PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Risk Analysis
Optimization
Factor Model
See All Tools
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
ET vs. KMI
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


ETKMI
YTD Return16.55%6.99%
1Y Return33.89%14.12%
3Y Return (Ann)32.63%9.03%
5Y Return (Ann)10.96%5.34%
10Y Return (Ann)3.82%-0.69%
Sharpe Ratio2.310.82
Daily Std Dev14.81%16.90%
Max Drawdown-87.81%-72.70%
Current Drawdown-6.24%-33.79%

Fundamentals


ETKMI
Market Cap$53.75B$41.46B
EPS$1.09$1.09
PE Ratio14.6417.14
PEG Ratio0.581.71
Revenue (TTM)$78.59B$15.29B
Gross Profit (TTM)$13.42B$7.29B
EBITDA (TTM)$12.69B$6.46B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.5

The correlation between ET and KMI is 0.53, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

ET vs. KMI - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, ET achieves a 16.55% return, which is significantly higher than KMI's 6.99% return. Over the past 10 years, ET has outperformed KMI with an annualized return of 3.82%, while KMI has yielded a comparatively lower -0.69% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


0.00%100.00%200.00%300.00%NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
310.36%
11.95%
ET
KMI

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Energy Transfer LP

Kinder Morgan, Inc.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

ET vs. KMI - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Energy Transfer LP (ET) and Kinder Morgan, Inc. (KMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ET
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for ET, currently valued at 2.31, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.002.31
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for ET, currently valued at 3.30, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.003.30
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for ET, currently valued at 1.40, compared to the broader market0.501.001.501.40
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for ET, currently valued at 1.08, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.08
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for ET, currently valued at 19.16, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.0019.16
KMI
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for KMI, currently valued at 0.82, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.000.82
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for KMI, currently valued at 1.30, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.001.30
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for KMI, currently valued at 1.15, compared to the broader market0.501.001.501.15
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for KMI, currently valued at 0.30, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.30
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for KMI, currently valued at 3.69, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.003.69

ET vs. KMI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ET Sharpe Ratio is 2.31, which is higher than the KMI Sharpe Ratio of 0.82. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of ET and KMI.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.00NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
2.31
0.82
ET
KMI

Dividends

ET vs. KMI - Dividend Comparison

ET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.91%, more than KMI's 6.21% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
ET
Energy Transfer LP
7.91%8.95%7.33%7.41%17.27%9.51%9.24%6.66%5.90%7.42%2.61%3.19%
KMI
Kinder Morgan, Inc.
6.21%6.38%6.10%6.76%7.59%4.49%4.71%2.77%2.41%12.94%4.02%4.33%

Drawdowns

ET vs. KMI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ET drawdown since its inception was -87.81%, which is greater than KMI's maximum drawdown of -72.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ET and KMI. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
-6.24%
-33.79%
ET
KMI

Volatility

ET vs. KMI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Energy Transfer LP (ET) is 4.55%, while Kinder Morgan, Inc. (KMI) has a volatility of 5.68%. This indicates that ET experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KMI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
4.55%
5.68%
ET
KMI

Financials

ET vs. KMI - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Energy Transfer LP and Kinder Morgan, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items