PortfoliosLab logo
ET vs. WES
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between ET and WES is 0.34, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

ET vs. WES - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Energy Transfer LP (ET) and Western Midstream Partners, LP (WES). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

ET:

0.61

WES:

0.43

Sortino Ratio

ET:

1.02

WES:

0.86

Omega Ratio

ET:

1.14

WES:

1.10

Calmar Ratio

ET:

0.70

WES:

0.85

Martin Ratio

ET:

2.29

WES:

2.21

Ulcer Index

ET:

7.51%

WES:

6.36%

Daily Std Dev

ET:

27.33%

WES:

27.24%

Max Drawdown

ET:

-87.81%

WES:

-93.66%

Current Drawdown

ET:

-15.44%

WES:

-9.39%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ET:

$57.20B

WES:

$13.85B

EPS

ET:

$1.28

WES:

$4.02

PE Ratio

ET:

13.02

WES:

8.92

PEG Ratio

ET:

0.74

WES:

5.48

PS Ratio

ET:

0.67

WES:

3.84

PB Ratio

ET:

1.63

WES:

4.23

Total Revenue (TTM)

ET:

$61.04B

WES:

$2.72B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ET:

$10.60B

WES:

$1.78B

EBITDA (TTM)

ET:

$11.63B

WES:

$1.72B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ET achieves a -9.01% return, which is significantly lower than WES's 1.13% return. Over the past 10 years, ET has underperformed WES with an annualized return of 1.48%, while WES has yielded a comparatively higher 2.46% annualized return.


ET

YTD

-9.01%

1M

5.22%

6M

3.04%

1Y

16.43%

5Y*

28.32%

10Y*

1.48%

WES

YTD

1.13%

1M

4.19%

6M

7.72%

1Y

11.54%

5Y*

51.72%

10Y*

2.46%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

ET vs. WES — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ET
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ET is 7272
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ET is 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ET is 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ET is 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ET is 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ET is 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

WES
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of WES is 6969
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of WES is 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of WES is 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of WES is 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of WES is 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of WES is 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

ET vs. WES - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Energy Transfer LP (ET) and Western Midstream Partners, LP (WES). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current ET Sharpe Ratio is 0.61, which is higher than the WES Sharpe Ratio of 0.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ET and WES, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

ET vs. WES - Dividend Comparison

ET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.38%, less than WES's 9.53% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
ET
Energy Transfer LP
7.53%6.51%8.96%7.33%7.44%17.28%9.51%9.24%6.66%5.90%7.42%2.61%
WES
Western Midstream Partners, LP
9.53%8.33%8.52%6.80%5.69%11.25%12.45%8.28%5.44%4.04%3.86%1.73%

Drawdowns

ET vs. WES - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ET drawdown since its inception was -87.81%, smaller than the maximum WES drawdown of -93.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ET and WES. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

ET vs. WES - Volatility Comparison


Loading data...

Financials

ET vs. WES - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Energy Transfer LP and Western Midstream Partners, LP. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B25.00BAprilJulyOctober2021AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober
19.54B
928.50M
(ET) Total Revenue
(WES) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

ET vs. WES - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Energy Transfer LP and Western Midstream Partners, LP over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%AprilJulyOctober2021AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober
21.0%
75.1%
(ET) Gross Margin
(WES) Gross Margin
ET - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Energy Transfer LP reported a gross profit of 4.10B and revenue of 19.54B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 21.0%.

WES - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Western Midstream Partners, LP reported a gross profit of 697.26M and revenue of 928.50M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 75.1%.

ET - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Energy Transfer LP reported an operating income of 2.28B and revenue of 19.54B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.7%.

WES - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Western Midstream Partners, LP reported an operating income of 425.74M and revenue of 928.50M, resulting in an operating margin of 45.9%.

ET - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Energy Transfer LP reported a net income of 1.08B and revenue of 19.54B, resulting in a net margin of 5.5%.

WES - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Western Midstream Partners, LP reported a net income of 333.61M and revenue of 928.50M, resulting in a net margin of 35.9%.