ET vs. PAA

In the year-to-date period, ET achieves a -9.48% return, which is significantly lower than PAA's 9.00% return. Over the past 10 years, ET has outperformed PAA with an annualized return of 1.76%, while PAA has yielded a comparatively lower -2.32% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Energy Transfer LP (ET) and Plains All American Pipeline, L.P. (PAA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current ET Sharpe Ratio is 0.70, which is higher than the PAA Sharpe Ratio of 0.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ET and PAA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

ET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.37%, more than PAA's 7.29% yield.

The maximum ET drawdown since its inception was -87.81%, roughly equal to the maximum PAA drawdown of -91.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ET and PAA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Energy Transfer LP (ET) and Plains All American Pipeline, L.P. (PAA) have volatilities of 16.28% and 16.45%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Energy Transfer LP and Plains All American Pipeline, L.P.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.