SVM vs. ET
SVM (Silvercorp Metals Inc.) and ET (Energy Transfer LP) are both stocks. SVM operates in Silver (Basic Materials), while ET operates in Oil & Gas Midstream (Energy). Over the past 10 years, SVM returned 19.41%/yr vs 13.14%/yr for ET. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SVM vs. ET - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SVM achieves a 35.63% return, which is significantly higher than ET's 19.85% return. Over the past 10 years, SVM has outperformed ET with an annualized return of 19.41%, while ET has yielded a comparatively lower 13.14% annualized return.
SVM
- 1D
- 7.52%
- 1M
- -28.00%
- YTD
- 35.63%
- 6M
- 39.13%
- 1Y
- 166.61%
- 3Y*
- 57.23%
- 5Y*
- 13.01%
- 10Y*
- 19.41%
ET
- 1D
- 1.65%
- 1M
- -5.12%
- YTD
- 19.85%
- 6M
- 19.34%
- 1Y
- 11.35%
- 3Y*
- 24.04%
- 5Y*
- 20.15%
- 10Y*
- 13.14%
SVM vs. ET - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SVM Silvercorp Metals Inc. | 35.63% | 179.29% | 14.88% | -10.33% | -20.60% | -43.52% | 18.54% | 172.27% | -18.96% | 12.52% |
ET Energy Transfer LP | 19.85% | -9.37% | 53.87% | 27.87% | 55.74% | 42.96% | -44.92% | 5.88% | -17.74% | -4.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between SVM and ET is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2006 | 0.18 |
The correlation between SVM and ET shifts across timeframes, from 0.01 (1 year) to 0.23 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
SVM:
$2.50B
ET:
$65.93B
SVM:
-$0.05
ET:
$1.36
SVM:
5.67
ET:
0.76
SVM:
2.65
ET:
1.33
SVM:
$437.11M
ET:
$89.38B
SVM:
$254.02M
ET:
$20.48B
SVM:
$185.32M
ET:
$13.02B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SVM vs. ET — Risk / Return Rank
SVM
ET
SVM vs. ET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Silvercorp Metals Inc. (SVM) and Energy Transfer LP (ET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SVM | ET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.71 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.43 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.13 | +0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.30 | 1.22 | +3.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.58 | 2.70 | +9.88 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SVM vs. ET - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SVM drawdown since its inception was -98.00%, which is greater than ET's maximum drawdown of -87.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SVM and ET.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SVM | ET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.00% | -87.81% | -10.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -39.02% | -9.38% | -29.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -42.86% | -24.56% | -18.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -67.44% | -25.82% | -41.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -76.19% | -72.82% | -3.37% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -42.85% | -6.47% | -36.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -71.64% | -25.72% | -45.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.30% | 4.65% | +8.65% |
Volatility
SVM vs. ET - Volatility Comparison
Silvercorp Metals Inc. (SVM) has a higher volatility of 26.97% compared to Energy Transfer LP (ET) at 5.08%. This indicates that SVM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SVM | ET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 26.97% | 5.08% | +21.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 56.61% | 12.03% | +44.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 69.31% | 16.13% | +53.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 55.63% | 24.86% | +30.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 61.77% | 34.99% | +26.78% |
Dividends
SVM vs. ET - Dividend Comparison
SVM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.22%, less than ET's 7.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ET Energy Transfer LP | 7.00% | 7.97% | 6.51% | 8.95% | 7.33% | 7.41% | 17.27% | 9.51% | 9.24% | 6.66% | 5.90% | 7.42% |
SVM Silvercorp Metals Inc. | 0.22% | 0.30% | 0.83% | 0.95% | 0.84% | 0.66% | 0.37% | 0.44% | 1.19% | 0.76% | 0.43% | 2.13% |
Financials
SVM vs. ET - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Silvercorp Metals Inc. and Energy Transfer LP. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
SVM vs. ET - Profitability Comparison
SVM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Silvercorp Metals Inc. reported a gross profit of 99.96M and revenue of 145.32M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 68.8%.
ET - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Energy Transfer LP reported a gross profit of 6.62B and revenue of 27.77B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 23.9%.
SVM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Silvercorp Metals Inc. reported an operating income of 93.44M and revenue of 145.32M, resulting in an operating margin of 64.3%.
ET - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Energy Transfer LP reported an operating income of 2.98B and revenue of 27.77B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.7%.
SVM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Silvercorp Metals Inc. reported a net income of -606.31K and revenue of 145.32M, resulting in a net margin of -0.4%.
ET - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Energy Transfer LP reported a net income of 1.25B and revenue of 27.77B, resulting in a net margin of 4.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
SVM and ET have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SVM has higher volatility (26.97%) compared to ET (5.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SVM dropped -98.00% vs ET's -87.81%.
SVM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SVM and ET
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer