NOBL vs. DGRO
Compare and contrast key facts about ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO).
NOBL and DGRO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. NOBL is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index. It was launched on Oct 9, 2013. DGRO is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index. It was launched on Jun 10, 2014. Both NOBL and DGRO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: NOBL or DGRO.
Correlation
The correlation between NOBL and DGRO is 0.94, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
NOBL vs. DGRO - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
NOBL:
0.95
DGRO:
1.91
NOBL:
1.37
DGRO:
2.69
NOBL:
1.17
DGRO:
1.35
NOBL:
1.25
DGRO:
3.15
NOBL:
3.89
DGRO:
11.43
NOBL:
2.50%
DGRO:
1.63%
NOBL:
10.26%
DGRO:
9.75%
NOBL:
-35.43%
DGRO:
-35.10%
NOBL:
-7.11%
DGRO:
-4.91%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NOBL achieves a 7.38% return, which is significantly lower than DGRO's 16.70% return. Over the past 10 years, NOBL has underperformed DGRO with an annualized return of 9.36%, while DGRO has yielded a comparatively higher 11.26% annualized return.
NOBL
7.38%
-4.11%
4.12%
8.64%
8.12%
9.36%
DGRO
16.70%
-2.05%
7.52%
17.72%
10.51%
11.26%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
NOBL vs. DGRO - Expense Ratio Comparison
NOBL has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than DGRO's 0.08% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
NOBL vs. DGRO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
NOBL vs. DGRO - Dividend Comparison
NOBL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.45%, less than DGRO's 2.26% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NOBL ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 1.45% | 2.09% | 1.94% | 1.89% | 2.14% | 1.89% | 2.37% | 1.74% | 2.13% | 2.02% | 1.60% | 0.30% |
DGRO iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF | 2.26% | 2.45% | 2.34% | 1.93% | 2.30% | 2.21% | 2.44% | 2.03% | 2.27% | 2.52% | 0.97% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
NOBL vs. DGRO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NOBL drawdown since its inception was -35.43%, roughly equal to the maximum DGRO drawdown of -35.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NOBL and DGRO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
NOBL vs. DGRO - Volatility Comparison
ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) have volatilities of 3.48% and 3.52%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.