EET vs. EFO
Compare and contrast key facts about ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets (EET) and ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE (EFO).
EET and EFO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EET is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Emerging Markets Index (200%). It was launched on Jun 2, 2009. EFO is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI EAFE Index (200%). It was launched on Jun 2, 2009. Both EET and EFO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: EET or EFO.
Correlation
The correlation between EET and EFO is 0.69, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
EET vs. EFO - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
EET:
0.25
EFO:
0.00
EET:
0.56
EFO:
0.18
EET:
1.07
EFO:
1.02
EET:
0.13
EFO:
0.00
EET:
0.92
EFO:
0.01
EET:
8.42%
EFO:
7.16%
EET:
31.68%
EFO:
25.78%
EET:
-71.66%
EFO:
-63.53%
EET:
-54.68%
EFO:
-23.14%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EET achieves a 4.40% return, which is significantly higher than EFO's -2.13% return. Over the past 10 years, EET has underperformed EFO with an annualized return of -2.03%, while EFO has yielded a comparatively higher 2.94% annualized return.
EET
4.40%
-3.49%
-4.90%
11.78%
-7.36%
-2.03%
EFO
-2.13%
-3.62%
-9.38%
2.09%
0.07%
2.94%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EET vs. EFO - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both EET and EFO have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
EET vs. EFO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets (EET) and ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE (EFO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
EET vs. EFO - Dividend Comparison
EET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.38%, more than EFO's 1.54% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EET ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets | 2.38% | 2.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% | 1.40% | 0.16% |
EFO ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE | 1.54% | 1.93% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.37% | 0.11% |
Drawdowns
EET vs. EFO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EET drawdown since its inception was -71.66%, which is greater than EFO's maximum drawdown of -63.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EET and EFO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
EET vs. EFO - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets (EET) has a higher volatility of 7.78% compared to ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE (EFO) at 6.93%. This indicates that EET's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EFO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.