NOBL vs. VIG
NOBL (ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF) and VIG (Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF) are both Dividend funds - NOBL tracks the S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index while VIG tracks the S&P U.S. Dividend Growers Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, NOBL returned 9.76%/yr vs 13.22%/yr for VIG. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. NOBL charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for VIG.
Performance
NOBL vs. VIG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NOBL achieves a 5.96% return, which is significantly lower than VIG's 7.16% return. Over the past 10 years, NOBL has underperformed VIG with an annualized return of 9.76%, while VIG has yielded a comparatively higher 13.22% annualized return.
NOBL
- 1D
- -1.70%
- 1M
- 2.78%
- YTD
- 5.96%
- 6M
- 5.27%
- 1Y
- 13.12%
- 3Y*
- 7.61%
- 5Y*
- 6.56%
- 10Y*
- 9.76%
VIG
- 1D
- -0.93%
- 1M
- 1.80%
- YTD
- 7.16%
- 6M
- 7.98%
- 1Y
- 19.50%
- 3Y*
- 15.37%
- 5Y*
- 11.34%
- 10Y*
- 13.22%
NOBL vs. VIG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NOBL ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 5.96% | 6.84% | 6.72% | 8.09% | -6.52% | 25.46% | 8.35% | 27.39% | -3.26% | 21.02% |
VIG Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF | 7.16% | 14.17% | 16.99% | 14.51% | -9.80% | 23.76% | 15.43% | 29.62% | -2.08% | 22.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between NOBL and VIG is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2013 | 0.91 |
Over the past year, the correlation between NOBL and VIG has dropped to 0.69 - well below their long-term average of 0.91, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
NOBL vs. VIG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
NOBL
VIG
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Financial Services
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Real Estate
-
Energy
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
NOBL
VIG
Industrials
NOBL
VIG
Financial Services
NOBL
VIG
Healthcare
NOBL
VIG
Basic Materials
NOBL
VIG
Utilities
NOBL
VIG
Consumer Cyclical
NOBL
VIG
Technology
NOBL
VIG
Real Estate
NOBL
VIG
-
Energy
NOBL
VIG
Communication Services
NOBL
-
VIG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NOBL vs. VIG — Risk / Return Rank
NOBL
VIG
NOBL vs. VIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) and Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NOBL | VIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.79 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.35 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.45 | 2.48 | -1.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.69 | 10.00 | -6.31 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NOBL vs. VIG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NOBL drawdown since its inception was -35.43%, smaller than the maximum VIG drawdown of -46.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NOBL and VIG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NOBL | VIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.43% | -46.81% | +11.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.11% | -7.91% | -1.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.36% | -14.95% | -0.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.92% | -20.39% | +2.47% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.43% | -31.72% | -3.71% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.76% | -0.96% | -2.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.48% | -5.50% | +2.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.56% | 1.95% | +1.61% |
Volatility
NOBL vs. VIG - Volatility Comparison
ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) has a higher volatility of 3.31% compared to Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG) at 2.90%. This indicates that NOBL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VIG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NOBL | VIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.31% | 2.90% | +0.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.24% | 7.74% | +0.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.56% | 10.17% | +1.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.43% | 14.26% | +0.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.63% | 16.06% | +0.57% |
NOBL vs. VIG - Expense Ratio Comparison
NOBL has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than VIG's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
NOBL vs. VIG - Dividend Comparison
NOBL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.07%, more than VIG's 1.47% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NOBL ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 2.07% | 2.14% | 2.05% | 2.09% | 1.94% | 1.89% | 2.14% | 1.89% | 2.37% | 1.74% | 2.13% | 2.02% |
VIG Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF | 1.47% | 1.62% | 1.73% | 1.88% | 1.96% | 1.55% | 1.63% | 1.71% | 2.08% | 1.88% | 2.14% | 2.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NOBL and VIG have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NOBL has higher volatility (3.31%) compared to VIG (2.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NOBL dropped -35.43% vs VIG's -46.81%.
On 10-year performance, VIG leads with 13.22% vs 9.76% for NOBL. On fees, VIG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VIG has been the lower-risk option at 2.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VIG has performed better with a 13.22% return vs 9.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VIG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for NOBL.
NOBL has the higher dividend yield at 2.07%, compared with 1.47% for VIG.
NOBL tracks S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index, while VIG tracks S&P U.S. Dividend Growers Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for NOBL and 0.04% for VIG.
VIG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.93 vs 1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NOBL and VIG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer