GLL vs. FNGD
Compare and contrast key facts about ProShares UltraShort Gold (GLL) and MicroSectors FANG+™ Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (FNGD).
GLL and FNGD are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GLL is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Gold (-200%). It was launched on Dec 1, 2008. FNGD is a passively managed fund by BMO Financial Group that tracks the performance of the NYSE FANG+ Index (-300%). It was launched on Jan 22, 2018. Both GLL and FNGD are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: GLL or FNGD.
Performance
GLL vs. FNGD - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLL achieves a -33.86% return, which is significantly higher than FNGD's -71.63% return.
GLL
-33.86%
6.99%
-11.96%
-38.68%
-21.12%
-15.94%
FNGD
-71.63%
-14.70%
-45.79%
-75.28%
-77.69%
N/A
Key characteristics
| GLL | FNGD | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | -1.31 | -1.07 |
| Sortino Ratio | -2.06 | -2.26 |
| Omega Ratio | 0.78 | 0.75 |
| Calmar Ratio | -0.40 | -0.76 |
| Martin Ratio | -1.44 | -1.37 |
| Ulcer Index | 26.69% | 55.79% |
| Daily Std Dev | 29.44% | 71.40% |
| Max Drawdown | -97.04% | -99.98% |
| Current Drawdown | -96.69% | -99.98% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GLL vs. FNGD - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both GLL and FNGD have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Correlation
The correlation between GLL and FNGD is 0.07, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
GLL vs. FNGD - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Gold (GLL) and MicroSectors FANG+™ Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (FNGD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
GLL vs. FNGD - Dividend Comparison
Neither GLL nor FNGD has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
GLL vs. FNGD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLL drawdown since its inception was -97.04%, roughly equal to the maximum FNGD drawdown of -99.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLL and FNGD. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
GLL vs. FNGD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares UltraShort Gold (GLL) is 10.99%, while MicroSectors FANG+™ Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (FNGD) has a volatility of 20.08%. This indicates that GLL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNGD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.