PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GLL vs. DRIP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GLL vs. DRIP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares UltraShort Gold (GLL) and Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bear 2x Shares (DRIP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLL achieves a 3.86% return, which is significantly higher than DRIP's -48.08% return. Over the past 10 years, GLL has outperformed DRIP with an annualized return of -20.73%, while DRIP has yielded a comparatively lower -42.27% annualized return.


GLL

1D
5.23%
1M
9.87%
6M
18.09%
YTD
3.86%
1Y
-37.13%
3Y*
-37.68%
5Y*
-26.90%
10Y*
-20.73%

DRIP

1D
-8.32%
1M
-1.64%
6M
-46.66%
YTD
-48.08%
1Y
-45.69%
3Y*
-27.37%
5Y*
-42.71%
10Y*
-42.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLL vs. DRIP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GLL
ProShares UltraShort Gold
3.86%-62.81%-33.33%-14.91%-2.12%1.66%-41.47%-26.95%5.39%-23.67%
DRIP
Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bear 2x Shares
-48.08%-14.81%1.27%-17.24%-73.57%-79.74%-42.76%-36.11%49.62%-9.05%

Correlation

The correlation between GLL and DRIP is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.10

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2015

0.03

The correlation between GLL and DRIP shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (1 year) to 0.12 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GLL vs. DRIP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLL
GLL Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
GLL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLL Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLL Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
GLL Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLL Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

DRIP
DRIP Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
DRIP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DRIP Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
DRIP Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
DRIP Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
DRIP Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLL vs. DRIP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Gold (GLL) and Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bear 2x Shares (DRIP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GLLDRIPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.90

0.88

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.57

-0.74

+0.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.84

-1.29

+0.45

GLL vs. DRIP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLL Sharpe Ratio is -0.68, which is comparable to the DRIP Sharpe Ratio of -0.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLL and DRIP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GLL vs. DRIP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLL drawdown since its inception was -99.24%, roughly equal to the maximum DRIP drawdown of -99.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLL and DRIP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GLLDRIPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.24%

-99.95%

+0.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-65.10%

-62.18%

-2.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-87.95%

-76.02%

-11.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-89.76%

-96.24%

+6.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-95.76%

-99.92%

+4.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-98.71%

-99.94%

+1.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-85.19%

-90.51%

+5.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

44.14%

35.50%

+8.64%

Volatility

GLL vs. DRIP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares UltraShort Gold (GLL) is 15.04%, while Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bear 2x Shares (DRIP) has a volatility of 17.28%. This indicates that GLL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DRIP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GLLDRIPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.04%

17.28%

-2.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

46.46%

44.06%

+2.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

55.09%

56.84%

-1.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.69%

68.18%

-31.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.42%

95.90%

-63.48%

GLL vs. DRIP - Expense Ratio Comparison

GLL has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than DRIP's 1.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

GLL vs. DRIP - Dividend Comparison

GLL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DRIP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.42%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
DRIP
Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bear 2x Shares
3.42%2.86%4.38%5.09%0.00%0.00%0.01%0.96%0.58%
GLL
ProShares UltraShort Gold
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GLL and DRIP have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DRIP has higher volatility (17.28%) compared to GLL (15.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLL dropped -99.24% vs DRIP's -99.95%.

On 10-year performance, GLL leads with -20.73% vs -42.27% for DRIP. On fees, GLL is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, GLL has been the lower-risk option at 15.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, GLL has performed better with a -20.73% return vs -42.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GLL is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for DRIP.

DRIP has the higher dividend yield at 3.42%, compared with 0.00% for GLL.

GLL is categorized as Leveraged Commodities, while DRIP is Leveraged Equities. GLL tracks Bloomberg Gold (-200%), while DRIP tracks S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Select Industry Index (-300%). They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for GLL and 1.07% for DRIP.

GLL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.68 vs -0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GLL and DRIP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer