GLL vs. AGQ
Compare and contrast key facts about ProShares UltraShort Gold (GLL) and ProShares Ultra Silver (AGQ).
GLL and AGQ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GLL is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Gold (-200%). It was launched on Dec 1, 2008. AGQ is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Silver (-200%). It was launched on Dec 1, 2008. Both GLL and AGQ are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: GLL or AGQ.
Key characteristics
| GLL | AGQ | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | -36.41% | 46.96% |
| 1Y Return | -42.11% | 59.21% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -19.18% | 1.23% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | -21.82% | 7.12% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | -16.75% | 0.27% |
| Sharpe Ratio | -1.47 | 0.95 |
| Sortino Ratio | -2.41 | 1.59 |
| Omega Ratio | 0.75 | 1.19 |
| Calmar Ratio | -0.44 | 0.62 |
| Martin Ratio | -1.53 | 3.61 |
| Ulcer Index | 27.77% | 16.52% |
| Daily Std Dev | 28.87% | 63.01% |
| Max Drawdown | -97.04% | -98.16% |
| Current Drawdown | -96.82% | -94.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between GLL and AGQ is -0.79. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Performance
GLL vs. AGQ - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, GLL achieves a -36.41% return, which is significantly lower than AGQ's 46.96% return. Over the past 10 years, GLL has underperformed AGQ with an annualized return of -16.75%, while AGQ has yielded a comparatively higher 0.27% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GLL vs. AGQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
GLL has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than AGQ's 0.93% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
GLL vs. AGQ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Gold (GLL) and ProShares Ultra Silver (AGQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
GLL vs. AGQ - Dividend Comparison
Neither GLL nor AGQ has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
GLL vs. AGQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLL drawdown since its inception was -97.04%, roughly equal to the maximum AGQ drawdown of -98.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLL and AGQ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
GLL vs. AGQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares UltraShort Gold (GLL) is 9.33%, while ProShares Ultra Silver (AGQ) has a volatility of 21.56%. This indicates that GLL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AGQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.