SVM vs. SLV
SVM (Silvercorp Metals Inc.) is a stock, while SLV (iShares Silver Trust) is Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price. Over the past 10 years, SVM returned 21.49%/yr vs 15.55%/yr for SLV. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
SVM vs. SLV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SVM achieves a 47.00% return, which is significantly higher than SLV's 2.78% return. Over the past 10 years, SVM has outperformed SLV with an annualized return of 21.49%, while SLV has yielded a comparatively lower 15.55% annualized return.
SVM
- 1D
- -7.19%
- 1M
- 0.74%
- YTD
- 47.00%
- 6M
- 54.41%
- 1Y
- 197.51%
- 3Y*
- 58.91%
- 5Y*
- 15.10%
- 10Y*
- 21.49%
SLV
- 1D
- -2.62%
- 1M
- 0.41%
- YTD
- 2.78%
- 6M
- 24.76%
- 1Y
- 110.59%
- 3Y*
- 45.06%
- 5Y*
- 20.76%
- 10Y*
- 15.55%
SVM vs. SLV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SVM Silvercorp Metals Inc. | 47.00% | 179.29% | 14.88% | -10.33% | -20.60% | -43.52% | 18.54% | 172.27% | -18.96% | 12.52% |
SLV iShares Silver Trust | 2.78% | 144.66% | 20.89% | -1.09% | 2.37% | -12.45% | 47.30% | 14.88% | -9.19% | 5.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between SVM and SLV is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2006 | 0.61 |
The correlation between SVM and SLV shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (all time) to 0.73 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SVM vs. SLV — Risk / Return Rank
SVM
SLV
SVM vs. SLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Silvercorp Metals Inc. (SVM) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SVM | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.87 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.35 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.77 | 2.62 | +3.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.28 | 5.64 | +10.63 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SVM | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.98 | 1.89 | +1.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 | 0.58 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.35 | 0.49 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.19 | 0.25 | -0.06 |
Drawdowns
SVM vs. SLV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SVM drawdown since its inception was -98.00%, which is greater than SLV's maximum drawdown of -76.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SVM and SLV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SVM | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.00% | -76.28% | -21.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -34.46% | -42.45% | +7.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -42.86% | -42.45% | -0.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -68.10% | -42.45% | -25.65% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -76.19% | -42.81% | -33.38% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -38.06% | -37.30% | -0.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -71.69% | -44.67% | -27.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.19% | 19.67% | -7.48% |
Volatility
SVM vs. SLV - Volatility Comparison
Silvercorp Metals Inc. (SVM) has a higher volatility of 22.84% compared to iShares Silver Trust (SLV) at 16.30%. This indicates that SVM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SVM | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 22.84% | 16.30% | +6.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 52.94% | 58.31% | -5.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 66.72% | 58.90% | +7.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 54.97% | 36.15% | +18.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 61.53% | 31.84% | +29.69% |
Dividends
SVM vs. SLV - Dividend Comparison
SVM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.20%, while SLV has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLV iShares Silver Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SVM Silvercorp Metals Inc. | 0.20% | 0.30% | 0.83% | 0.95% | 0.84% | 0.66% | 0.37% | 0.44% | 1.19% | 0.76% | 0.43% | 2.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SVM and SLV have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SVM has higher volatility (22.84%) compared to SLV (16.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SVM dropped -98.00% vs SLV's -76.28%.
SVM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.98 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SVM and SLV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer