PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
GLL vs. NOBL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

GLL vs. NOBL

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

GLL (ProShares UltraShort Gold) and NOBL (ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GLL is a Leveraged Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Gold (-200%), while NOBL is a Dividend fund tracking the S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, GLL returned -23.48%/yr vs 9.58%/yr for NOBL. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions. GLL charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for NOBL.

Performance

GLL vs. NOBL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares UltraShort Gold (GLL) and ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLL achieves a -15.95% return, which is significantly lower than NOBL's 4.61% return. Over the past 10 years, GLL has underperformed NOBL with an annualized return of -23.48%, while NOBL has yielded a comparatively higher 9.58% annualized return.

GLL

1D
-1.70%
1M
3.39%
YTD
-15.95%
6M
-19.96%
1Y
-48.55%
3Y*
-41.54%
5Y*
-29.06%
10Y*
-23.48%

NOBL

1D
1.06%
1M
1.10%
YTD
4.61%
6M
4.84%
1Y
10.44%
3Y*
8.56%
5Y*
5.25%
10Y*
9.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLL vs. NOBL - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GLL
ProShares UltraShort Gold		-15.95%-62.81%-33.33%-14.91%-2.12%1.66%-41.47%-26.95%5.39%-23.67%
NOBL
ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF		4.61%6.84%6.72%8.09%-6.52%25.46%8.35%27.39%-3.26%21.02%

Correlation

The correlation between GLL and NOBL is -0.17, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.13

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2013

-0.02

The correlation between GLL and NOBL shifts across timeframes, from -0.17 (1 year) to -0.02 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

ProShares UltraShort Gold

ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF

Often compared with GLL:
GLL vs. UGLGLL vs. GLDGLL vs. GC=FGLL vs. AGQGLL vs. FNGDGLL vs. DRIPGLL vs. YANG
Often compared with NOBL:
NOBL vs. SCHDNOBL vs. SPYNOBL vs. VIGNOBL vs. DGRONOBL vs. SDYNOBL vs. VOONOBL vs. KNG

Return for Risk

GLL vs. NOBL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
GLL
GLL Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
GLL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLL Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLL Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
GLL Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLL Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank
NOBL
NOBL Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
NOBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NOBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
NOBL Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
NOBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
NOBL Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLL vs. NOBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Gold (GLL) and ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

GLLNOBLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
-0.93
0.92

-1.85

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
-1.51
1.42

-2.93

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.83

1.16

-0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.75

1.15

-1.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.16

2.98

-4.14

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GLL vs. NOBL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLL Sharpe Ratio is -0.93, which is lower than the NOBL Sharpe Ratio of 0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLL and NOBL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

GLLNOBLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.93

0.92

-1.85

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.81

0.37

-1.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.73

0.58

-1.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.68

0.65

-1.32

Drawdowns

GLL vs. NOBL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLL drawdown since its inception was -99.24%, which is greater than NOBL's maximum drawdown of -35.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLL and NOBL.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

GLLNOBLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.24%

-35.43%

-63.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-65.10%

-9.11%

-55.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-87.95%

-15.36%

-72.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-89.76%

-17.92%

-71.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-95.76%

-35.43%

-60.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-98.96%

-4.99%

-93.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-85.13%

-3.48%

-81.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

41.87%

3.51%

+38.36%

Volatility

GLL vs. NOBL - Volatility Comparison

ProShares UltraShort Gold (GLL) has a higher volatility of 11.07% compared to ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) at 2.40%. This indicates that GLL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NOBL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

GLLNOBLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.07%

2.40%

+8.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

44.43%

8.05%

+36.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

52.37%

11.37%

+41.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.89%

14.39%

+21.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.12%

16.60%

+15.52%

GLL vs. NOBL - Expense Ratio Comparison

GLL has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than NOBL's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

GLL vs. NOBL - Dividend Comparison

GLL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NOBL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.10%.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GLL
ProShares UltraShort Gold		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NOBL
ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF		2.10%2.14%2.05%2.09%1.94%1.89%2.14%1.89%2.37%1.74%2.13%2.02%

Frequently Asked Questions

GLL and NOBL have a correlation of -0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GLL has higher volatility (11.07%) compared to NOBL (2.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLL dropped -99.24% vs NOBL's -35.43%.

On 10-year performance, NOBL leads with 9.58% vs -23.48% for GLL. On fees, NOBL is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, NOBL has been the lower-risk option at 2.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, NOBL has performed better with a 9.58% return vs -23.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NOBL is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for GLL.

NOBL has the higher dividend yield at 2.10%, compared with 0.00% for GLL.

GLL is categorized as Leveraged Commodities, while NOBL is Dividend. GLL tracks Bloomberg Gold (-200%), while NOBL tracks S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for GLL and 0.35% for NOBL.

NOBL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.92 vs -0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GLL and NOBL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer