EET vs. EFO
EET (ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets) and EFO (ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE) are both Leveraged Equities funds from ProShares - EET tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets Index (200%) while EFO tracks the MSCI EAFE Index (200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EET returned 11.03%/yr vs 10.16%/yr for EFO. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.
Performance
EET vs. EFO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EET achieves a 54.14% return, which is significantly higher than EFO's 12.87% return. Over the past 10 years, EET has outperformed EFO with an annualized return of 11.03%, while EFO has yielded a comparatively lower 10.16% annualized return.
EET
- 1D
- -2.52%
- 1M
- 17.51%
- YTD
- 54.14%
- 6M
- 60.18%
- 1Y
- 118.88%
- 3Y*
- 38.53%
- 5Y*
- 4.07%
- 10Y*
- 11.03%
EFO
- 1D
- -1.58%
- 1M
- 6.17%
- YTD
- 12.87%
- 6M
- 17.60%
- 1Y
- 34.57%
- 3Y*
- 23.50%
- 5Y*
- 7.18%
- 10Y*
- 10.16%
EET vs. EFO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EET ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets | 54.14% | 63.14% | 2.88% | 7.06% | -43.07% | -10.93% | 18.92% | 31.87% | -33.84% | 82.41% |
EFO ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE | 12.87% | 58.51% | -2.15% | 25.77% | -33.62% | 19.38% | 2.29% | 40.93% | -30.91% | 51.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between EET and EFO is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2009 | 0.69 |
The correlation between EET and EFO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.
EET vs. EFO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EET
EFO
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
EET
EFO
Basic Materials
EET
-
EFO
-
Communication Services
EET
-
EFO
-
Consumer Cyclical
EET
-
EFO
-
Consumer Defensive
EET
-
EFO
-
Energy
EET
-
EFO
-
Healthcare
EET
-
EFO
-
Industrials
EET
-
EFO
-
Real Estate
EET
-
EFO
-
Technology
EET
-
EFO
-
Utilities
EET
-
EFO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EET vs. EFO — Risk / Return Rank
EET
EFO
EET vs. EFO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets (EET) and ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE (EFO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EET | EFO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.88 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.61 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.21 | +0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.53 | 1.57 | +2.97 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.64 | 5.42 | +11.21 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EET | EFO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.02 | 1.14 | +1.88 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 | 0.22 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.27 | 0.30 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.12 | 0.23 | -0.11 |
Drawdowns
EET vs. EFO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EET drawdown since its inception was -71.66%, which is greater than EFO's maximum drawdown of -63.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EET and EFO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EET | EFO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.66% | -63.52% | -8.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.38% | -22.18% | -4.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.89% | -26.85% | -8.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -64.88% | -53.95% | -10.93% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -69.07% | -63.52% | -5.55% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.52% | -5.54% | +3.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -37.27% | -18.67% | -18.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.17% | 6.39% | +0.78% |
Volatility
EET vs. EFO - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets (EET) has a higher volatility of 17.46% compared to ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE (EFO) at 10.08%. This indicates that EET's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EFO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EET | EFO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.46% | 10.08% | +7.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.52% | 25.18% | +9.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.66% | 30.54% | +9.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.78% | 32.98% | +4.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.60% | 34.09% | +6.51% |
EET vs. EFO - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both EET and EFO have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Dividends
EET vs. EFO - Dividend Comparison
EET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.23%, less than EFO's 1.54% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EET ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets | 1.23% | 1.82% | 3.85% | 2.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% | 1.40% | 0.16% |
EFO ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE | 1.54% | 1.65% | 2.24% | 1.93% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.37% | 0.11% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EET and EFO have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EET has higher volatility (17.46%) compared to EFO (10.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EET dropped -71.66% vs EFO's -63.52%.
On 10-year performance, EET leads with 11.03% vs 10.16% for EFO. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, EFO has been the lower-risk option at 10.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, EET has performed better with a 11.03% return vs 10.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EET and EFO have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.
EFO has the higher dividend yield at 1.54%, compared with 1.23% for EET.
EET tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Index (200%), while EFO tracks MSCI EAFE Index (200%).
EET currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.02 vs 1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EET and EFO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer