ET vs. ENB

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Energy Transfer LP (ET) and Enbridge Inc. (ENB).

Performance

ET vs. ENB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Energy Transfer LP (ET) and Enbridge Inc. (ENB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

ET vs. ENB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ET Energy Transfer LP	19.24%	-9.37%	53.87%	27.87%	55.74%	42.96%	-44.92%	5.88%	-17.74%	-4.66%
ENB Enbridge Inc.	14.71%	19.51%	26.35%	-1.13%	6.46%	30.83%	-13.60%	36.05%	-15.53%	-2.73%

Fundamentals

EPS ET : $1.37 ENB : $8.09
PE Ratio ET : 14.10 ENB : 6.69
PS Ratio ET : 0.84 ENB : 1.21
Total Revenue (TTM) ET : $82.63B ENB : $65.19B
Gross Profit (TTM) ET : $18.01B ENB : $0.00
EBITDA (TTM) ET : $14.93B ENB : $10.66B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ET achieves a 19.24% return, which is significantly higher than ENB's 14.71% return. Over the past 10 years, ET has outperformed ENB with an annualized return of 20.51%, while ENB has yielded a comparatively lower 10.17% annualized return.

ET

• 1D: -1.48%
• 1M: 2.44%
• YTD: 19.24%
• 6M: 16.88%
• 1Y: 12.07%
• 3Y*: 25.52%
• 5Y*: 29.51%
• 10Y*: 20.51%

ENB

• 1D: -0.35%
• 1M: 1.88%
• YTD: 14.71%
• 6M: 10.26%
• 1Y: 29.33%
• 3Y*: 19.97%
• 5Y*: 15.26%
• 10Y*: 10.17%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

ET vs. ENB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ET

ET Risk / Return Rank: 57
ET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
ET Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
ET Omega Ratio Rank: 54
ET Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
ET Martin Ratio Rank: 61

ENB

ENB Risk / Return Rank: 86
ENB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
ENB Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
ENB Omega Ratio Rank: 83
ENB Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
ENB Martin Ratio Rank: 85

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ET vs. ENB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Energy Transfer LP (ET) and Enbridge Inc. (ENB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ET	ENB	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.51	1.73	-1.22
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.86	2.30	-1.44
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.12	1.31	-0.19
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.65	3.08	-2.43
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.82	7.65	-5.83
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ET vs. ENB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ET Sharpe Ratio is 0.51, which is lower than the ENB Sharpe Ratio of 1.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ET and ENB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ET	ENB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.51	1.73	-1.22
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.17	0.83	+0.34
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.56	0.42	+0.14
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.36	0.52	-0.17

Correlation

The correlation between ET and ENB is 0.42, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

ET vs. ENB - Dividend Comparison

ET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.87%, more than ENB's 5.07% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ET Energy Transfer LP	6.87%	7.97%	6.51%	8.95%	7.33%	7.41%	17.27%	9.51%	9.24%	6.66%	5.90%	7.42%
ENB Enbridge Inc.	5.07%	5.66%	6.28%	7.31%	6.80%	6.85%	7.55%	5.58%	6.68%	4.71%	4.13%	4.71%

Drawdowns

ET vs. ENB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ET drawdown since its inception was -87.81%, which is greater than ENB's maximum drawdown of -46.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ET and ENB.

Drawdown Indicators

	ET	ENB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-87.81%	-46.35%	-41.46%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.33%	-9.37%	-7.96%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.82%	-28.32%	+2.50%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-72.82%	-44.07%	-28.75%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.88%	-0.81%	-1.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-25.95%	-10.88%	-15.07%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.24%	3.78%	+2.46%

Volatility

ET vs. ENB - Volatility Comparison

Energy Transfer LP (ET) has a higher volatility of 4.96% compared to Enbridge Inc. (ENB) at 3.51%. This indicates that ET's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ENB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ET	ENB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.96%	3.51%	+1.45%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.68%	11.69%	-0.01%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.80%	17.09%	+6.71%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.48%	18.49%	+6.99%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	36.63%	24.41%	+12.22%

Financials