NOBL vs. SCHD
NOBL (ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF) and SCHD (Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF) are both Dividend funds - NOBL tracks the S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index while SCHD tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, NOBL returned 9.76%/yr vs 12.59%/yr for SCHD. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. NOBL charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for SCHD.
Performance
NOBL vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NOBL achieves a 5.96% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 17.39% return. Over the past 10 years, NOBL has underperformed SCHD with an annualized return of 9.76%, while SCHD has yielded a comparatively higher 12.59% annualized return.
NOBL
- 1D
- -1.70%
- 1M
- 2.78%
- YTD
- 5.96%
- 6M
- 5.27%
- 1Y
- 13.12%
- 3Y*
- 7.61%
- 5Y*
- 6.56%
- 10Y*
- 9.76%
SCHD
- 1D
- -1.84%
- 1M
- -0.34%
- YTD
- 17.39%
- 6M
- 16.67%
- 1Y
- 24.12%
- 3Y*
- 13.46%
- 5Y*
- 9.12%
- 10Y*
- 12.59%
NOBL vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NOBL ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 5.96% | 6.84% | 6.72% | 8.09% | -6.52% | 25.46% | 8.35% | 27.39% | -3.26% | 21.02% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 17.39% | 4.34% | 11.66% | 4.54% | -3.26% | 29.87% | 15.03% | 27.29% | -5.56% | 20.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between NOBL and SCHD is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2013 | 0.92 |
The correlation between NOBL and SCHD shifts across timeframes, from 0.81 (1 year) to 0.92 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
NOBL vs. SCHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
NOBL
SCHD
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Financial Services
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Real Estate
-
Energy
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
NOBL
SCHD
Industrials
NOBL
SCHD
Financial Services
NOBL
SCHD
Healthcare
NOBL
SCHD
Basic Materials
NOBL
SCHD
Utilities
NOBL
SCHD
Consumer Cyclical
NOBL
SCHD
Technology
NOBL
SCHD
Real Estate
NOBL
SCHD
-
Energy
NOBL
SCHD
Communication Services
NOBL
-
SCHD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NOBL vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank
NOBL
SCHD
NOBL vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NOBL | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.39 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.45 | 5.25 | -3.80 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.69 | 12.86 | -9.17 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NOBL vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NOBL drawdown since its inception was -35.43%, which is greater than SCHD's maximum drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NOBL and SCHD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NOBL | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.43% | -33.37% | -2.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.11% | -4.61% | -4.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.36% | -16.13% | +0.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.92% | -16.85% | -1.07% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.43% | -33.37% | -2.06% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.76% | -2.74% | -1.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.48% | -3.31% | -0.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.56% | 1.88% | +1.68% |
Volatility
NOBL vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) is 3.31%, while Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) has a volatility of 3.58%. This indicates that NOBL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NOBL | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.31% | 3.58% | -0.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.24% | 7.83% | +0.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.56% | 11.10% | +0.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.43% | 14.40% | +0.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.63% | 16.73% | -0.10% |
NOBL vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison
NOBL has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
NOBL vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison
NOBL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.07%, less than SCHD's 3.31% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NOBL ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 2.07% | 2.14% | 2.05% | 2.09% | 1.94% | 1.89% | 2.14% | 1.89% | 2.37% | 1.74% | 2.13% | 2.02% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 3.31% | 3.82% | 3.64% | 3.49% | 3.39% | 2.78% | 3.16% | 2.98% | 3.06% | 2.63% | 2.89% | 2.97% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NOBL and SCHD have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCHD has higher volatility (3.58%) compared to NOBL (3.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NOBL dropped -35.43% vs SCHD's -33.37%.
On 10-year performance, SCHD leads with 12.59% vs 9.76% for NOBL. On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, NOBL has been the lower-risk option at 3.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SCHD has performed better with a 12.59% return vs 9.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for NOBL.
SCHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.31%, compared with 2.07% for NOBL.
NOBL tracks S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index, while SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for NOBL and 0.06% for SCHD.
SCHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NOBL and SCHD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer