PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SVM vs. ^TNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

SVM vs. ^TNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Silvercorp Metals Inc. (SVM) and Treasury Yield 10 Years (^TNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

SVM vs. ^TNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SVM
Silvercorp Metals Inc.
33.09%179.29%14.88%-10.33%-20.60%-43.52%18.54%172.27%-18.96%12.52%
^TNX
Treasury Yield 10 Years
3.75%-8.97%18.29%-0.34%156.55%64.89%-52.21%-28.56%11.68%-1.68%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SVM achieves a 33.09% return, which is significantly higher than ^TNX's 3.75% return. Over the past 10 years, SVM has outperformed ^TNX with an annualized return of 23.69%, while ^TNX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.20% annualized return.


SVM

1D
3.35%
1M
-18.14%
YTD
33.09%
6M
70.54%
1Y
190.40%
3Y*
43.70%
5Y*
17.45%
10Y*
23.69%

^TNX

1D
0.19%
1M
6.69%
YTD
3.75%
6M
5.19%
1Y
3.92%
3Y*
7.32%
5Y*
20.80%
10Y*
9.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SVM vs. ^TNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SVM
SVM Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
SVM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SVM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
SVM Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
SVM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
SVM Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

^TNX
^TNX Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
^TNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^TNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
^TNX Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
^TNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
^TNX Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SVM vs. ^TNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Silvercorp Metals Inc. (SVM) and Treasury Yield 10 Years (^TNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SVM^TNXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.85

0.22

+2.63

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.89

0.45

+2.44

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.05

+0.33

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.46

0.12

+5.34

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

17.53

0.21

+17.32

SVM vs. ^TNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SVM Sharpe Ratio is 2.85, which is higher than the ^TNX Sharpe Ratio of 0.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SVM and ^TNX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SVM^TNXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.85

0.22

+2.63

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

0.63

-0.31

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

0.19

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.18

-0.02

+0.20

Correlation

The correlation between SVM and ^TNX is -0.03. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Drawdowns

SVM vs. ^TNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SVM drawdown since its inception was -98.00%, roughly equal to the maximum ^TNX drawdown of -93.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SVM and ^TNX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


SVM^TNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.00%

-93.78%

-4.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-34.46%

-13.99%

-20.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-68.53%

-31.74%

-36.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-76.19%

-84.57%

+8.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-43.92%

-46.17%

+2.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-71.98%

-51.38%

-20.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.73%

8.39%

+2.34%

Volatility

SVM vs. ^TNX - Volatility Comparison

Silvercorp Metals Inc. (SVM) has a higher volatility of 22.33% compared to Treasury Yield 10 Years (^TNX) at 5.89%. This indicates that SVM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^TNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


SVM^TNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

22.33%

5.89%

+16.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

53.41%

10.58%

+42.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

67.18%

17.89%

+49.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

54.65%

32.96%

+21.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

62.36%

48.18%

+14.18%