GLL vs. GC=F
GLL (ProShares UltraShort Gold) is Leveraged Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Gold (-200%), while GC=F (Gold Futures) is an asset. At a correlation of -0.19, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
GLL vs. GC=F - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
GLL
- 1D
- 3.82%
- 1M
- 18.89%
- YTD
- -1.30%
- 6M
- 7.14%
- 1Y
- -39.64%
- 3Y*
- -39.33%
- 5Y*
- -28.52%
- 10Y*
- -21.26%
GC=F
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GLL vs. GC=F - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLL ProShares UltraShort Gold | -1.30% | -62.81% | -33.33% | -14.91% | -6.09% |
GC=F Gold Futures | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 5.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between GLL and GC=F is -0.19, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2022 | -0.19 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GLL vs. GC=F — Risk / Return Rank
GLL
GC=F
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
GLL vs. GC=F - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Gold (GLL) and Gold Futures (GC=F). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GLL | GC=F | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.89 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.61 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.92 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GLL vs. GC=F - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLL | GC=F | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.24% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -65.10% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -87.95% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -89.76% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -95.76% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -98.77% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -85.15% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 43.09% | — | — |
Volatility
GLL vs. GC=F - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GLL | GC=F | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.15% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 46.91% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 54.37% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.40% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.31% | — | — |
Frequently Asked Questions
GLL and GC=F have a correlation of -0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for GLL and GC=F
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer