PortfoliosLab logo
EET vs. EFO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between EET and EFO is 0.70, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.7

Performance

EET vs. EFO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets (EET) and ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE (EFO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%50.00%100.00%150.00%200.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-1.15%
175.70%
EET
EFO

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

EET:

0.18

EFO:

0.41

Sortino Ratio

EET:

0.53

EFO:

0.80

Omega Ratio

EET:

1.07

EFO:

1.11

Calmar Ratio

EET:

0.11

EFO:

0.48

Martin Ratio

EET:

0.52

EFO:

1.45

Ulcer Index

EET:

13.30%

EFO:

9.95%

Daily Std Dev

EET:

38.41%

EFO:

34.73%

Max Drawdown

EET:

-71.66%

EFO:

-63.53%

Current Drawdown

EET:

-53.03%

EFO:

-6.49%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EET achieves a 5.18% return, which is significantly lower than EFO's 21.69% return. Over the past 10 years, EET has underperformed EFO with an annualized return of -3.37%, while EFO has yielded a comparatively higher 2.82% annualized return.


EET

YTD

5.18%

1M

-1.52%

6M

-6.32%

1Y

7.85%

5Y*

4.54%

10Y*

-3.37%

EFO

YTD

21.69%

1M

5.69%

6M

10.41%

1Y

16.94%

5Y*

15.94%

10Y*

2.82%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


EET vs. EFO - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both EET and EFO have an expense ratio of 0.95%.


Expense ratio chart for EET: current value is 0.95%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
EET: 0.95%
Expense ratio chart for EFO: current value is 0.95%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
EFO: 0.95%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

EET vs. EFO — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EET
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of EET is 3434
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of EET is 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of EET is 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of EET is 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of EET is 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of EET is 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

EFO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of EFO is 5353
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of EFO is 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of EFO is 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of EFO is 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of EFO is 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of EFO is 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

EET vs. EFO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets (EET) and ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE (EFO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for EET, currently valued at 0.18, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.00
EET: 0.18
EFO: 0.41
The chart of Sortino ratio for EET, currently valued at 0.53, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.00
EET: 0.53
EFO: 0.80
The chart of Omega ratio for EET, currently valued at 1.07, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.00
EET: 1.07
EFO: 1.11
The chart of Calmar ratio for EET, currently valued at 0.11, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.00
EET: 0.11
EFO: 0.48
The chart of Martin ratio for EET, currently valued at 0.52, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.00
EET: 0.52
EFO: 1.45

The current EET Sharpe Ratio is 0.18, which is lower than the EFO Sharpe Ratio of 0.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EET and EFO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.501.001.50NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
0.18
0.41
EET
EFO

Dividends

EET vs. EFO - Dividend Comparison

EET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.65%, more than EFO's 1.80% yield.


TTM2024202320222021202020192018
EET
ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets
3.65%3.85%2.14%0.00%0.00%0.01%1.40%0.16%
EFO
ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE
1.80%2.24%1.93%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.37%0.11%

Drawdowns

EET vs. EFO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EET drawdown since its inception was -71.66%, which is greater than EFO's maximum drawdown of -63.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EET and EFO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-53.03%
-6.49%
EET
EFO

Volatility

EET vs. EFO - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets (EET) and ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE (EFO) have volatilities of 21.90% and 23.02%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
21.90%
23.02%
EET
EFO