NOBL vs. VOO

Last updated Jul 28, 2026

NOBL (ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF) and VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NOBL is a Dividend fund tracking the S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index, while VOO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, NOBL returned 9.85%/yr vs 14.93%/yr for VOO. Their 0.79 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. NOBL charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VOO.

Performance

NOBL vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NOBL achieves a 11.60% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's 8.98% return. Over the past 10 years, NOBL has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 9.85%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 14.93% annualized return.

NOBL

• 1D: 0.98%
• 1M: 2.10%
• 6M: 6.02%
• YTD: 11.60%
• 1Y: 12.24%
• 3Y*: 8.21%
• 5Y*: 6.79%
• 10Y*: 9.85%
• ALL TIME*: 10.77%

VOO

• 1D: 0.03%
• 1M: 1.35%
• 6M: 7.28%
• YTD: 8.98%
• 1Y: 17.38%
• 3Y*: 18.94%
• 5Y*: 12.57%
• 10Y*: 14.93%
• ALL TIME*: 14.72%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
NOBL ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF	$66.18M	$67.22M	$58.93M
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF	$3.33B	$3.89B	$5.42B

NOBL vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
NOBL ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF	11.60%	6.84%	6.72%	8.09%	-6.52%	25.46%	8.35%	27.39%	-3.26%	21.02%
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF	8.98%	17.82%	24.98%	26.32%	-18.17%	28.79%	18.32%	31.37%	-4.50%	21.77%

Correlation

The correlation between NOBL and VOO is 0.30, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.30
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.53
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.68
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.75
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2013	0.79

Over the past year, the correlation between NOBL and VOO has dropped to 0.30 - well below their long-term average of 0.79, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

NOBL vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	NOBL	VOO
Consumer Defensive	23.5%	4.5%
Industrials	20.1%	8.5%
Financial Services	13.3%	11.4%
Healthcare	10.9%	8.9%
Basic Materials	9.4%	1.7%
Utilities	5.7%	2.2%
Consumer Cyclical	5.3%	9.5%
Real Estate	4.6%	1.8%
Technology	4.3%	38.6%
Energy	2.8%	3.0%
Communication Services	-	9.9%

Return for Risk

NOBL vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NOBL

NOBL Risk / Return Rank: 39
NOBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
NOBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
NOBL Omega Ratio Rank: 38
NOBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
NOBL Martin Ratio Rank: 34

VOO

VOO Risk / Return Rank: 59
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 57
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 69

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NOBL vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NOBL	VOO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.04	1.38	-0.34
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.62	1.94	-0.32
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.25	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.35	1.96	-0.61
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.42	8.43	-5.02

NOBL vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NOBL Sharpe Ratio is 1.04, which is comparable to the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 1.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NOBL and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

NOBL vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NOBL drawdown since its inception was -35.43%, roughly equal to the maximum VOO drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NOBL and VOO.

Drawdown Indicators

	NOBL	VOO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.43%	-33.99%	-1.44%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.11%	-8.90%	-0.21%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.36%	-18.69%	+3.33%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.92%	-24.52%	+6.60%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.43%	-33.99%	-1.44%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.42%	-2.43%	+2.01%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.47%	-3.67%	+0.20%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.61%	2.07%	+1.54%

Volatility

NOBL vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) has a higher volatility of 4.53% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 3.22%. This indicates that NOBL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NOBL	VOO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.53%	3.22%	+1.31%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.83%	9.84%	-1.01%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.80%	12.64%	-0.84%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.45%	16.91%	-2.46%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.62%	18.01%	-1.39%

NOBL vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

NOBL has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

NOBL vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

NOBL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.03%, more than VOO's 1.08% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
NOBL ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF	2.03%	2.14%	2.05%	2.09%	1.94%	1.89%	2.14%	1.89%	2.37%	1.74%	2.13%	2.02%
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF	1.08%	1.13%	1.24%	1.46%	1.69%	1.25%	1.54%	1.88%	2.06%	1.78%	2.02%	2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NOBL and VOO in my portfolio?

NOBL and VOO have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NOBL or VOO?

NOBL has higher volatility (4.53%) compared to VOO (3.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NOBL dropped -35.43% vs VOO's -33.99%.

Which ETF is better, NOBL or VOO?

On 10-year performance, VOO leads with 14.93% vs 9.85% for NOBL. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VOO has been the lower-risk option at 3.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, NOBL or VOO?

Over the 10-year period, VOO has performed better with a 14.93% return vs 9.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, NOBL or VOO?

VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for NOBL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NOBL or VOO?

NOBL has the higher dividend yield at 2.03%, compared with 1.08% for VOO.

What is the main difference between NOBL and VOO?

NOBL is categorized as Dividend, while VOO is S&P 500. NOBL tracks S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index, while VOO tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for NOBL and 0.03% for VOO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.38 vs 1.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.