PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NOBL vs. SCHD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NOBL vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NOBL achieves a 5.96% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 17.39% return. Over the past 10 years, NOBL has underperformed SCHD with an annualized return of 9.76%, while SCHD has yielded a comparatively higher 12.59% annualized return.


NOBL

1D
-1.70%
1M
2.78%
YTD
5.96%
6M
5.27%
1Y
13.12%
3Y*
7.61%
5Y*
6.56%
10Y*
9.76%

SCHD

1D
-1.84%
1M
-0.34%
YTD
17.39%
6M
16.67%
1Y
24.12%
3Y*
13.46%
5Y*
9.12%
10Y*
12.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NOBL vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NOBL
ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF
5.96%6.84%6.72%8.09%-6.52%25.46%8.35%27.39%-3.26%21.02%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
17.39%4.34%11.66%4.54%-3.26%29.87%15.03%27.29%-5.56%20.85%

Correlation

The correlation between NOBL and SCHD is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2013

0.92

The correlation between NOBL and SCHD shifts across timeframes, from 0.81 (1 year) to 0.92 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

NOBL vs. SCHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
NOBL
SCHD

Consumer Defensive

23.6%
18.5%

Industrials

20.2%
7.4%

Financial Services

12.8%
9.1%

Healthcare

10.2%
18.4%

Basic Materials

10.2%
1.2%

Utilities

5.7%
0.0%

Consumer Cyclical

5.3%
6.7%

Technology

4.6%
19.4%

Real Estate

4.6%

-

Energy

2.9%
14.6%

Communication Services

-

6.0%

Consumer Defensive

NOBL
23.6%
SCHD
18.5%

Industrials

NOBL
20.2%
SCHD
7.4%

Financial Services

NOBL
12.8%
SCHD
9.1%

Healthcare

NOBL
10.2%
SCHD
18.4%

Basic Materials

NOBL
10.2%
SCHD
1.2%

Utilities

NOBL
5.7%
SCHD
0.0%

Consumer Cyclical

NOBL
5.3%
SCHD
6.7%

Technology

NOBL
4.6%
SCHD
19.4%

Real Estate

NOBL
4.6%
SCHD

-

Energy

NOBL
2.9%
SCHD
14.6%

Communication Services

NOBL

-

SCHD
6.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NOBL vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NOBL
NOBL Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
NOBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NOBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
NOBL Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
NOBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
NOBL Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHD
SCHD Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
SCHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHD Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHD Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NOBL vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NOBLSCHDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.39

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.45

5.25

-3.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.69

12.86

-9.17

NOBL vs. SCHD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NOBL Sharpe Ratio is 1.15, which is lower than the SCHD Sharpe Ratio of 2.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NOBL and SCHD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NOBL vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NOBL drawdown since its inception was -35.43%, which is greater than SCHD's maximum drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NOBL and SCHD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NOBLSCHDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.43%

-33.37%

-2.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.11%

-4.61%

-4.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.36%

-16.13%

+0.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.92%

-16.85%

-1.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.43%

-33.37%

-2.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.76%

-2.74%

-1.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.48%

-3.31%

-0.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.56%

1.88%

+1.68%

Volatility

NOBL vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) is 3.31%, while Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) has a volatility of 3.58%. This indicates that NOBL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NOBLSCHDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.31%

3.58%

-0.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.24%

7.83%

+0.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.56%

11.10%

+0.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.43%

14.40%

+0.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.63%

16.73%

-0.10%

NOBL vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison

NOBL has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

NOBL vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison

NOBL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.07%, less than SCHD's 3.31% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NOBL
ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF
2.07%2.14%2.05%2.09%1.94%1.89%2.14%1.89%2.37%1.74%2.13%2.02%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
3.31%3.82%3.64%3.49%3.39%2.78%3.16%2.98%3.06%2.63%2.89%2.97%

Frequently Asked Questions


NOBL and SCHD have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCHD has higher volatility (3.58%) compared to NOBL (3.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NOBL dropped -35.43% vs SCHD's -33.37%.

On 10-year performance, SCHD leads with 12.59% vs 9.76% for NOBL. On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, NOBL has been the lower-risk option at 3.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SCHD has performed better with a 12.59% return vs 9.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for NOBL.

SCHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.31%, compared with 2.07% for NOBL.

NOBL tracks S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index, while SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for NOBL and 0.06% for SCHD.

SCHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NOBL and SCHD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer