumer Defensive	23.6%	23.6%
Industrials	20.2%	20.2%
Financial Services	12.8%	12.8%
Healthcare	10.2%	10.2%
Basic Materials	10.2%	10.2%
Utilities	5.7%	5.7%
Consumer Cyclical	5.3%	5.3%
Technology	4.6%	4.6%
Real Estate	4.6%	4.6%
Energy	2.9%	2.9%
Communication Services	-	-

Return for Risk

NOBL vs. KNG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NOBL

NOBL Risk / Return Rank: 31
NOBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
NOBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
NOBL Omega Ratio Rank: 29
NOBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
NOBL Martin Ratio Rank: 28

KNG

KNG Risk / Return Rank: 29
KNG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
KNG Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
KNG Omega Ratio Rank: 28
KNG Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
KNG Martin Ratio Rank: 25

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NOBL vs. KNG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) and FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF (KNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NOBL	KNG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.15	1.08	+0.07
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.74	1.64	+0.10
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.19	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.45	1.30	+0.15
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.69	3.29	+0.40

NOBL vs. KNG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NOBL Sharpe Ratio is 1.15, which is comparable to the KNG Sharpe Ratio of 1.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NOBL and KNG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

NOBL vs. KNG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NOBL drawdown since its inception was -35.43%, roughly equal to the maximum KNG drawdown of -35.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NOBL and KNG.

Drawdown Indicators

	NOBL	KNG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.43%	-35.12%	-0.31%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.11%	-8.61%	-0.50%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.36%	-14.24%	-1.12%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.92%	-18.20%	+0.28%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.43%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.76%	-3.85%	+0.09%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.48%	-4.13%	+0.65%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.56%	3.39%	+0.17%

Volatility

NOBL vs. KNG - Volatility Comparison

ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) has a higher volatility of 3.31% compared to FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF (KNG) at 2.99%. This indicates that NOBL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KNG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NOBL	KNG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.31%	2.99%	+0.32%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.24%	7.62%	+0.62%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.56%	10.44%	+1.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.43%	13.63%	+0.80%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.63%	17.16%	-0.53%

NOBL vs. KNG - Expense Ratio Comparison

NOBL has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than KNG's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

NOBL vs. KNG - Dividend Comparison

NOBL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.07%, less than KNG's 8.49% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
KNG FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF	8.49%	8.61%	9.08%	5.91%	4.00%	3.45%	3.62%	4.09%	3.46%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
NOBL ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF	2.07%	2.14%	2.05%	2.09%	1.94%	1.89%	2.14%	1.89%	2.37%	1.74%	2.13%	2.02%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NOBL and KNG in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.99, NOBL and KNG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, NOBL or KNG?

NOBL has higher volatility (3.31%) compared to KNG (2.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NOBL dropped -35.43% vs KNG's -35.12%.

Which ETF is better, NOBL or KNG?

On 5-year performance, NOBL leads with 6.56% vs 5.77% for KNG. On fees, NOBL is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, KNG has been the lower-risk option at 2.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, NOBL or KNG?

Over the 5-year period, NOBL has performed better with a 6.56% return vs 5.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, NOBL or KNG?

NOBL is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for KNG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NOBL or KNG?

KNG has the higher dividend yield at 8.49%, compared with 2.07% for NOBL.

What is the main difference between NOBL and KNG?

NOBL tracks S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index, while KNG tracks Cboe S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income Index Monthly Series. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for NOBL and 0.75% for KNG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NOBL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.15 vs 1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.