GLL vs. GLD
GLL (ProShares UltraShort Gold) and GLD (SPDR Gold Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - GLL is a Leveraged Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Gold (-200%), while GLD is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price PM. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, GLL returned -23.37%/yr vs 13.12%/yr for GLD. At a correlation of -0.99, they often move in opposite directions. GLL charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for GLD.
Performance
GLL vs. GLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLL achieves a -14.49% return, which is significantly lower than GLD's 2.92% return. Over the past 10 years, GLL has underperformed GLD with an annualized return of -23.37%, while GLD has yielded a comparatively higher 13.12% annualized return.
GLL
- 1D
- 2.05%
- 1M
- 3.37%
- YTD
- -14.49%
- 6M
- -18.72%
- 1Y
- -48.24%
- 3Y*
- -41.46%
- 5Y*
- -28.82%
- 10Y*
- -23.37%
GLD
- 1D
- -0.99%
- 1M
- -1.65%
- YTD
- 2.92%
- 6M
- 5.43%
- 1Y
- 32.04%
- 3Y*
- 31.09%
- 5Y*
- 18.15%
- 10Y*
- 13.12%
GLL vs. GLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLL ProShares UltraShort Gold | -14.49% | -62.81% | -33.33% | -14.91% | -2.12% | 1.66% | -41.47% | -26.95% | 5.39% | -23.67% |
GLD SPDR Gold Shares | 2.92% | 63.68% | 26.66% | 12.69% | -0.77% | -4.15% | 24.81% | 17.86% | -1.94% | 12.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between GLL and GLD is -1.00, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.00 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -1.00 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -1.00 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.99 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2008 | -0.99 |
The correlation between GLL and GLD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -1.00 to -0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GLL vs. GLD — Risk / Return Rank
GLL
GLD
GLL vs. GLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Gold (GLL) and SPDR Gold Shares (GLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GLL | GLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.92 | 1.21 | -2.13 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.50 | 1.60 | -3.10 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.83 | 1.24 | -0.41 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.74 | 1.68 | -2.42 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.16 | 4.15 | -5.31 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GLL | GLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.92 | 1.21 | -2.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.81 | 1.01 | -1.82 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.73 | 0.83 | -1.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.67 | 0.60 | -1.27 |
Drawdowns
GLL vs. GLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLL drawdown since its inception was -99.24%, which is greater than GLD's maximum drawdown of -45.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLL and GLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLL | GLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.24% | -45.56% | -53.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -65.10% | -19.21% | -45.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -87.95% | -19.21% | -68.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -89.76% | -21.03% | -68.73% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -95.76% | -22.00% | -73.76% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -98.94% | -17.75% | -81.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -85.13% | -16.16% | -68.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 41.74% | 7.73% | +34.01% |
Volatility
GLL vs. GLD - Volatility Comparison
ProShares UltraShort Gold (GLL) has a higher volatility of 11.07% compared to SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) at 5.51%. This indicates that GLL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GLL | GLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.07% | 5.51% | +5.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 44.43% | 23.16% | +21.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 52.38% | 26.61% | +25.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.90% | 18.00% | +17.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.12% | 15.95% | +16.17% |
GLL vs. GLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
GLL has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than GLD's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
GLL vs. GLD - Dividend Comparison
Neither GLL nor GLD has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
GLL and GLD have a correlation of -1.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GLL has higher volatility (11.07%) compared to GLD (5.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLL dropped -99.24% vs GLD's -45.56%.
On 10-year performance, GLD leads with 13.12% vs -23.37% for GLL. On fees, GLD is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, GLD has been the lower-risk option at 5.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, GLD has performed better with a 13.12% return vs -23.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GLD is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for GLL.
GLL and GLD have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
GLL is categorized as Leveraged Commodities, while GLD is Gold. GLL tracks Bloomberg Gold (-200%), while GLD tracks LBMA Gold Price PM. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for GLL and 0.40% for GLD.
GLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.21 vs -0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GLL and GLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer