SVM vs. PBA

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Silvercorp Metals Inc. (SVM) and Pembina Pipeline Corporation (PBA).

Performance

SVM vs. PBA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Silvercorp Metals Inc. (SVM) and Pembina Pipeline Corporation (PBA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

SVM vs. PBA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SVM Silvercorp Metals Inc.	28.78%	179.29%	14.88%	-10.33%	-20.60%	-43.52%	18.54%	172.27%	-18.96%	12.52%
PBA Pembina Pipeline Corporation	18.98%	8.55%	13.16%	7.81%	18.33%	36.99%	-30.57%	31.15%	-13.66%	21.15%

Fundamentals

Market Cap SVM : $2.37B PBA : $26.05B
EPS SVM : -$0.08 PBA : $2.91
PS Ratio SVM : 6.41 PBA : 3.34
PB Ratio SVM : 3.34 PBA : 1.55
Total Revenue (TTM) SVM : $366.90M PBA : $7.81B
Gross Profit (TTM) SVM : $180.20M PBA : $3.09B
EBITDA (TTM) SVM : $97.49M PBA : $3.63B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SVM achieves a 28.78% return, which is significantly higher than PBA's 18.98% return. Over the past 10 years, SVM has outperformed PBA with an annualized return of 23.28%, while PBA has yielded a comparatively lower 11.56% annualized return.

SVM

• 1D: 7.08%
• 1M: -22.90%
• YTD: 28.78%
• 6M: 70.23%
• 1Y: 178.81%
• 3Y*: 42.13%
• 5Y*: 16.68%
• 10Y*: 23.28%

PBA

• 1D: -0.91%
• 1M: 2.94%
• YTD: 18.98%
• 6M: 13.42%
• 1Y: 17.75%
• 3Y*: 17.61%
• 5Y*: 15.23%
• 10Y*: 11.56%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

SVM vs. PBA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SVM

SVM Risk / Return Rank: 93
SVM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
SVM Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
SVM Omega Ratio Rank: 88
SVM Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
SVM Martin Ratio Rank: 95

PBA

PBA Risk / Return Rank: 66
PBA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
PBA Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
PBA Omega Ratio Rank: 64
PBA Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
PBA Martin Ratio Rank: 65

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SVM vs. PBA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Silvercorp Metals Inc. (SVM) and Pembina Pipeline Corporation (PBA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SVM	PBA	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.68	0.83	+1.85
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.80	1.16	+1.64
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.17	+0.19
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.17	1.29	+3.88
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	16.71	2.51	+14.20
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SVM vs. PBA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SVM Sharpe Ratio is 2.68, which is higher than the PBA Sharpe Ratio of 0.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SVM and PBA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SVM	PBA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.68	0.83	+1.85
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.31	0.71	-0.41
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.37	0.35	+0.02
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.18	0.36	-0.18

Correlation

The correlation between SVM and PBA is 0.23, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

SVM vs. PBA - Dividend Comparison

SVM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.23%, less than PBA's 4.62% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SVM Silvercorp Metals Inc.	0.23%	0.30%	0.83%	0.95%	0.84%	0.66%	0.37%	0.44%	1.19%	0.76%	0.43%	2.13%
PBA Pembina Pipeline Corporation	4.62%	5.34%	5.39%	5.70%	5.78%	6.71%	8.56%	4.80%	5.81%	4.36%	4.19%	6.48%

Drawdowns

SVM vs. PBA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SVM drawdown since its inception was -98.00%, which is greater than PBA's maximum drawdown of -70.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SVM and PBA.

Drawdown Indicators

	SVM	PBA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-98.00%	-70.87%	-27.13%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-34.46%	-13.99%	-20.47%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-68.53%	-27.37%	-41.16%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-76.19%	-70.87%	-5.32%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-45.74%	-2.21%	-43.53%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-71.98%	-15.19%	-56.79%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.66%	7.19%	+3.47%

Volatility

SVM vs. PBA - Volatility Comparison

Silvercorp Metals Inc. (SVM) has a higher volatility of 23.67% compared to Pembina Pipeline Corporation (PBA) at 3.76%. This indicates that SVM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PBA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SVM	PBA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	23.67%	3.76%	+19.91%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	53.33%	14.19%	+39.14%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	67.12%	21.39%	+45.73%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	54.67%	21.48%	+33.19%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	62.37%	32.94%	+29.43%

Financials

SVM vs. PBA - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Silvercorp Metals Inc. and Pembina Pipeline Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

SVM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Silvercorp Metals Inc. reported a gross profit of 78.04M and revenue of 128.05M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 60.9%.

PBA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Pembina Pipeline Corporation reported a gross profit of 656.00M and revenue of 1.91B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 34.3%.

SVM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Silvercorp Metals Inc. reported an operating income of 71.55M and revenue of 128.05M, resulting in an operating margin of 55.9%.

PBA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Pembina Pipeline Corporation reported an operating income of 785.00M and revenue of 1.91B, resulting in an operating margin of 41.0%.

SVM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Silvercorp Metals Inc. reported a net income of -16.08M and revenue of 128.05M, resulting in a net margin of -12.6%.

PBA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Pembina Pipeline Corporation reported a net income of 489.00M and revenue of 1.91B, resulting in a net margin of 25.6%.